arXiv++ Combinatorics

Modularity is designed to measure the strength of division of a network into clusters (known also as communities). Networks with high modularity have dense connections between the vertices within clusters but sparse connections between vertices of different clusters. As a result, modularity is often used in optimization methods for detecting community structure in networks, and so it is an important graph parameter from a practical point of view. Unfortunately, many existing non-spatial models of complex networks do not generate graphs with high modularity; on the other hand, spatial models naturally create clusters. We investigate this phenomenon by considering a few examples from both sub-classes. We prove precise theoretical results for the classical model of random d-regular graphs as well as the preferential attachment model, and contrast these results with the ones for the spatial preferential attachment (SPA) model that is a model for complex networks in which vertices are embedded in a metric space, and each vertex has a sphere of influence whose size increases if the vertex gains an in-link, and otherwise decreases with time. The results obtained in this paper can be used for developing statistical tests for models selection and to measure statistical significance of clusters observed in complex networks.

In this paper, we present a detailed analysis of the global clustering coefficient in scale-free graphs. Many observed real-world networks of diverse nature have a power-law degree distribution. Moreover, the observed degree distribution usually has an infinite variance. Therefore, we are especially interested in such degree distributions. In addition, we analyze the clustering coefficient for both weighted and unweighted graphs. There are two well-known definitions of the clustering coefficient of a graph: the global and the average local clustering coefficients. There are several models proposed in the literature for which the average local clustering coefficient tends to a positive constant as a graph grows. On the other hand, there are no models of scale-free networks with an infinite variance of the degree distribution and with an asymptotically constant global clustering coefficient. Models with constant global clustering and finite variance were also proposed. Therefore, in this paper we focus only on the most interesting case: we analyze the global clustering coefficient for graphs with an infinite variance of the degree distribution. For unweighted graphs, we prove that the global clustering coefficient tends to zero with high probability and we also estimate the largest possible clustering coefficient for such graphs. On the contrary, for weighted graphs, the constant global clustering coefficient can be obtained even for the case of an infinite variance of the degree distribution.

In this paper, we analyze the behavior of the global clustering coefficient in scale free graphs. We are especially interested in the case of degree distribution with an infinite variance, since such degree distribution is usually observed in real-world networks of diverse nature. There are two common definitions of the clustering coefficient of a graph: global clustering and average local clustering. It is widely believed that in real networks both clustering coefficients tend to some positive constant as the networks grow. There are several models for which the average local clustering coefficient tends to a positive constant. On the other hand, there are no models of scale-free networks with an infinite variance of degree distribution and with a constant global clustering. In this paper we prove that if the degree distribution obeys the power law with an infinite variance, then the global clustering coefficient tends to zero with high probability as the size of a graph grows.

Preferential attachment models were shown to be very effective in predicting such important properties of real-world networks as the power-law degree distribution, small diameter, etc. Many different models are based on the idea of preferential attachment: LCD, Buckley-Osthus, Holme-Kim, fitness, random Apollonian network, and many others. Although preferential attachment models reflect some important properties of real-world networks, they do not allow to model the so-called recency property. Recency property reflects the fact that in many real networks vertices tend to connect to other vertices of similar age. This fact motivated us to introduce a new class of models - recency-based models. This class is a generalization of fitness models, which were suggested by Bianconi and Barabasi. Bianconi and Barabasi extended preferential attachment models with pages' inherent quality or fitness of vertices. When a new vertex is added to the graph, it is joined to some already existing vertices that are chosen with probabilities proportional to the product of their fitness and incoming degree. We generalize fitness models by adding a recency factor to the attractiveness function. This means that pages are gaining incoming links according to their attractiveness, which is determined by the incoming degree of the page (current popularity), its inherent quality (some page-specific constant) and age (new pages are gaining new links more rapidly). We analyze different properties of recency-based models. In particular, we show that some distributions of inherent quality lead to the power-law degree distribution.