arXiv++ Combinatorics

For integers $n\geq k\geq 1$, the Kneser graph $K(n,k)$ is the graph with vertex set $V=[n]^{(k)}$ and edge set $E=\{\{x,y\} \in V^{(2)}: x\cap y=\emptyset\}$. Chen proved that for $n\geq 3k$, Kneser graphs are Hamiltonian and later improved this to $n\geq 2.62k+1$. Furthermore, Chen and Füredi gave a short proof that if $k | n$, Kneser graphs are Hamiltonian for $n\geq 3k$. In this note, we present a short proof that does not need the divisibility condition, i.e., we give a short proof that $K(n,k)$ is Hamiltonian for $n\geq 4k$.

For $k,n\in \mathbb{N}$, the Kneser graph $K(n,k)$ is the graph with vertex set $V=[n]^{(k)}$ and edge set $E=\{\{x,y\} \in V^{(2)}: x\cap y=\emptyset\}$. Chen proved that for $n\geq 3k$, Kneser graphs are Hamiltonian. Similarly as for graphs with Hajnal's and Szemerédi's result about a minimum degree condition for clique factors and the Pósa-Seymour Conjecture together with its solution for large graphs due to Komlós, Sárközy, and Szemerédi, the next step is to ask for clique factors and powers of Hamiltonian cycles in Kneser graphs. For $k,\ell\in \mathbb{N}$, let $n(k,\ell)$ be the smallest integer such that for $n\geq n(k,\ell)$, $K(n,k)$ contains the $\ell$-th power of a Hamiltonian cycle. Katona conjectured that for all but finitely many exceptions, $n(k,\ell)=(\ell+1)k+1$ holds. In particular, it would be interesting to know whether $n(k,\ell)$ is linear in $k$ (for fixed $\ell$). So far this is not known for $k\geq 2$. In this note, we take a first step towards such a linear bound by proving that for $\ell\in \mathbb{N}$, $k\geq \ell$ and $n\geq \ell ^3k$, all but at most $\ell-1$ vertices of $K(n,k)$ can be partitioned into cliques of size $\ell$. Further, we use our methods to extend a short proof due to Chen and Füredi that $K(n,k)$ is Hamiltonian for $n\geq 3k$ and $k \mid n$ to all $n\geq 4k$ if $k\geq 4$.