arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by David Yost

12 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
A refined lower bound theorem for $d$-polytopes with at most $2d$ vertices
In 1967, Grünbaum conjectured that the function $$ φ_k(d+s,d):=\binom{d+1}{k+1}+\binom{d}{k+1}-\binom{d+1-s}{k+1},\; \text{for $2\le s\le d$} $$ provides the minimum number of $k$-faces for a $d$-dimensional polytope (abbreviated as a $d$-polytope) with $d+s$ vertices. In 2021, Xue proved this conjecture for each $k\in[1\ldots d-2]$ and characterised the unique minimisers, each having $d+2$ facets. In this paper, we refine Xue's theorem by considering $d$-polytopes with $d+s$ vertices ($2\le s\le d$) and at least $d+3$ facets. If $s=2$, then there is precisely one minimiser for many values of $k$. For other values of $s$, the number of $k$-faces is at least $φ_k(d+s,d)+\binom{d-1}{k}-\binom{d+1-s}{k}$, which is met by precisely two polytopes in many cases, and up to five polytopes for certain values of $s$ and $k$. We also characterise the minimising polytopes.
A lower bound theorem for $d$-polytopes with $2d+2$ vertices
We establish a lower bound theorem for the number of $k$-faces ($1\le k\le d-2$) in a $d$-dimensional polytope $P$ (abbreviated as a $d$-polytope) with $2d+2$ vertices, extending the previously known case for $k=1$. We identify all minimisers for $d\le 5$. Two distinct lower bounds emerge, depending on the number of facets of $P$. When $P$ has precisely $d+2$ facets, the lower bound is tight when $d$ is odd. If $P$ has at least $d+3$ facets, the lower bound is always tight, and equality holds for some $1\le k\le d-2$ only when $P$ has precisely $d+3$ facets. Moreover, for $1\le k\le \ceil{d/3}-2$, the minimisers among $d$-polytopes with $2d+2$ vertices have precisely $d+3$ facets, while for $\floor{0.4d}\le k\le d-1$, the lower bound arises from $d$-polytopes with $d+2$ facets.
Polytopes with low excess degree
We study the existence and structure of $d$-polytopes for which the number $f_1$ of edges is small compared to the number $f_0$ of vertices. Our results are more elegantly expressed in terms of the excess degree of the polytope, defined as $2f_1-df_0$. We show that the excess degree of a $d$-polytope cannot lie in the range $[d+3,2d-7]$, complementing the known result that values in the range $[1,d-3]$ are impossible. In particular, many pairs $(f_0,f_1)$ are not realised by any polytope. For $d$-polytopes with excess degree $d-2$, strong structural results are known; we establish comparable results for excess degrees $d$, $d+2$, and $2d-6$. Frequently, in polytopes with low excess degree, say at most $2d-6$, the nonsimple vertices all have the same degree and they form either a face or a missing face. We show that excess degree $d+1$ is possible only for $d=3,5$, or $7$, complementing the known result that an excess degree $d-1$ is possible only for $d=3$ or $5$.
2021-02-25 v2
A lower bound theorem for $d$-polytopes with $2d+1$ vertices
Published • View PublicationBIB
The problem of calculating exact lower bounds for the number of $k$-faces of $d$-polytopes with $n$ vertices, for each value of $k$, and characterising the minimisers, has recently been solved for $n\le2d$. We establish the corresponding result for $n=2d+1$; the nature of the lower bounds and the minimising polytopes are quite different in this case. As a byproduct, we also characterise all $d$-polytopes with $d+3$ vertices, and only one or two edges more than the minimum.
2021-02-22 v4
Lower bound results for conditionally decomposable polytopes
Published • View PublicationBIB
It is possible for a combinatorial type of polytope to have both decomposable and indecomposable realizations; here decomposability is meant with respect to Minkowski addition. Such polytopes are called conditionally decomposable. We show that the minimum number of vertices of a conditionally decomposable $d$-polytope is in the range $[3d-3, 4d-4]$, and that for a polytope having a line segment for a summand, $4d-4$ is sharp. As an application, the exact lower bound of the number of $k$-faces of a decomposable $d$-polytope with $2d+m$ vertices ($2 \le m\le d-4$) is obtained. Concerning the facets, in dimension 4, the minimum number of facets of a conditionally decomposable polytope is 9, and in dimension $d\ge 5$, the minimum is $d+4$.
Minimum number of edges of polytopes with 2d + 2 vertices
Published • View PublicationBIB
We define an analogue of the cube and an analogue of the 5-wedge in higher dimensions, each with $2d+2$ vertices and $d^2+2d-3$ edges. We show that these two are the only minimisers of the number of edges, amongst d-polytopes with $2d+2$ vertices, for all $d$ except 4, 5 and 7. We also show that there are four sporadic minimisers in these low dimensions. We announce a partial solution to the corresponding problem for polytopes with $2d + 3$ vertices.
