arXiv++ Combinatorics

The main result of this paper is that for any $c>0$ and for large enough $n$ if the number of edges in a 3-uniform hypergraph is at least $cn^2$ then there is a core (subgraph with minimum degree at least 2) on at most 15 vertices. We conjecture that our result is not sharp and 15 can be replaced by 9. Such an improvement seems to be out of reach, since it would imply the following case of a long-standing conjecture by Brown, Erd\H os, and Sós; if there is no set of 9 vertices that span at least 6 edges of a 3-uniform hypergraph then it is sparse.

We prove bounds on the number of incidences between a set of algebraic curves in $\mathbb{C}^2$ and a Cartesian product $A\times B$ with finite sets $A,B\subset \mathbb{C}$. Similar bounds are known under various conditions, but we show that the Cartesian product assumption leads to a simpler proof. This assumption holds in a number of interesting applications, and with our bound these applications can be extended from $\mathbb{R}$ to $\mathbb{C}$. The proof is a new application of the polynomial partitioning technique introduced by Guth and Katz.

Let $p_1,p_2,p_3$ be three distinct points in the plane, and, for $i=1,2,3$, let $\mathcal C_i$ be a family of $n$ unit circles that pass through $p_i$. We address a conjecture made by Székely, and show that the number of points incident to a circle of each family is $O(n^{11/6})$, improving an earlier bound for this problem due to Elekes, Simonovits, and Szabó [Combin. Probab. Comput., 2009]. The problem is a special instance of a more general problem studied by Elekes and Szabó [Combinatorica, 2012] (and by Elekes and Rónyai [J. Combin. Theory Ser. A, 2000]).

In this paper we characterize real bivariate polynomials which have a small range over large Cartesian products. We show that for every constant-degree bivariate real polynomial $f$, either $|f(A,B)|=Ω(n^{4/3})$, for every pair of finite sets $A,B\subset{\mathbb R}$, with $|A|=|B|=n$ (where the constant of proportionality depends on ${\rm deg} f$), or else $f$ must be of one of the special forms $f(u,v)=h(\varphi(u)+ψ(v))$, or $f(u,v)=h(\varphi(u)\cdotψ(v))$, for some univariate polynomials $\varphi,ψ,h$ over ${\mathbb R}$. This significantly improves a result of Elekes and Rónyai (2000). Our results are cast in a more general form, in which we give an upper bound for the number of zeros of $z=f(x,y)$ on a triple Cartesian product $A\times B\times C$, when the sizes $|A|$, $|B|$, $|C|$ need not be the same; the upper bound is $O(n^{11/6})$ when $|A|=|B|=|C|=n$, where the constant of proportionality depends on ${\rm deg} f$, unless $f$ has one of the aforementioned special forms. This result provides a unified tool for improving bounds in various Erd\H os-type problems in geometry and additive combinatorics. Several applications of our results to problems of these kinds are presented. For example, we show that the number of distinct distances between $n$ points lying on a constant-degree parametric algebraic curve which does not contain a line, in any dimension, is $Ω(n^{4/3})$, extending the result of Pach and de Zeeuw (2013) and improving the bound of Charalambides (2012), for the special case where the curve under consideration has a polynomial parameterization. We also derive improved lower bounds for several variants of the sum-product problem in additive combinatorics.

The Subspace Theorem is a powerful tool in number theory. It has appeared in various forms and been adapted and improved over time. It's applications include diophantine approximation, results about integral points on algebraic curves and the construction of transcendental numbers. But its usefulness extends beyond the realms of number theory. Other applications of the Subspace Theorem include linear recurrence sequences and finite automata. In fact, these structures are closely related to each other and the construction of transcendental numbers. The Subspace Theorem also has a number of remarkable combinatorial applications. The purpose of this paper is to give a survey of some of these applications including sum-product estimates and bounds on unit distances. The presentation will be from the point of view of a discrete mathematician. We will state a number of variants of the Subspace Theorem below but we will not prove any of them as the proofs are beyond the scope of this work. However we will give a proof of a simplified special case of the Subspace Theorem which is still very useful for many problems in discrete mathematics.

