arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Micha Sharir

37 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
2026-02-11
Implicit representations via the polynomial method
Semialgebraic graphs are graphs whose vertices are points in $\mathbb{R}^d$, and adjacency between two vertices is determined by the truth value of a semialgebraic predicate of constant complexity. We show how to harness polynomial partitioning methods to construct compact adjacency labeling schemes for families of semialgebraic graphs. That is, we show that for any family of semialgebraic graphs, given a graph on $n$ vertices in this family, we can assign a label consisting of $O(n^{1-2/(d+1) + \varepsilon})$ bits to each vertex (where $\varepsilon > 0$ can be made arbitrarily small and the constant of proportionality depends on $\varepsilon$ and on the complexity of the adjacency-defining predicate), such that adjacency between two vertices can be determined solely from their two labels, without any additional information. We obtain for instance that unit disk graphs and segment intersection graphs have such labelings with labels of $O(n^{1/3 + \varepsilon})$ bits. This is in contrast to their natural implicit representation consisting of the coordinates of the disk centers or segment endpoints, which sometimes require exponentially many bits. It also improves on the best known bound of $O(n^{1-1/d}\log n)$ for $d$-dimensional semialgebraic families due to Alon (Discrete Comput. Geom., 2024), a bound that holds more generally for graphs with shattering functions bounded by a degree-$d$ polynomial. We also give new bounds on the size of adjacency labels for other families of graphs. In particular, we consider semilinear graphs, which are semialgebraic graphs in which the predicate only involves linear polynomials. We show that semilinear graphs have adjacency labels of size $O(\log n)$. We also prove that polygon visibility graphs, which are not semialgebraic in the above sense, have adjacency labels of size $O(\log^3 n)$.
2024-12-06
Covering points by hyperplanes and related problems
Published in SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics (2025), 39(4): 2242 - 2249 • View PublicationBIB
For a set $P$ of $n$ points in $\mathbb R^d$, for any $d\ge 2$, a hyperplane $h$ is called $k$-rich with respect to $P$ if it contains at least $k$ points of $P$. Answering and generalizing a question asked by Peyman Afshani, we show that if the number of $k$-rich hyperplanes in $\mathbb R^d$, $d \geq 3$, is at least $Ω(n^d/k^α+ n/k)$, with a sufficiently large constant of proportionality and with $d\le α< 2d-1$, then there exists a $(d-2)$-flat that contains $Ω(k^{(2d-1-α)/(d-1)})$ points of $P$. We also present upper bound constructions that give instances in which the above lower bound is tight. An extension of our analysis yields similar lower bounds for $k$-rich spheres or $k$-rich flats.
2020-12-22 v2
On rich points and incidences with restricted sets of lines in 3-space
Let $L$ be a set of $n$ lines in $R^3$ that is contained, when represented as points in the four-dimensional Plücker space of lines in $R^3$, in an irreducible variety $T$ of constant degree which is \emph{non-degenerate} with respect to $L$ (see below). We show: \medskip \noindent{\bf (1)} If $T$ is two-dimensional, the number of $r$-rich points (points incident to at least $r$ lines of $L$) is $O(n^{4/3+ε}/r^2)$, for $r \ge 3$ and for any $ε>0$, and, if at most $n^{1/3}$ lines of $L$ lie on any common regulus, there are at most $O(n^{4/3+ε})$ $2$-rich points. For $r$ larger than some sufficiently large constant, the number of $r$-rich points is also $O(n/r)$. As an application, we deduce (with an $ε$-loss in the exponent) the bound obtained by Pach and de Zeeuw (2107) on the number of distinct distances determined by $n$ points on an irreducible algebraic curve of constant degree in the plane that is not a line nor a circle. \medskip \noindent{\bf (2)} If $T$ is two-dimensional, the number of incidences between $L$ and a set of $m$ points in $R^3$ is $O(m+n)$. \medskip \noindent{\bf (3)} If $T$ is three-dimensional and nonlinear, the number of incidences between $L$ and a set of $m$ points in $R^3$ is $O\left(m^{3/5}n^{3/5} + (m^{11/15}n^{2/5} + m^{1/3}n^{2/3})s^{1/3} + m + n \right)$, provided that no plane contains more than $s$ of the points. When $s = O(\min\{n^{3/5}/m^{2/5}, m^{1/2}\})$, the bound becomes $O(m^{3/5}n^{3/5}+m+n)$. As an application, we prove that the number of incidences between $m$ points and $n$ lines in $R^4$ contained in a quadratic hypersurface (which does not contain a hyperplane) is $O(m^{3/5}n^{3/5} + m + n)$. The proofs use, in addition to various tools from algebraic geometry, recent bounds on the number of incidences between points and algebraic curves in the plane.
