arXiv++ Combinatorics

Suppose that pebbles are distributed on the vertices of a directed graph D. A directed pebbling step u -> v along an arc u -> v removes two pebbles from u and places one pebble on v. We study the stacking number stack(D), the least integer t >= 2 such that every configuration with t pebbles can be transformed by a finite sequence of pebbling steps into a configuration with all pebbles on a single vertex, and the clearing number clear(D), defined analogously by requiring a final configuration with one pebble. Our main result is the formula stack(C_n) = n(2^{n-1}-1)+1 for the directed n-cycle C_n, for n >= 2. We also prove that, for finite simple digraphs with at least two vertices, stack(D) is defined precisely for strongly connected digraphs, and clear(D) is defined precisely for strongly connected digraphs whose directed cycle lengths have greatest common divisor 1.

Suppose that pebbles are distributed on the vertices of a graph G. A pebbling step along an edge uv removes two pebbles from u and places one pebble on v. We introduce two new graph parameters: stack(G): the least integer t such that every configuration with t pebbles can be transformed, by a finite sequence of pebbling steps, into a configuration with all pebbles on a single vertex. clear(G): defined analogously, but requiring that from every configuration with t pebbles, all but one pebble can be removed. We prove that stack(G) is defined exactly for connected graphs, and that clear(G) is defined exactly for connected non-bipartite graphs. We also establish general upper bounds for these parameters; in particular, stack(G), clear(G) <= 2 |V(G)| 2^diam(G), where diam(G) denotes the diameter of G. Among our exact results are the equalities stack(K_n) = clear(K_n) = n + 1, stack(K_{m,n}) = 3 max{m,n} + 1, stack(P_n) = 2^n - 1. We also establish general lower bounds in terms of the independence number and odd closed walks. For cycles, the situation is more delicate. We prove the lower bounds stack(C_{2n}) >= 2^{n+1} - 1, clear(C_{2n+1}) >= 3 * 2^n - 2, and formulate the Almost Stacked Hypothesis, motivated by Sjostrand's cover pebbling theorem. Assuming this hypothesis, we obtain stack(C_{2n}) = 2^{n+1} - 1, clear(C_{2n+1}) = 3 * 2^n - 2. At present, we do not have a conjecture for the exact value of stack(C_{2n+1}). Finally, computational evidence leads us to a conjectural closed formula for the stacking number of a tree in terms of the distances and degrees of the vertices relative to a chosen root.

Let $n>c_1\ge c_2$ and $Σ$ be positive integers with $n\cdot c_1\ge Σ\ge n\cdot c_2.$ Let $\mD=\dds{n}Σ{c_1}{c_2}$ denote the set of all degree sequences of length $n$ with the even sum $Σ$ and satisfying $c_1\ge d_i\ge c_2.$ We show that if all degree sequences in $\mD$ are graphic, then $\mD$ is $3n^{13}$-stable. (The concept of $P$-stability was introduced by Jerrum and Sinclair in 1990.) In particular, this implies that the switch Markov-chain mixes rapidly on all such degree sequences. In this paper we also study the inverse direction. We show the following: if all graphic sequences of a degree sequence region satisfy the $p(n)$-stability condition then the overwhelming majority of the sequences in the region is graphic. This answers affirmatively a question raised in the paper \DOI{10.1016/j.aam.2024.102805}.

The notion of $P$-stability of an infinite set of degree sequences plays influential role in approximating the permanents, rapidly sampling the realizations of graphic degree sequences, or even studying and improving network privacy. While there exist several known sufficient conditions for $P$-stability, we don't know any useful necessary condition for it. We also do not have good insight of possible structure of $P$-stable degree sequence families. At first we will show that every known infinite $P$-stable degree sequence set, described by inequalities of the parameters $n, c_1, c_2, Σ$ (the sequence length, the maximum and minimum degrees and the sum of the degrees) is ,,fully graphic" meaning that every degree sequence from the region with an even degree sum, is graphic. Furthermore, if $Σ$ does not occur in the determining inequality, then the notions of $P$-stability and full graphicality will be proved equivalent. In turns, this equality provides a strengthening of the well-known theorem of Jerrum, McKay and Sinclair about $P$-stability, describing the maximal $P$-stable sequence set by $n, c_1, c_2$. Furthermore we conjecture that similar equivalences occur in cases if $Σ$ also part of the defining inequality.