The first open case of the Brown, Erdős, Sós conjecture is equivalent to the following; For every $c>0$ there is a threshold $n_0$ so that if a quasigroup has order $n\geq n_0$ then for every subset of triples of the form $(a,b,ab),$ denoted by $S,$ if $|S|\geq cn^2$ then there is a seven-element subset of the quasigroup which spans at least four triples of the selected subset $S.$ In this paper we prove the conjecture for finite groups.

Let $p_1,p_2,p_3$ be three non-collinear points in the plane, and let $P$ be a set of $n$ other points in the plane. We show that the number of distinct distances between $p_1,p_2,p_3$ and the points of $P$ is $Ω(n^{6/11})$, improving the lower bound $Ω(n^{0.502})$ of Elekes and Szabó \cite{ESz} (and considerably simplifying the analysis).

Let P_1 and P_2 be two sets of points in the plane, so that P_1 is contained in a line L_1, P_2 is contained in a line L_2, and L_1 and L_2 are neither parallel nor orthogonal. Then the number of distinct distances determined by the pairs of P_1xP_2 is Ω(\min{|P_1|^{2/3}|P_2|^{2/3},|P_1|^2, |P_2|^2}). In particular, if |P_1|=|P_2|=m, then the number of these distinct distances is Ω(m^{4/3}), improving upon the previous bound Ω(m^{5/4}) of Elekes.

Let $F(x,y)$ be a polynomial over the rationals. We show that if $F$ is not an expander (over the rationals) then it has a special multiplicative or additive form. For example if $F$ is a homogeneous non-expander polynomial then $F(x,y)=c(x+ay)^α$ or $F(x,y)=c(xy)^α.$ This is an extension of an earlier result of Elekes and Rónyai who described the structure of two-variate polynomials which are not expanders over the reals.

Many problems in combinatorial geometry can be formulated in terms of curves or surfaces containing many points of a cartesian product. In 2000, Elekes and Rónyai proved that if the graph of a polynomial contains $cn^2$ points of an $n\times n\times n$ cartesian product in $\mathbb{R}^3$, then the polynomial has the form $f(x,y)=g(k(x)+l(y))$ or $f(x,y)=g(k(x)l(y))$. They used this to prove a conjecture of Purdy which states that given two lines in $\mathbb{R}^2$ and $n$ points on each line, if the number of distinct distances between pairs of points, one on each line, is at most $cn$, then the lines are parallel or orthogonal. We extend the Elekes-Rónyai Theorem to a less symmetric cartesian product. We also extend the Elekes-Rónyai Theorem to one dimension higher on an $n\times n\times n\times n$ cartesian product and an asymmetric cartesian product. We give a proof of a variation of Purdy's conjecture with fewer points on one of the lines. We finish with a lower bound for our main result in one dimension higher with asymmetric cartesian product, showing that it is near-optimal.

We prove Roth type theorems in finite groups. Our main tool is the Triangle Removal Lemma of Ruzsa and Szemerédi.

Extending Furstenberg's ergodic theoretic proof for Szemerédi's theorem on arithmetic progressions, Furstenberg and Weiss (2003) proved the following qualitative result. For every d and k, there exists an integer N such that no matter how we color the vertices of a complete binary tree T_N of depth N with k colors, we can find a monochromatic replica of T_d in T_N such that (1) all vertices at the same level in T_d are mapped into vertices at the same level in T_N; (2) if a vertex x of T_d is mapped into a vertex y in T_N, then the two children of x are mapped into descendants of the the two children of y in T_N, respectively; and 3 the levels occupied by this replica form an arithmetic progression. This result and its density versions imply van der Waerden's and Szemerédi's theorems, and laid the foundations of a new Ramsey theory for trees. Using simple counting arguments and a randomized coloring algorithm called random split, we prove the following related result. Let N=N(d,k) denote the smallest positive integer such that no matter how we color the vertices of a complete binary tree T_N of depth N with k colors, we can find a monochromatic replica of T_d in T_N which satisfies properties (1) and (2) above. Then we have N(d,k)=Θ(dk\log k). We also prove a density version of this result, which, combined with Szemerédi's theorem, provides a very short combinatorial proof of a quantitative version of the Furstenberg-Weiss theorem.

For every $k>3$, we give a construction of planar point sets with many collinear $k$-tuples and no collinear $(k+1)$-tuples. We show that there are $n_0=n_0(k)$ and $c=c(k)$ such that if $n\geq n_0$, then there exists a set of $n$ points in the plane that does not contain $k+1$ points on a line, but it contains at least $n^{2-\frac{c}{\sqrt{\log n}}}$ collinear $k$-tuples of points. Thus, we significantly improve the previously best known lower bound for the largest number of collinear $k$-tuples in such a set, and get reasonably close to the trivial upper bound $O(n^2)$.

