arXiv++ Combinatorics

For a graph $Γ=(V,E)$ and nonnegative integers $a$ and $b$, a nonempty proper subset $C \subset V$ is called an $(a,b)$-regular set if every vertex in $C$ has exactly $a$ neighbors in $C$, and every vertex in $V\setminus C$ has exactly $b$ neighbors in $C$. In this paper, we study the existence of such sets in connected Cayley graph $Γ= \operatorname{Cay}(\mathbb{Z}_n, S)$. We establish a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of $(0, |S|)$-regular sets and identify additional conditions under which no such set can exist. We further prove that $(|S|, 0)$-regular sets do not occur in $Γ$, and more generally, that no connected Cayley graph $\operatorname{Cay}(G,S)$ contains a $(1, |S|)$-regular set. As a main result, we determine the existence and nonexistence of $(a,b)$-regular sets in connected circulant quartic graphs for all possible values of $a$ and $b$.

The sequence reconstruction problem asks for the recovery of a sequence from multiple noisy copies, where each copy may contain up to $r$ errors. In the case of permutations on \(n\) letters under the Hamming metric, this problem is closely related to the parameter $N(n,r)$, the maximum intersection size of two Hamming balls of radius $r$. While previous work has resolved \(N(n,r)\) for small radii (\(r \leq 4\)) and established asymptotic bounds for larger \(r\), we present new exact formulas for \(r \in \{5,6,7\}\) using group action techniques. In addition, we develop a formula for \(N(n,r)\) based on the irreducible characters of the symmetric group \(S_n\), along with an algorithm that enables computation of \(N(n,r)\) for larger parameters, including cases such as \(N(43,8)\) and \(N(24,14)\).

We study $P(n,3)$, the size of the largest subset of the set of all permutations $S_n$ with minimum Kendall $τ$-distance $3$. Using a combination of group theory and integer programming, we reduced the upper bound of $P(p,3)$ from $(p-1)!-1$ to $(p-1)!-\lceil\frac{p}{3}\rceil+2\leq (p-1)!-2$ for all primes $p\geq 11$. In special cases where $n$ is equal to $6,7,11,13,14,15$ and $17$ we reduced the upper bound of $P(n,3)$ by $3,3,9,11,1,1$ and $4$, respectively.