A graph property is said to be elusive ( evasive) if every algorithm testing this property by asking questions of the form "is there an edge between vertices x and y" requires, in the worst case, to ask about all pairs of vertices. The unsettled Aanderaa-Karp-Rosenberg conjecture is that every monotone graph property is elusive for finite vertex sets. We show that the situation is completely different for infinite vertex sets: the monotone graph properties "every vertex has degree at least n" and "every connected components has size at least n" where n is a natural number, are not elusive for infinite vertex sets, but the monotone graph property "the graph contains a cycle" is elusive for arbitrary vertex sets. On the other hand, we also prove that every algorithm testing some natural monotone graph properties, e.g "every vertex has degree at least n" or "connected" on the vertex set omega should check "lots of edges", more precisely, all the edges of an infinite complete subgraph.

In this paper a hypergraph will be identified with the family of its edges. A hypergraph $\mathcal E$ possesses property $C(k,ρ)$ iff $|\bigcap \mathcal E'|<ρ$ for each $\mathcal E'\in {[\mathcal E]}^{k}$. A vertex set $Y\subset \bigcup\mathcal E$ is a "vertex cover" of $\mathcal E$ iff $E\cap Y\ne \emptyset$ for each $E\in \mathcal E$. A vertex cover $Y$ is "minimal" iff no proper subset of $Y$ is vertex cover. If $A$ is a set and $S$ is a set of cardinals, write $$ {[A]}^{S}=\{B\subset A: |B|\in S\}. $$ If $λ$ and $ρ$ are cardinals, $S$ is a set of cardinals, $k\in ω$, then we write $$\mathbf M({λ},{S},{k},{μ})\to \mathbf{MinVC} $$ iff every hypergraph $\mathcal E\subset {[λ]}^{S}$ possessing property $C({k},{ρ})$ has a minimal vertex cover. If $S=\{κ\}$, then we simply write $\mathbf M({λ},κ,{k},{μ})\to \mathbf{MinVC}$ for $\mathbf M({λ},\{κ\},{k},{μ})\to \mathbf{MinVC}$ A set $S$ of cardinals is "nowhere stationary" iff $S\cap α$ is not stationary in $α$ for any ordinal $α$ with $cf(α)>ω$. Countable sets of cardinals, and sets of successor cardinals are nowhere stationary. In this paper we prove: (1) $\mathbf M({λ},{S},{2},{k})\to \mathbf{MinVC}$ for each nowhere stationary set $S$ of cardinals and $ω\le λ$, (2) $\mathbf M({λ},{κ} ,{2},{ρ})\to \mathbf{MinVC}$ provided $ρ<\beth_ω\le κ\le λ$, (3) $\mathbf M({λ},{ω},{r},{k})\to \mathbf{MinVC}$ provided $ω\le λ$ and $k,r\in ω$, (4) $\mathbf M({λ},{ω_1},{3},{k})\to \mathbf{MinVC}$ provided $ω_1\le λ$ and $k\in ω$.

Since 1997 a considerable effort has been spent to study the mixing time of switch Markov chains on the realizations of graphic degree sequences of simple graphs. Several results were proved on rapidly mixing Markov chains on unconstrained, bipartite, and directed sequences, using different mechanisms. The aim of this paper is to unify these approaches. We will illustrate the strength of the unified method by showing that on any $P$-stable family of unconstrained/bipartite/directed degree sequences the switch Markov chain is rapidly mixing. This is a common generalization of every known result that shows the rapid mixing nature of the switch Markov chain on a region of degree sequences. Two applications of this general result will be presented. One is an almost uniform sampler for power-law degree sequences with exponent $γ>1+\sqrt{3}$. The other one shows that the switch Markov chain on the degree sequence of an Erdős-Rényi random graph $G(n,p)$ is asymptotically almost surely rapidly mixing if $p$ is bounded away from 0 and 1 by at least $\frac{5\log n}{n-1}$.

