arXiv++ Combinatorics

Discrete Morse theory emerged as an essential tool for computational geometry and topology. Its core structures are discrete gradient fields, defined as acyclic matchings on a complex $C$, from which topological and geometrical informations of $C$ can be efficiently computed, in particular its homology or Morse-Smale decomposition. Given a function $f$ sampled on $C$, it is possible to derive a discrete gradient that mimics the dynamics of $f$. Many such constructions are based on some variant of a greedy pairing of adjacent cells, given an appropriate weighting. However, proving that the dynamics of $f$ is correctly captured by this process is usually intricate. This work introduces the notion of discrete smoothness of the pair $(f,C)$, as a minimal sampling condition to ensure that the discrete gradient is geometrically faithful to $f$. More precisely, a discrete gradient construction from a function $f$ on a polyhedron complex $C$ of any dimension is studied, leading to theoretical guarantees prior to the discrete smoothness assumption. Those results are then extended and completed for the smooth case. As an application, a purely combinatorial proof that all CAT(0) cube complexes are collapsible is given.

In three-dimensional computational topology, the theory of normal surfaces is a tool of great theoretical and practical significance. Although this theory typically leads to exponential time algorithms, very little is known about how these algorithms perform in "typical" scenarios, or how far the best known theoretical bounds are from the real worst-case scenarios. Here we study the combinatorial and algebraic complexity of normal surfaces from both the theoretical and experimental viewpoints. Theoretically, we obtain new exponential lower bounds on the worst-case complexities in a variety of settings that are important for practical computation. Experimentally, we study the worst-case and average-case complexities over a comprehensive body of roughly three billion input triangulations. Many of our lower bounds are the first known exponential lower bounds in these settings, and experimental evidence suggests that many of our theoretical lower bounds on worst-case growth rates may indeed be asymptotically tight.