arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Linda Morales

3 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
Improved Lower Bounds for Permutation Arrays Using Permutation Rational Functions
Published • View PublicationBIB
We consider rational functions of the form $V(x)/U(x)$, where both $V(x)$ and $U(x)$ are polynomials over the finite field $\mathbb{F}_q$. Polynomials that permute the elements of a field, called {\it permutation polynomials ($PPs$)}, have been the subject of research for decades. Let ${\mathcal P}^1(\mathbb{F}_q)$ denote $\mathbb{Z}_q \cup \{\infty\}$. If the rational function, $V(x)/U(x)$, permutes the elements of ${\mathcal P}^1(\mathbb{F}_q)$, it is called a {\em permutation rational function (PRf)}. Let $N_d(q)$ denote the number of PPs of degree $d$ over $\mathbb{F}_q$, and let $N_{v,u}(q)$ denote the number of PRfs with a numerator of degree $v$ and a denominator of degree $u$. It follows that $N_{d,0}(q) = N_d(q)$, so PRFs are a generalization of PPs. The number of monic degree 3 PRfs is known [11]. We develop efficient computational techniques for $N_{v,u}(q)$, and use them to show $N_{4,3}(q) = (q+1)q^2(q-1)^2/3$, for all prime powers $q \le 307$, $N_{5,4}(q) > (q+1)q^3(q-1)^2/2$, for all prime powers $q \le 97$, and $N_{4,4}(p) = (p+1)p^2(p-1)^3/3$, for all primes $p \le 47$. We conjecture that these formulas are, in fact, true for all prime powers $q$. Let $M(n,D)$ denote the maximum number of permutations on $n$ symbols with pairwise Hamming distance $D$. Computing improved lower bounds for $M(n,D)$ is the subject of much current research with applications in error correcting codes. Using PRfs, we obtain significantly improved lower bounds on $M(q,q-d)$ and $M(q+1,q-d)$, for $d \in \{5,7,9\}$.
Equivalence Relations for Computing Permutation Polynomials
We present a new technique for computing permutation polynomials based on equivalence relations. The equivalence relations are defined by expanded normalization operations and new functions that map permutation polynomials (PPs) to other PPs. Our expanded normalization applies to almost all PPs, including when the characteristic of the finite field divides the degree of the polynomial. The equivalence relations make it possible to reduce the size of the space, when doing an exhaustive search. As a result, we have been able to compute almost all permutation polynomials of degree $d$ at most 10 over $GF(q)$, where $q$ is at most 97. We have also been able to compute nPPs of degrees 11 and 12 in a few cases. The techniques apply to arbitrary $q$ and $d$. In addition, the equivalence relations allow the set all PPs for a given degree and a given field $GF(q)$ to be succinctly described by their representative nPPs. We give several tables at the end of the paper listing the representative nPPs (\ie the equivalence classes) for several values of $q$ and $d$. We also give several new lower bounds for $M(n,D)$, the maximum number of permutations on $n$ symbols with pairwise Hamming distance $D$, mostly derived from our results on PPs.
New Lower Bounds for Permutation Arrays Using Contraction
Published • View PublicationBIB
A permutation array $A$ is a set of permutations on a finite set $Ω$, say of size $n$. Given distinct permutations $π, σ\in Ω$, we let $hd(π, σ) = |\{ x\in Ω: π(x) \ne σ(x) \}|$, called the Hamming distance between $π$ and $σ$. Now let $hd(A) =$ min$\{ hd(π, σ): π, σ\in A \}$. For positive integers $n$ and $d$ with $d\le n$, we let $M(n,d)$ be the maximum number of permutations in any array $A$ satisfying $hd(A) \geq d$. There is an extensive literature on the function $M(n,d)$, motivated in part by suggested applications to error correcting codes for message transmission over power lines. A basic fact is that if a permutation group $G$ is sharply $k$-transitive on a set of size $n\geq k$, then $M(n,n-k+1) = |G|$. Motivated by this we consider the permutation groups $AGL(1,q)$ and $PGL(2,q)$ acting sharply $2$-transitively on $GF(q)$ and sharply $3$-transitively on $GF(q)\cup \{\infty\}$ respectively. Applying a contraction operation to these groups, we obtain the following new lower bounds for prime powers $q$ satisfying $q\equiv 1$ (mod $3$). 1. $M(q-1,q-3)\geq (q^{2} - 1)/2$ for $q$ odd, $q\geq 7$, 2. $M(q-1,q-3)\geq (q-1)(q+2)/3$ for $q$ even, $q\geq 8$, 3. $M(q,q-3)\geq Kq^{2}\log q$ for some constant $K$ if $q$ is odd, $q\geq 13$. These results resolve a case left open in a previous paper \cite{BLS}, where it was shown that $M(q-1, q-3) \geq q^{2} - q$ and $M(q,q-3) \geq q^{3} - q$ for all prime powers $q$ such that $q\not \equiv 1$ (mod $3$). We also obtain lower bounds for $M(n,d)$ for a finite number of exceptional pairs $n,d$, by applying this contraction operation to the sharply $4$ and $5$-transitive Mathieu groups.