2020-12-08
On rich lenses in planar arrangements of circles and related problems
Published • View PublicationBIB
We show that the maximum number of pairwise non-overlapping $k$-rich lenses (lenses formed by at least $k$ circles) in an arrangement of $n$ circles in the plane is $O\left(\frac{n^{3/2}\log{(n/k^3)}}{k^{5/2}} + \frac{n}{k} \right)$, and the sum of the degrees of the lenses of such a family (where the degree of a lens is the number of circles that form it) is $O\left(\frac{n^{3/2}\log{(n/k^3)}}{k^{3/2}} + n\right)$. Two independent proofs of these bounds are given, each interesting in its own right (so we believe). We then show that these bounds lead to the known bound of Agarwal et al. (JACM 2004) and Marcus and Tardos (JCTA 2006) on the number of point-circle incidences in the plane. Extensions to families of more general algebraic curves and some other related problems are also considered.
2020-07-07
Incidences with curves in three dimensions
We study incidence problems involving points and curves in $R^3$. The current (and in fact only viable) approach to such problems, pioneered by Guth and Katz, requires a variety of tools from algebraic geometry, most notably (i) the polynomial partitioning technique, and (ii) the study of algebraic surfaces that are ruled by lines or, in more recent studies, by algebraic curves of some constant degree. By exploiting and refining these tools, we obtain new and improved bounds for point-curve incidence problems in $R^3$. Incidences of this kind have been considered in several previous studies, starting with Guth and Katz's work on points and lines. Our results, which are based on the work of Guth and Zahl concerning surfaces that are doubly ruled by curves, provide a grand generalization of most of the previous results. We reconstruct the bound for points and lines, and improve, in certain significant ways, recent bounds involving points and circles (in Sharir, Sheffer and Zahl), and points and arbitrary constant-degree algebraic curves (in Sharir, Sheffer and Solomon). While in these latter instances the bounds are not known (and are strongly suspected not) to be tight, our bounds are, in a certain sense, the best that can be obtained with this approach, given the current state of knowledge. As an application of our point-curve incidence bound, we show that the number of triangles spanned by a set of $n$ points in $R^3$ and similar to a given triangle is $O(n^{15/7})$, which improves the bound of Agarwal et al. Our results are also related to a study by Guth et al.~(work in progress), and have been recently applied in Sharir, Solomon and Zlydenko to related incidence problems in three dimensions.
2020-03-04 v3
Incidences between points and curves with almost two degrees of freedom
Published • View PublicationBIB
We study incidences between points and algebraic curves in three dimensions, taken from a family $C$ of curves that have almost two degrees of freedom, meaning that every pair of curves intersect in $O(1)$ points, for any pair of points $p$, $q$, there are only $O(1)$ curves of $C$ that pass through both points, and a pair $p$, $q$ of points admit a curve of $C$ that passes through both of them iff $F(p,q)=0$ for some polynomial $F$. We study two specific instances, one involving unit circles in $R^3$ that pass through some fixed point (so called anchored unit circles), and the other involving tangencies between directed points (points and directions) and circles in the plane; a directed point is tangent to a circle if the point lies on the circle and the direction is the tangent direction. A lifting transformation of Ellenberg et al. maps these tangencies to incidences between points and curves in three dimensions. In both instances the curves in $R^3$ have almost two degrees of freedom. We show that the number of incidences between $m$ points and $n$ anchored unit circles in $R^3$, as well as the number of tangencies between $m$ directed points and $n$ arbitrary circles in the plane, is $O(m^{3/5}n^{3/5}+m+n)$. We derive a similar incidence bound, with a few additional terms, for more general families of curves in $R^3$ with almost two degrees of freedom. The proofs follow standard techniques, based on polynomial partitioning, but face a novel issue involving surfaces that are infinitely ruled by the respective family of curves, as well as surfaces in a dual 3D space that are infinitely ruled by the respective family of suitably defined dual curves. The general bound that we obtain is $O(m^{3/5}n^{3/5}+m+n)$ plus additional terms that depend on how many curves or dual curves can lie on an infinitely-ruled surface.
