arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study the optimal order (or sequence) of contracting a tensor network with a minimal computational cost. We conclude 2 different versions of this optimal sequence: that minimize the operation number (OMS) and that minimize the time complexity (CMS). Existing results only shows that OMS is NP-hard, but no conclusion on CMS problem. In this work, we firstly reduce CMS to CMS-0, which is a sub-problem of CMS with no free indices. Then we prove that CMS is easier than OMS, both in general and in tree cases. Last but not least, we prove that CMS is still NP-hard. Based on our results, we have built up relationships of hardness of different tensor network contraction problems.

Denote $\mathcal{A}$ as the set of all doubly substochastic $m \times n$ matrices and let $k$ be a positive integer. Let $\mathcal{A}_k$ be the set of all $1/k$-bounded doubly substochastic $m \times n$ matrices, i.e., $\mathcal{A}_k \triangleq \{E \in \mathcal{A}: e_{i,j} \in [0, 1/k], \forall i=1,2,\cdots,m, j = 1,2,\cdots, n\}$. Denote $\mathcal{B}_k$ as the set of all matrices in $\mathcal{A}_k$ whose entries are either $0$ or $1/k$. We prove that $\mathcal{A}_k$ is the convex hull of all matrices in $\mathcal{B}_k$.