arXiv++ Combinatorics

A tanglegram $\cal T$ consists of two rooted binary trees with the same number of leaves, and a perfect matching between the two leaf sets. In a layout, the tanglegrams is drawn with the leaves on two parallel lines, the trees on either side of the strip created by these lines are drawn as plane trees, and the perfect matching is drawn in straight line segments inside the strip. The tanglegram crossing number ${\rm cr}({\cal T})$ of $\cal T$ is the smallest number of crossings of pairs of matching edges, over all possible layouts of $\cal T$. The size of the tanglegram is the number of matching edges, say $n$. An earlier paper showed that the maximum of the tanglegram crossing number of size $n$ tanglegrams is $<\frac{1}{2}\binom{n}{2}$; but is at least $\frac{1}{2}\binom{n}{2}-\frac{n^{3/2}-n}{2}$ for infinitely many $n$. Now we make better bounds: the maximum crossing number of a size $n$ tanglegram is at most $ \frac{1}{2}\binom{n}{2}-\frac{n}{4}$, but for infinitely many $n$, at least $\frac{1}{2}\binom{n}{2}-\frac{n\log_2 n}{4}$. The problem shows analogy with the Unbalancing Lights Problem of Gale and Berlekamp.

A tree $T$ on $2^n$ vertices is called set-sequential if the elements in $V(T)\cup E(T)$ can be labeled with distinct nonzero $(n+1)$-dimensional $01$-vectors such that the vector labeling each edge is the component-wise sum modulo $2$ of the labels of the endpoints. It has been conjectured that all trees on $2^n$ vertices with only odd degree are set-sequential (the "Odd Tree Conjecture"), and in this paper, we present progress toward that conjecture. We show that certain kinds of caterpillars (with restrictions on the degrees of the vertices, but no restrictions on the diameter) are set-sequential. Additionally, we introduce some constructions of new set-sequential graphs from smaller set-sequential bipartite graphs (not necessarily odd trees). We also make a conjecture about pairings of the elements of $\mathbb{F}_2^n$ in a particular way; in the process, we provide a substantial clarification of a proof of a theorem that partitions $\mathbb{F}_2^n$ from a 2011 paper by Balister et al. Finally, we put forward a result on bipartite graphs that is a modification of a theorem in Balister et al.