2016-12-15
Distinct distances between a collinear set and an arbitrary set of points
Published • View PublicationBIB
We consider the number of distinct distances between two finite sets of points in ${\bf R}^k$, for any constant dimension $k\ge 2$, where one set $P_1$ consists of $n$ points on a line $l$, and the other set $P_2$ consists of $m$ arbitrary points, such that no hyperplane orthogonal to $l$ and no hypercylinder having $l$ as its axis contains more than $O(1)$ points of $P_2$. The number of distinct distances between $P_1$ and $P_2$ is then $$ Ω\left(\min\left\{ n^{2/3}m^{2/3},\; \frac{n^{10/11}m^{4/11}}{\log^{2/11}m},\; n^2,\; m^2\right\}\right) . $$ Without the assumption on $P_2$, there exist sets $P_1$, $P_2$ as above, with only $O(m+n)$ distinct distances between them.
2016-10-05 v2
Incidences with curves and surfaces in three dimensions, with applications to distinct and repeated distances
Published • View PublicationBIB
We study a wide spectrum of incidence problems involving points and curves or points and surfaces in $\mathbb R^3$. The current (and in fact the only viable) approach to such problems, pioneered by Guth and Katz [2010,2015], requires a variety of tools from algebraic geometry, most notably (i) the polynomial partitioning technique, and (ii) the study of algebraic surfaces that are ruled by lines or, in more recent studies [Guth-Zahl 2016], by algebraic curves of some constant degree. By exploiting and refining these tools, we obtain new and improved bounds for numerous incidence problems in $\mathbb R^3$. In broad terms, we consider two kinds of problems, those involving points and constant-degree algebraic \emph{curves}, and those involving points and constant-degree algebraic \emph{surfaces}. In some variants we assume that the points lie on some fixed constant-degree algebraic variety, and in others we consider arbitrary sets of points in 3-space. our results provide a "grand generalization" of most of the previous studies of (special instances of) previous works for both curves and surfaces. As an application of our point-curve incidence bound, we consider the problem of bounding the number of similar triangles spanned by a set of $n$ points in $\mathbb R^3$, and obtain the bound $O(n^{15/7}),$ thus improving the bound of Agarwal et al [2007]. As applications of our point-surface incidence bounds, we consider the problems of distinct and repeated distances determined by a set of $n$ points in $\mathbb R^3$, two of the most celebrated open problems in combinatorial geometry. We obtain new and improved bounds for two special cases, one in which the points lie on some algebraic variety of constant degree, and one involving incidences between pairs in $P_1\times P_2$, where $P_1$ is contained in a variety and $P_2$ is arbitrary.
2016-09-28
Incidences between points and lines on two- and three-dimensional varieties
Published • View PublicationBIB
Let $P$ be a set of $m$ points and $L$ a set of $n$ lines in $\mathbb R^4$, such that the points of $P$ lie on an algebraic three-dimensional surface of degree $D$ that does not contain hyperplane or quadric components, and no 2-flat contains more than $s$ lines of $L$. We show that the number of incidences between $P$ and $L$ is $$ I(P,L) = O\left(m^{1/2}n^{1/2}D + m^{2/3}n^{1/3}s^{1/3} + nD + m\right) , $$ for some absolute constant of proportionality. This significantly improves the bound of the authors, for arbitrary sets of points and lines in $\mathbb R^4$, when $D$ is not too large. The same bound holds when the three-dimensional surface is embedded in any higher dimensional space. For the proof of this bound, we revisit certain parts of [Sharir-Solomon16], combined with the following new incidence bound. Let $P$ be a set of $m$ points and $L$ a set of $n$ lines in $\mathbb R^d$, for $d\ge 3$, which lie in a common two-dimensional algebraic surface of degree $D$ (assumed to be $\ll n^{1/2}$) that does not contain any 2-flat, so that no 2-flat contains more than $s$ lines of $L$ (here we require that the lines of $L$ also be contained in the surface). Then the number of incidences between $P$ and $L$ is $$ I(P,L) = O\left(m^{1/2}n^{1/2}D^{1/2} + m^{2/3}D^{2/3}s^{1/3} + m + n\right). $$ When $d=3$, this improves the bound of Guth and Katz for this special case, when $D \ll n^{1/2}$. Moreover, the bound does not involve the term $O(nD)$, that arises in most standard approaches, and its removal is a significant aspect of our result. Finally, we also obtain (slightly weaker) variants of both results over the complex field. For two-dimensional varieties, the bound is as in the real case, with an added term of $O(D^3)$. For three-dimensional varieties, the bound is as in the real case, with an added term of $O(D^6)$.