We prove almost tight bounds on incidences between points and $k$-dimensional varieties of bounded degree in $\R^d$. Our main tools are the Polynomial Ham Sandwich Theorem and induction on both the dimension and the number of points.

In 1946 Erd\H os asked for the maximum number of unit distances, $u(n)$, among $n$ points in the plane. He showed that $u(n)> n^{1+c/\log\log n}$ and conjectured that this was the true magnitude. The best known upper bound is $u(n)<cn^{4/3}$, due to Spencer, Szemerédi and Trotter. We show that the upper bound $n^{1+6/\sqrt{\log n}}$ holds if we only consider unit distances with rational angle, by which we mean that the line through the pair of points makes a rational angle in degrees with the x-axis. Using an algebraic theorem of Mann we get a uniform bound on the number of paths between two fixed vertices in the unit distance graph, giving a contradiction if there are too many unit distances with rational angle. This bound holds if we consider rational distances instead of unit distances as long as there are no three points on a line. A superlinear lower bound is given, due to Erd\H os and Purdy. If we have at most $n^α$ points on a line then we get the bound $O(n^{1+α})$ or $n^{1+α+6/\sqrt{\log n}}$ for the number of rational distances with rational angle depending on whether $α\ge 1/2$ or $α< 1/2$ respectively.

A simultaneous arithmetic progression (s.a.p.) of length k consists of k points (x_i, y_σ(i)), where x_i and y_i are arithmetic progressions and σis a permutation. Garcia-Selfa and Tornero asked whether there is a bound on the length of an s.a.p. on an elliptic curve in Weierstrass form over Q. We show that 4319 is such a bound for curves over R. This is done by considering translates of the curve in a grid as a graph. A simple upper bound is found for the number of crossings and the 'crossing inequality' gives a lower bound. Together these bound the length of an s.a.p. on the curve. We then use a similar method to extend the result to arbitrary real algebraic curves. Instead of considering s.a.p.'s we consider k^2/3 points in a grid. The number of crossings is bounded by Bezout's Theorem. We then give another proof using a result of Jarnik bounding the number of grid points on a convex curve. This result applies as any real algebraic curve can be broken up into convex and concave parts, the number of which depend on the degree. Lastly, these results are extended to complex algebraic curves.

In this note we establish a Ramsey-type result for certain subsets of the $n$-dimensional cube. This can then be applied to obtain reasonable bounds on various related structures, such as (partial) Hales-Jewett lines for alphabets of sized 3 and 4, Hilbert cubes in sets of real numbers with small sumsets, "corner" in the integer lattice in the plane, and 3-term geometric progressions in integers.

Ulam asked in 1945 if there is an everywhere dense \emph{rational set}, i.e. a point set in the plane with all its pairwise distances rational. Erd\H os conjectured that if a set $S$ has a dense rational subset, then $S$ should be very special. The only known types of examples of sets with dense (or even just infinite) rational subsets are lines and circles. In this paper we prove Erd\H os's conjecture for algebraic curves, by showing that no irreducible algebraic curve other than a line or a circle contains an infinite rational set.

We prove that the sumset or the productset of any finite set of real numbers, $A,$ is at least $|A|^{4/3-ε},$ improving earlier bounds. Our main tool is a new upper bound on the multiplicative energy, $E(A,A).$

We present some elementary ideas to prove the following Sylvester-Gallai type theorems involving incidences between points and lines in the planes over the complex numbers and quaternions. (1) Let A and B be finite sets of at least two complex numbers each. Then there exists a line l in the complex affine plane such that l intersects AxB in exactly two points. (2) Let S be a finite noncollinear set of points in the complex affine plane. Then there exists a line l intersecting S in 2, 3, 4 or 5 points. (3) Let A and B be finite sets of at least two quaternions each. Then there exists a line l in the quaternionic affine plane such that l intersects AxB in 2, 3, 4 or 5 points. (4) Let S be a finite noncollinear set of points in the quaternionic affine plane. Then there exists a line l intersecting S in at least 2 and at most 24 points.