Polytopes close to being simple
Published • View PublicationBIB
It is known that polytopes with at most two nonsimple vertices are reconstructible from their graphs, and that $d$-polytopes with at most $d-2$ nonsimple vertices are reconstructible from their 2-skeletons. Here we close the gap between 2 and $d-2$, showing that certain polytopes with more than two nonsimple vertices are reconstructible from their graphs. In particular, we prove that reconstructibility from graphs also holds for $d$-polytopes with $d+k$ vertices and at most $d-k+3$ nonsimple vertices, provided $k\ge 5$. For $k\le4$, the same conclusion holds under a slightly stronger assumption. Another measure of deviation from simplicity is the {\it excess degree} of a polytope, defined as $ξ(P):=2f_1-df_0$, where $f_k$ denotes the number of $k$-dimensional faces of the polytope. Simple polytopes are those with excess zero. We prove that polytopes with excess at most $d-1$ are reconstructible from their graphs, and this is best possible. An interesting intermediate result is that $d$-polytopes with less than $2d$ vertices, and at most $d-1$ nonsimple vertices, are necessarily pyramids.
The excess degree of a polytope
Published • View PublicationBIB
We define the excess degree $ξ(P)$ of a $d$-polytope $P$ as $2f_1-df_0$, where $f_0$ and $f_1$ denote the number of vertices and edges, respectively. This parameter measures how much $P$ deviates from being simple. It turns out that the excess degree of a $d$-polytope does not take every natural number: the smallest possible values are $0$ and $d-2$, and the value $d-1$ only occurs when $d=3$ or 5. On the other hand, for fixed $d$, the number of values not taken by the excess degree is finite if $d$ is odd, and the number of even values not taken by the excess degree is finite if $d$ is even. The excess degree is then applied in three different settings. It is used to show that polytopes with small excess (i.e. $ξ(P)<d$) have a very particular structure: provided $d\ne5$, either there is a unique nonsimple vertex, or every nonsimple vertex has degree $d+1$. This implies that such polytopes behave in a similar manner to simple polytopes in terms of Minkowski decomposability: they are either decomposable or pyramidal, and their duals are always indecomposable. Secondly, we characterise completely the decomposable $d$-polytopes with $2d+1$ vertices (up to combinatorial equivalence). And thirdly all pairs $(f_0,f_1)$, for which there exists a 5-polytope with $f_0$ vertices and $f_1$ edges, are determined.
On the reconstruction of polytopes
Published • View PublicationBIB
Blind and Mani, and later Kalai, showed that the face lattice of a simple polytope is determined by its graph, namely its $1$-skeleton. Call a vertex of a $d$-polytope \emph{nonsimple} if the number of edges incident to it is more than $d$. We show that (1) the face lattice of any $d$-polytope with at most two nonsimple vertices is determined by its $1$-skeleton; (2) the face lattice of any $d$-polytope with at most $d-2$ nonsimple vertices is determined by its $2$-skeleton; and (3) for any $d>3$ there are two $d$-polytopes with $d-1$ nonsimple vertices, isomorphic $(d-3)$-skeleta and nonisomorphic face lattices. In particular, the result (1) is best possible for $4$-polytopes.
2016-07-03
More indecomposable polyhedra
We apply combinatorial methods to a geometric problem: the classification of polytopes, in terms of Minkowski decomposability. Various properties of skeletons of polytopes are exhibited, each sufficient to guarantee indecomposability of a significant class of polytopes. We illustrate further the power of these techniques, compared with the traditional method of examining triangular faces, with several applications. In any dimension $d\neq 2$, we show that of all the polytopes with $d^2+\frac{d}{2}$ or fewer edges, only one is decomposable. In 3 dimensions, we complete the classification, in terms of decomposability, of the 260 combinatorial types of polyhedra with 15 or fewer edges.
Almost simplicial polytopes I. The lower and upper bound theorems
Published • View PublicationBIB
We study $n$-vertex $d$-dimensional polytopes with at most one nonsimplex facet with, say, $d+s$ vertices, called {\it almost simplicial polytopes}. We provide tight lower and upper bound theorems for these polytopes as functions of $d,n$ and $s$, thus generalizing the classical Lower Bound Theorem by Barnette and Upper Bound Theorem by McMullen, which treat the case of $s=0$. We characterize the minimizers and provide examples of maximizers, for any $d$. Our construction of maximizers is a generalization of cyclic polytopes, based on a suitable variation of the moment curve, and is of independent interest.
Lower bound theorems for general polytopes
Published in European Journal of Combinatorics, Volume 79, 2019, Pages 27-45 • View PublicationBIB
For a $d$-dimensional polytope with $v$ vertices, $d+1\le v\le2d$, we calculate precisely the minimum possible number of $m$-dimensional faces, when $m=1$ or $m\ge0.62d$. This confirms a conjecture of Grünbaum, for these values of $m$. For $v=2d+1$, we solve the same problem when $m=1$ or $d-2$; the solution was already known for $m= d-1$. In all these cases, we give a characterisation of the minimising polytopes. We also show that there are many gaps in the possible number of $m$-faces: for example, there is no polytope with 80 edges in dimension 10, and a polytope with 407 edges can have dimension at most 23.