2016-07-13 v2
The Elekes-Szabó Theorem in four dimensions
Published • View PublicationBIB
Let $F\in\mathbb{C}[x,y,s,t]$ be an irreducible constant-degree polynomial, and let $A,B,C,D\subset\mathbb{C}$ be finite sets of size $n$. We show that $F$ vanishes on at most $O(n^{8/3})$ points of the Cartesian product $A\times B\times C\times D$, unless $F$ has a special group-related form. A similar statement holds for $A,B,C,D$ of unequal sizes. This is a four-dimensional extension of our recent improved analysis of the original Elekes-Szabó theorem in three dimensions. We give three applications: an expansion bound for three-variable real polynomials that do not have a special form, a bound on the number of coplanar quadruples on a space curve that is neither planar nor quartic, and a bound on the number of four-point circles on a plane curve that has degree at least five.
2016-04-26
Cutting Algebraic Curves into Pseudo-segments and Applications
Published in J. Combin. Theory Ser. A. 150: 1--35, 2017 • View PublicationBIB
We show that a set of $n$ algebraic plane curves of constant maximum degree can be cut into $O(n^{3/2}\operatorname{polylog} n)$ Jordan arcs, so that each pair of arcs intersect at most once, i.e., they form a collection of pseudo-segments. This extends a similar (and slightly better) bound for pseudo-circles due to Marcus and Tardos. Our result is based on a technique of Ellenberg, Solymosi and Zahl that transforms arrangements of plane curves into arrangements of space curves, so that lenses (pairs of subarcs of the curves that intersect at least twice) become vertical depth cycles. We then apply a variant of a technique of Aronov and Sharir to eliminate these depth cycles by making a small number of cuts, which corresponds to a small number of cuts to the original planar arrangement of curves. After these cuts have been performed, the resulting curves form a collection of pseudo-segments. Our cutting bound leads to new incidence bounds between points and constant-degree algebraic curves. The conditions for these incidence bounds are slightly stricter than those for the current best-known bound of Pach and Sharir; for our result to hold, the curves must be algebraic and of bounded maximum degree, while Pach and Sharir's bound only imposes weaker, purely topological constraints on the curves. However, when our conditions hold, the new bounds are superior for almost all ranges of parameters. We also obtain new bounds on the complexity of a single level in an arrangement of constant-degree algebraic curves, and a new bound on the complexity of many marked faces in an arrangement of such curves.
2016-04-06
Distinct and repeated distances on a surface and incidences between points and spheres
In this paper we show that the number of distinct distances determined by a set of $n$ points on a constant-degree two-dimensional algebraic variety $V$ (i.e., a surface) in $\mathbb R^3$ is at least $Ω\left(n^{7/9}/{\rm polylog} \,n\right)$. This bound is significantly larger than the conjectured bound $Ω(n^{2/3})$ for general point sets in $\mathbb R^3$. We also show that the number of unit distances determined by $n$ points on a surface $V$, as above, is $O(n^{4/3})$, a bound that matches the best known planar bound, and is worst-case tight in 3-space. This is in sharp contrast with the best known general bound $O(n^{3/2})$ for points in three dimensions. To prove these results, we establish an improved upper bound for the number of incidences between a set $P$ of $m$ points and a set $S$ of $n$ spheres, of arbitrary radii, in $\mathbb R^3$, provided that the points lie on an algebraic surface $V$ of constant degree, which does not have linear or spherical components. Specifically, the bound is $$ O\left( m^{2/3}n^{2/3} + m^{1/2}n^{7/8}\log^β(m^4/n) + m + n + \sum_{c} |P_{c}|\cdot |S_{c}| \right) , $$ where the constant of proportionality and the constant exponent $β$ depend on the degree of $V$, and where the sum ranges over all circles $c$ that are fully contained in $V$, so that, for each such $c$, $P_c = P\cap c$ and $S_c$ is the set of the spheres of $S$ that contain $c$. In addition, $\sum_{c} |P_{c}| = O(m)$ and $\sum_{c} |S_{c}| = O(n)$. This bound too improves upon earlier known bounds. These have been obtained for arbitrary point sets but only under severe restrictions about the spheres, which are dropped in our result. Another interesting application of our result is an incidence bound for arbitrary points and spheres in 3-space, where we improve and generalize the previous work of Apfelbaum and Sharir[AS].
