arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study families of axis-aligned boxes in a $d$-dimensional Euclidean space $\mathbb{R}^d$ whose placement is restricted by bounds on the dimension of their pairwise intersections. More specifically, two such boxes in $\mathbb{R}^d$ are said to be \emph{$k$-neighborly} if their intersection has dimension at least $d-k$ and at most $d-1$. The maximum number of pairwise $k$-neighborly boxes in $\mathbb{R}^d$ is denoted by $n(k,d)$. It is known that $n(k,d)=Θ(d^k)$, for fixed $1\leqslant k\leqslant d$, however, exact formulas are known only in three cases: $k=1$, $k=d-1$, and $k=d$. In particular, the equality $n(1,d)=d+1$ is equivalent to the famous theorem of Graham and Pollak concerning partitions of complete graphs into complete bipartite graphs. In our main result we give a new construction of families of $k$-neighborly boxes which improves the lower bound for $n(k,d)$ when $k$ is close to $d$. Together with some recent upper bounds on $n(k,d)$, it gives the asymptotic equality $n(d-s,d)\thicksim\frac{2^s+1}{2^{s+1}}\cdot2^d$, for every fixed $s\leqslant d/2$. In our constructions we use a familiar interpretation of the problem in the language of Hamming cubes represented by binary strings with a special blank symbol, called \emph{joker}.

Two axis-aligned boxes in $\mathbb{R}^d$ are \emph{$k$-neighborly} if their intersection has dimension at least $d-k$ and at most $d-1$. The maximum number of pairwise $k$-neighborly boxes in $\mathbb{R}^d$ is denoted by $n(k,d)$. It is known that $n(k,d)=Θ(d^k)$, for fixed $1\leqslant k\leqslant d$, but exact formulas are known only in three cases: $k=1$, $k=d-1$, and $k=d$. In particular, the formula $n(1,d)=d+1$ is equivalent to the famous theorem of Graham and Pollak on bipartite partitions of cliques. In this paper we are dealing with the case $k=2$. We give a new construction of $k$-neighborly \emph{codes} giving better lower bounds on $n(2,d)$. The construction is recursive in nature and uses a kind of ``algebra'' on \emph{lists} of ternary strings, which encode neighborly boxes in a familiar way. Moreover, we conjecture that our construction is optimal and gives an explicit formula for $n(2,d)$. This supposition is supported by some numerical experiments and some partial results on related open problems which are recalled.

A family of axis-aligned boxes in $\er^d$ is \emph{$k$-neighborly} if the intersection of every two of them has dimension at least $d-k$ and at most $d-1$. Let $n(k,d)$ denote the maximum size of such a family. It is known that $n(k,d)$ can be equivalently defined as the maximum number of vertices in a complete graph whose edges can be covered by $d$ complete bipartite graphs, with each edge covered at most $k$ times. We derive a new upper bound on $n(k,d)$, which implies, in particular, that $n(k,d)\leqslant (2-δ)^d$ if $k\leqslant (1-\varepsilon)d$, where $δ>0$ depends on arbitrarily chosen $\varepsilon>0$. The proof applies a classical result of Kleitman, concerning the maximum size of sets with a given diameter in discrete hypercubes. By an explicit construction we obtain also a new lower bound for $n(k,d)$, which implies that $n(k,d)\geqslant (1-o(1))\frac{d^k}{k!}$. We also study $k$-neighborly families of boxes with additional structural properties. Families called \emph{total laminations}, that split in a tree-like fashion, turn out to be particularly useful for explicit constructions. We pose a few conjectures based on these constructions and some computational experiments.

We prove a combinatorial theorem on families of disjoint sub-boxes of a discrete cube, which implies that there are at most $2^{d+1}-2$ nearly neighbourly simplices in $\mathbb R^d$.

A combinatorial theorem on families of disjoint sub-boxes of a discrete cube, which implies that there at most $2^{d+1}-2$ neighbourly simplices in $\mathbb R^d$, is presented.

Keller packings and tilings of boxes are investigated. Certain general inequality measuring a complexity of such systems is proved. A straightforward application to the unit cube tilings is given.

It is demonstrated that each nearly neighbourly family of standard boxes in $\mathbb{R}^3$ has at most 12 elements. A combinatorial classification of all such families that have exactly 12 elements is given. All families satisfying an extra property called incompressibility are described. Compressible families are discussed briefly.

We apply combinatorial methods to a geometric problem: the classification of polytopes, in terms of Minkowski decomposability. Various properties of skeletons of polytopes are exhibited, each sufficient to guarantee indecomposability of a significant class of polytopes. We illustrate further the power of these techniques, compared with the traditional method of examining triangular faces, with several applications. In any dimension $d\neq 2$, we show that of all the polytopes with $d^2+\frac{d}{2}$ or fewer edges, only one is decomposable. In 3 dimensions, we complete the classification, in terms of decomposability, of the 260 combinatorial types of polyhedra with 15 or fewer edges.

It is shown that if n<7, then each tiling of R^n by translates of the unit cube [0,1)^n contains a column; that is, a family of the form {[0,1)^n+(s+ke_i): k \in Z}, where s \in R^n, e_i is an element of the standard basis of R^n and Z is the set of integers.

Let k_1,...,k_d be positive integers, and D be a subset of [k_1]x...x[k_d], whose complement can be decomposed into disjoint sets of the form {x_1}x...x{x_{s-1}}x[k_s]x{x_{s+1}}x...x{x_d}. We conjecture that the number of elements of D can be represented as a linear combination of the numbers k_1,..., k_d with non-negative integer coefficients. A connexion of this conjecture with the structure of periodical cube tilings is revealed.

Each packing of R^d by translates of the unit cube [0,1)^d admits a decomposition into at most two parts such that if a translate of the unit cube is covered by one of them, then it also belongs to such a part.

A non-empty subset A of X = X_1 x...x X_d is a (proper) box if A = A_1 x...x A_d and A_i is a (proper) subset of X_i for each i. Suppose that for each pair of boxes A, B and each i, one can only know which of the three states takes place: A_i = B_i, A_i = X_i\setminus B_i, A_i is different from each of the sets B_i, X_i\setminus B_i. Let F and G be two systems of disjoint boxes. Can one decide whether their unions are equal? In general, the answer is no, but as is shown in the paper, it is yes if both systems consist of pairwise dichotomous boxes. Several criteria that enable to compare such systems are collected. The paper includes also rigidity results, which say what assumptions have to be imposed on F to ensure that \bigcup F = \bigcup G implies F = G. As an application, the rigidity conjecture for 2-extremal cube tilings of Lagarias and Shor is verified.