arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study maximum matching problems in temporal graphs whose underlying graph is a tree. We consider two temporal models. In a $Δ$-matching, selected time edges sharing an endpoint must have time ticks differing by at least $Δ$. In a $γ$-matching, the selected objects are blocks of $γ$ consecutive appearances of the same underlying edge. We also consider the related ordered static problem of $d$-distance matchings. We show that maximum $Δ$-matching remains NP-hard on temporal trees for every $Δ\geq 2$, even in the sparse case where each edge appears at most twice. Using a reduction between the temporal models, we obtain the analogous result for maximum $γ$-matching on temporal trees, even when each edge admits at most two $γ$-edges. We also show, via a reduction from $d$-distance matching, that maximum $γ$-matching is APX-hard even when the underlying graph is bipartite. Complementing these hardness results, we identify several tractable cases. We prove that maximum $Δ$-matching is polynomial-time solvable on temporal trees in which every edge appears exactly once, and that maximum $γ$-matching is polynomial-time solvable when each edge admits at most one $γ$-edge. We also give dynamic-programming algorithms under bounded local-use and local-sparsity assumptions, and derive polynomial-time solvability of maximum $d$-distance matching when the input bipartite graph is a tree. Finally, we prove that both maximum $Δ$-matching and maximum $γ$-matching admit polynomial-time approximation schemes on temporal trees.

Let $F_{k,d}(n)$ be the maximal size of a set ${A}\subseteq [n]$ such that the equation \[a_1a_2\dots a_k=x^d, \; a_1<a_2<\ldots<a_k\] has no solution with $a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_k\in {A}$ and integer $x$. Erdős, Sárközy and T. Sós studied $F_{k,2}$, and gave bounds when $k=2,3,4,6$ and also in the general case. We study the problem for $d=3$, and provide bounds for $k=2,3,4,6$ and $9$, furthermore, in the general case, as well. In particular, we refute an 18 years old conjecture of Verstraëte. We also introduce another function $f_{k,d}$ closely related to $F_{k,d}$: While the original problem requires $a_1, \ldots , a_k$ to all be distinct, we can relax this and only require that the multiset of the $a_i$'s cannot be partitioned into $d$-tuples where each $d$-tuple consists of $d$ copies of the same number.