2016-03-15 v2
Incidences between points on a variety and planes in R^3
In this paper we establish an improved bound for the number of incidences between a set $P$ of $m$ points and a set $H$ of $n$ planes in $\mathbb R^3$, provided that the points lie on a two-dimensional nonlinear irreducible algebraic variety $V$ of constant degree. Specifically, the bound is $$ O\left( m^{2/3}n^{2/3} + m^{6/11}n^{9/11}\log^β(m^3/n) + m + n + \sum_\ell |P_\ell|\cdot |H_\ell| \right) , $$ where the constant of proportionality and the constant exponent $β$ depend on the degree of $V$, and where the sum ranges over all lines $\ell$ that are fully contained in $V$ and contain at least one point of $P$, so that, for each such $\ell$, $P_\ell = P\cap\ell$ and $H_\ell$ is the set of the planes of H that contain $\ell$. In addition, $\sum_\ell |P_\ell| = O(m)$ and $\sum_\ell |H_\ell| = O(n)$. This improves, for this special case, the earlier more general bound of Apfelbaum and Sharir (see also Brass and Knauer as well as Elekes and Tóth). This is a generalization of the incidence bound for points and circles in the plane (cf. Aronov et al., Aronov and Sharir, Marcus and Tardos), and is based on a recent result of Sharir and Zahl on the number of cuts that turn a collection of algebraic curves into pseudo-segments. The case where $V$ is a quadric is simpler to analyze, does not require the result of Sharir and Zahl, and yields the same bound as above, with $β=2/11$. We present an interesting application of our results to a problem, studied by Rudnev, on obtaining a lower bound on the number of distinct cross-ratios determined by $n$ real points, where our bound leads to a slight improvement in Rudnev's bound.
Distinct distances between points and lines
Published • View PublicationBIB
We show that for $m$ points and $n$ lines in the real plane, the number of distinct distances between the points and the lines is $Ω(m^{1/5}n^{3/5})$, as long as $m^{1/2}\le n\le m^2$. We also prove that for any $m$ points in the plane, not all on a line, the number of distances between these points and the lines that they span is $Ω(m^{4/3})$. The problem of bounding the number of distinct point-line distances can be reduced to the problem of bounding the number of tangent pairs among a finite set of lines and a finite set of circles in the plane, and we believe that this latter question is of independent interest. In the same vein, we show that $n$ circles in the plane determine at most $O(n^{3/2})$ points where two or more circles are tangent, improving the previously best known bound of $O(n^{3/2}\log n)$. Finally, we study three-dimensional versions of the distinct point-line distances problem, namely, distinct point-line distances and distinct point-plane distances. The problems studied in this paper are all new, and the bounds that we derive for them, albeit most likely not tight, are non-trivial to prove. We hope that our work will motivate further studies of these and related problems.
2015-12-27
Incidences with curves in R^d
Published • View PublicationBIB
We prove that the number of incidences between $m$ points and $n$ bounded-degree curves with $k$ degrees of freedom in ${\mathbb R}^d$ is \[ I(m,n) =O\left(m^{\frac{k}{dk-d+1}+\varepsilon}n^{\frac{dk-d}{dk-d+1}}+ \sum_{j=2}^{d-1} m^{\frac{k}{jk-j+1}+\varepsilon}n^{\frac{d(j-1)(k-1)}{(d-1)(jk-j+1)}}q_j^{\frac{(d-j)(k-1)}{(d-1)(jk-j+1)}}+m+n\right), \] for any $\varepsilon>0$, where the constant of proportionality depends on $k, \varepsilon$ and $d$, provided that no $j$-dimensional surface of degree $\le c_j(k,d,\varepsilon)$, a constant parameter depending on $k$, $d$, $j$, and $\varepsilon$, contains more than $q_j$ input curves, and that the $q_j$'s satisfy certain mild conditions. This bound generalizes a recent result of Sharir and Solomon concerning point-line incidences in four dimensions (where $d=4$ and $k=2$), and partly generalizes a recent result of Guth (as well as the earlier bound of Guth and Katz) in three dimensions (Guth's three-dimensional bound has a better dependency on $q_2$). It also improves a recent $d$-dimensional general incidence bound by Fox, Pach, Sheffer, Suk, and Zahl, in the special case of incidences with algebraic curves. Our results are also related to recent works by Dvir and Gopi and by Hablicsek and Scherr concerning rich lines in high-dimensional spaces.
