arXiv++ Combinatorics

The architecture of a neural network constrains the potential dynamics that can emerge. Some architectures may only allow for a single dynamic regime, while others display a great deal of flexibility with qualitatively different dynamics that can be reached by modulating connection strengths. In this work, we develop novel mathematical techniques to study the dynamic constraints imposed by different network architectures in the context of competitive threshold-linear networks (TLNs). Any given TLN is naturally characterized by a hyperplane arrangement in $\mathbb{R}^n$, and the combinatorial properties of this arrangement determine the pattern of fixed points of the dynamics. This observation enables us to recast the question of network flexibility in the language of oriented matroids, allowing us to employ tools and results from this theory in order to characterize the different dynamic regimes a given architecture can support. In particular, fixed points of a TLN correspond to cocircuits of an associated oriented matroid; and mutations of the matroid correspond to bifurcations in the collection of fixed points. As an application, we provide a complete characterization of all possible sets of fixed points that can arise in networks through size $n=3$, together with descriptions of how to modulate synaptic strengths of the network in order to access the different dynamic regimes. These results provide a framework for studying the possible computational roles of various motifs observed in real neural networks.

A convex code is a binary code generated by the pattern of intersections of a collection of open convex sets in some Euclidean space. Convex codes are relevant to neuroscience as they arise from the activity of neurons that have convex receptive fields. In this paper, we use algebraic methods to determine if a code is convex. Specifically, we use the neural ideal of a code, which is a generalization of the Stanley-Reisner ideal. Using the neural ideal together with its standard generating set, the canonical form, we provide algebraic signatures of certain families of codes that are non-convex. We connect these signatures to the precise conditions on the arrangement of sets that prevent the codes from being convex. Finally, we also provide algebraic signatures for some families of codes that are convex, including the class of intersection-complete codes. These results allow us to detect convexity and non-convexity in a variety of situations, and point to some interesting open questions.

Neural network models in neuroscience allow one to study how the connections between neurons shape the activity of neural circuits in the brain. In this chapter, we study Combinatorial Threshold-Linear Networks (CTLNs) in order to understand how the pattern of connectivity, as encoded by a directed graph, shapes the emergent nonlinear dynamics of the corresponding network. Important aspects of these dynamics are controlled by the stable and unstable fixed points of the network, and we show how these fixed points can be determined via graph-based rules. We also present an algorithm for predicting sequences of neural activation from the underlying directed graph, and examine the effect of graph symmetries on a network's set of attractors.

Threshold-linear networks (TLNs) are models of neural networks that consist of simple, perceptron-like neurons and exhibit nonlinear dynamics that are determined by the network's connectivity. The fixed points of a TLN, including both stable and unstable equilibria, play a critical role in shaping its emergent dynamics. In this work, we provide two novel characterizations for the set of fixed points of a competitive TLN: the first is in terms of a simple sign condition, while the second relies on the concept of domination. We apply these results to a special family of TLNs, called combinatorial threshold-linear networks (CTLNs), whose connectivity matrices are defined from directed graphs. This leads us to prove a series of graph rules that enable one to determine fixed points of a CTLN by analyzing the underlying graph. Additionally, we study larger networks composed of smaller "building block" subnetworks, and prove several theorems relating the fixed points of the full network to those of its components. Our results provide the foundation for a kind of "graphical calculus" to infer features of the dynamics from a network's connectivity.

Convex codes were recently introduced as models for neural codes in the brain. Any convex code $\C$ has an associated minimal embedding dimension $d(\C)$, which is the minimal Euclidean space dimension such that the code can be realized by a collection of convex open sets. In this work we import tools from combinatorial commutative algebra in order to obtain better bounds on $d(\C)$ from an associated simplicial complex $Δ(\C)$. In particular, we make a connection to minimal free resolutions of Stanley-Reisner ideals, and observe that they contain topological information that provides stronger bounds on $d(\C)$. This motivates us to define the Leray dimension $d_L(\C),$ and show that it can be obtained from the Betti numbers of such a minimal free resolution. We compare $d_L(\C)$ to two previously studied dimension bounds, obtained from Helly's theorem and the simplicial homology of $Δ(\C)$. Finally, we show explicitly how $d_L(\C)$ can be computed algebraically, and illustrate this with examples.

Neural codes allow the brain to represent, process, and store information about the world. Combinatorial codes, comprised of binary patterns of neural activity, encode information via the collective behavior of populations of neurons. A code is called convex if its codewords correspond to regions defined by an arrangement of convex open sets in Euclidean space. Convex codes have been observed experimentally in many brain areas, including sensory cortices and the hippocampus, where neurons exhibit convex receptive fields. What makes a neural code convex? That is, how can we tell from the intrinsic structure of a code if there exists a corresponding arrangement of convex open sets? In this work, we provide a complete characterization of local obstructions to convexity. This motivates us to define max intersection-complete codes, a family guaranteed to have no local obstructions. We then show how our characterization enables one to use free resolutions of Stanley-Reisner ideals in order to detect violations of convexity. Taken together, these results provide a significant advance in understanding the intrinsic combinatorial properties of convex codes.

Neurons in the brain represent external stimuli via neural codes. These codes often arise from stereotyped stimulus-response maps, associating to each neuron a convex receptive field. An important problem confronted by the brain is to infer properties of a represented stimulus space without knowledge of the receptive fields, using only the intrinsic structure of the neural code. How does the brain do this? To address this question, it is important to determine what stimulus space features can - in principle - be extracted from neural codes. This motivates us to define the neural ring and a related neural ideal, algebraic objects that encode the full combinatorial data of a neural code. Our main finding is that these objects can be expressed in a "canonical form" that directly translates to a minimal description of the receptive field structure intrinsic to the code. We also find connections to Stanley-Reisner rings, and use ideas similar to those in the theory of monomial ideals to obtain an algorithm for computing the primary decomposition of pseudo-monomial ideals. This allows us to algorithmically extract the canonical form associated to any neural code, providing the groundwork for inferring stimulus space features from neural activity alone.

Networks of neurons in the brain encode preferred patterns of neural activity via their synaptic connections. Despite receiving considerable attention, the precise relationship between network connectivity and encoded patterns is still poorly understood. Here we consider this problem for networks of threshold-linear neurons whose computational function is to learn and store a set of binary patterns (e.g., a neural code) as "permitted sets" of the network. We introduce a simple Encoding Rule that selectively turns "on" synapses between neurons that co-appear in one or more patterns. The rule uses synapses that are binary, in the sense of having only two states ("on" or "off"), but also heterogeneous, with weights drawn from an underlying synaptic strength matrix S. Our main results precisely describe the stored patterns that result from the Encoding Rule -- including unintended "spurious" states -- and give an explicit characterization of the dependence on S. In particular, we find that binary patterns are successfully stored in these networks when the excitatory connections between neurons are geometrically balanced -- i.e., they satisfy a set of geometric constraints. Furthermore, we find that certain types of neural codes are "natural" in the context of these networks, meaning that the full code can be accurately learned from a highly undersampled set of patterns. Interestingly, many commonly observed neural codes in cortical and hippocampal areas are natural in this sense. As an application, we construct networks that encode hippocampal place field codes nearly exactly, following presentation of only a small fraction of patterns. To obtain our results, we prove new theorems using classical ideas from convex and distance geometry, such as Cayley-Menger determinants, revealing a novel connection between these areas of mathematics and coding properties of neural networks.