arXiv++ Combinatorics

For a given $d$-regular graph $G$, a Maker-Breaker degree game is played by two players who alternately claim previously unclaimed edges of $G$. In the standard variant, the goal of Maker is to maximize the maximum degree of their induced subgraph, while Breaker aims to minimize it, or equivalently, to guarantee a certain minimum degree in their own subgraph. A classic pairing strategy shows that Breaker can secure at least $\lfloor d/4 \rfloor$ edges at every vertex of any $d$-regular graph. Breaking this bound for general or even for specific classes of graphs has been a long-standing open problem in combinatorial game theory; indeed, J. Beck characterized this challenge in his monograph as the first among the seven most humiliating open problems of positional game theory. In this paper, we improve the $d/4$ bound for some infinite graph families, such as the hypercube graph $Q_d$, grids and tori. We first show that Breaker can secure a degree of one at every vertex in $Q_3$, then lift this to higher dimensions, where Breaker can guarantee a degree of at least $\lfloor d/3 \rfloor$.

In the unbiased Chooser-Picker (also known as Client-Waiter) game played on the edge set of a graph, Picker offers a pair of unclaimed edges in each turn, Chooser claims one, and the remaining edge goes back to Picker. We study the Chooser-Picker (C-P) degree game played on $d$-regular graphs, where Chooser aims to maximize the maximum degree of their induced subgraph, and Picker's objective is to defend every vertex by securing a certain minimum degree in Picker's own subgraph. While classical static pairing strategies guarantee a minimum degree of at least $\lfloor d/4 \rfloor$ for Breaker on general $d$-regular graphs in Maker-Breaker (M-B) games and for Picker in C-P games, outperforming this threshold has been a major open challenge in both frameworks. According to the foundational monograph of J. Beck, this challenge stands as the first among the seven most humiliating problems in combinatorial game theory. Our main result is that Picker can beat the $d/4$ bound. First, we prove that Picker can always guarantee a degree of at least one at every vertex on any $3$-regular graph. Based upon this we introduce a direct strategy to prove that Picker can secure a degree of at least $\lfloor d/3 \rfloor$ at every vertex for any $d$-regular graph. This highlights a fundamental structural advantage that Picker usually possesses over Breaker in sparse local games.

We study the problem of partitioning the edge set of the complete graph into bipartite subgraphs under certain constraints defined by forbidden subgraphs. These constraints lead to both classical problems, such as partitioning into independent matchings or complete bipartite subgraphs, and novel variants motivated by structural restrictions. Our theoretical framework is inspired by clustering problems in real-world transaction graphs, which can be formulated naturally as edge partitioning problems under bipartite graph constraints. The main result of this paper is the proof of the bounds for $χ'_{2K_2}(n)$, which corresponds to the minimum number of induced $2K_2$-free bipartite subgraphs needed to partition the edges of $K_n$. In addition to this central result, we also present several similar bounds for other forbidden subgraphs on three or four vertices. Some are included primarily for the sake of completeness, to demonstrate the broad applicability of our approach, and some lead to other novel or well-known graph theoretical problems.