2015-04-27
On the number of unit-area triangles spanned by convex grids in the plane
Published • View PublicationBIB
A finite set of real numbers is called convex if the differences between consecutive elements form a strictly increasing sequence. We show that, for any pair of convex sets $A, B\subset\mathbb R$, each of size $n^{1/2}$, the convex grid $A\times B$ spans at most $O(n^{37/17}\log^{2/17}n)$ unit-area triangles. This improves the best known upper bound $O(n^{31/14})$ recently obtained in \cite{RS}. Our analysis also applies to more general families of sets $A$, $B$, known as sets of Szemerédi--Trotter type.
2015-04-20
Polynomials vanishing on Cartesian products: The Elekes-Szabó Theorem revisited
Published in Duke Math. J. 165, no. 18 (2016), 3517-3566 • View PublicationBIB
Let $F\in\mathbb{C}[x,y,z]$ be a constant-degree polynomial,and let $A,B,C\subset\mathbb C$ be finite sets of size $n$. We show that $F$ vanishes on at most $O(n^{11/6})$ points of the Cartesian product $A\times B\times C$, unless $F$ has a special group-related form. This improves a theorem of Elekes and Szabó [Combinatorica, 2012], and generalizes a result of Raz, Sharir, and Solymosi [Amer. J. Math., to appear]. The same statement holds over $\mathbb{R}$, and a similar statement holds when $A, B, C$ have different sizes (with a more involved bound replacing $O(n^{11/6})$). This result provides a unified tool for improving bounds in various Erd\H os-type problems in combinatorial geometry, and we discuss several applications of this kind.
2015-01-13
Incidences between points and lines on a two-dimensional variety
Published • View PublicationBIB
We present a direct and fairly simple proof of the following incidence bound: Let $P$ be a set of $m$ points and $L$ a set of $n$ lines in ${\mathbb R}^d$, for $d\ge 3$, which lie in a common algebraic two-dimensional surface of degree $D$ that does not contain any 2-flat, so that no 2-flat contains more than $s \le D$ lines of $L$. Then the number of incidences between $P$ and $L$ is $$ I(P,L)=O\left(m^{1/2}n^{1/2}D^{1/2} + m^{2/3}\min\{n,D^{2}\}^{1/3}s^{1/3} + m + n\right). $$ When $d=3$, this improves the bound of Guth and Katz~\cite{GK2} for this special case, when $D$ is not too large. A supplementary feature of this work is a review, with detailed proofs, of several basic (and folklore) properties of ruled surfaces in three dimensions.
2015-01-12
Incidences between points and lines in three dimensions
Published • View PublicationBIB
We give a fairly elementary and simple proof that shows that the number of incidences between $m$ points and $n$ lines in ${\mathbb R}^3$, so that no plane contains more than $s$ lines, is $$ O\left(m^{1/2}n^{3/4}+ m^{2/3}n^{1/3}s^{1/3} + m + n\right) $$ (in the precise statement, the constant of proportionality of the first and third terms depends, in a rather weak manner, on the relation between $m$ and $n$). This bound, originally obtained by Guth and Katz~\cite{GK2} as a major step in their solution of Erd{\H o}s's distinct distances problem, is also a major new result in incidence geometry, an area that has picked up considerable momentum in the past six years. Its original proof uses fairly involved machinery from algebraic and differential geometry, so it is highly desirable to simplify the proof, in the interest of better understanding the geometric structure of the problem, and providing new tools for tackling similar problems. This has recently been undertaken by Guth~\cite{Gu14}. The present paper presents a different and simpler derivation, with better bounds than those in \cite{Gu14}, and without the restrictive assumptions made there. Our result has a potential for applications to other incidence problems in higher dimensions.
2015-01-02 v2
The number of unit-area triangles in the plane: Theme and variations
Published • View PublicationBIB
We show that the number of unit-area triangles determined by a set $S$ of $n$ points in the plane is $O(n^{20/9})$, improving the earlier bound $O(n^{9/4})$ of Apfelbaum and Sharir [Discrete Comput. Geom., 2010]. We also consider two special cases of this problem: (i) We show, using a somewhat subtle construction, that if $S$ consists of points on three lines, the number of unit-area triangles that $S$ spans can be $Ω(n^2)$, for any triple of lines (it is always $O(n^2)$ in this case). (ii) We show that if $S$ is a {\em convex grid} of the form $A\times B$, where $A$, $B$ are {\em convex} sets of $n^{1/2}$ real numbers each (i.e., the sequences of differences of consecutive elements of $A$ and of $B$ are both strictly increasing), then $S$ determines $O(n^{31/14})$ unit-area triangles.