arXiv++ Combinatorics

A graph property is elusive (or evasive) if any algorithm testing it by asking questions of the form ''Is there an edge between vertices x and y?'' must, in the worst case, examine all pairs of vertices. Elusiveness for infinite vertex sets has been first studied by Csernák and Soukup, who proved that the long-standing Aanderaa-Karp-Rosenberg Conjecture -- which states that every nontrivial monotone graph property is elusive -- fails for infinite vertex sets. We extend their work by giving a closer look to the case when the vertex set is countably infinite and the ''algorithm'' terminates after infinitely many steps. Among others, we prove that connectedness is elusive, which strengthens a result of Csernák and Soukup. We give counterexamples to the infinite version of the Aanderaa-Karp-Rosenberg Conjecture even if the ''algorithm'' is required to terminate after infinitely many steps, which strengthens results of Csernák and Soukup.

Let $X$ be a set, $\ka$ be a cardinal number and let $\iH$ be a family of subsets of $X$ which covers each $x\in X$ at least $\ka$ times. What assumptions can ensure that $\iH$ can be decomposed into $κ$ many disjoint subcovers? We examine this problem under various assumptions on the set $X$ and on the cover $\iH$: among other situations, we consider covers of topological spaces by closed sets, interval covers of linearly ordered sets and covers of $\real^{n}$ by polyhedra and by arbitrary convex sets. We focus on these problems mainly for infinite $κ$. Besides numerous positive and negative results, many questions turn out to be independent of the usual axioms of set theory.