We explore a general method based on trees of elementary submodels in order to present highly simplified proofs to numerous results in infinite combinatorics. While countable elementary submodels have been employed in such settings already, we significantly broaden this framework by developing the corresponding technique for countably closed models of size continuum. The applications range from various theorems on paradoxical decompositions of the plane, to coloring sparse set systems, results on graph chromatic number and constructions from point-set topology. Our main purpose is to demonstrate the ease and wide applicability of this method in a form accessible to anyone with a basic background in set theory and logic.

With the current burst of network theory (especially in connection with social and biological networks) there is a renewed interest on realizations of given degree sequences. In this paper we propose an essentially new degree sequence problem: we want to find graphical realizations of a given degree sequence on labeled vertices, where certain would-be edges are {\em forbidden}. Then we want to sample uniformly and efficiently all these possible realizations. (This problem can be considered as a special case of Tutte's $f$-factor problem, however it has a favorable sampling speed.) We solve this {\em restricted degree sequence} (or RDS for short) problem completely if the forbidden edges form a bipartite graph, which consist of the union of a (not necessarily maximal) 1-factor and a (possible empty) star. Then we show how one can sample the space of all realizations of these RDSs uniformly and efficiently when the degree sequence describes a {\em half-regular} bipartite graph. Our result contains, as special cases, the well-known result of Kannan, Tetali and Vempala on sampling regular bipartite graphs and a recent result of Greenhill on sampling regular directed graphs (so it also provides new proofs of them). The RDS problem descried above is self-reducible, therefore our {\em fully polynomial almost uniform sampler} (a.k.a. FPAUS) on the space of all realizations also provides a {\em fully polynomial randomized approximation scheme} (a.k.a. FPRAS) for approximate counting of all realizations.

Using Shelah's revised GCH theorem we prove that if mu<beth_omega <= lambda are cardinals, then every mu-almost disjoint subfamily B of [lambda]^{beth_omega} is essentially disjoint, i.e. for each b from B there is a subset f(b) of b of size < |b| such that the family {b-f(b) b in B} is disjoint. We also show that if mu<=kappa<=lambda, and kappa is infinite, and (x) every mu-almost disjoint subfamily of [lambda]^kappa is essentially disjoint, then (xx) every mu-almost disjoint family B of subsets of lambda with |b|>=kappa for all b from B has a conflict-free colorings with kappa colors. Putting together these results we obtain that if mu<beth_omega<=lambda, then every mu-almost disjoint family B of subsets of lambda with |b|>=beth_omega for all b from B has a conflict-free colorings with beth_omega colors. To yield the above mentioned results we also need to prove a certain compactness theorem concerning singular cardinals.

The usage of elementary submodels is a simple but powerful method to prove theorems, or to simplify proofs in infinite combinatorics. First we introduce all the necessary concepts of logic, then we prove classical theorems using elementary submodels. We also present a new proof of Nash-Williams's theorem on cycle-decomposition of graphs, and finally we improve a decomposition theorem of Laviolette concerning bond-faithful decompositions of graphs.

In this paper we consider a simple Markov chain for bipartite graphs with given degree sequence on $n$ vertices. We show that the mixing time of this Markov chain is bounded above by a polynomial in $n$ in case of {\em semi-regular} degree sequence. The novelty of our approach lays in the construction of the canonical paths in Sinclair's method.

This paper provides a short and transparent solution for the covering cost of white-grey trees which play a crucial role in the algorithm of Bergeron {\it et al.}\ to compute the rearrangement distance between two multichromosomal genomes in linear time ({\it Theor. Comput. Sci.}, 410:5300-5316, 2009). In the process it introduces a new {\em center} notion for trees, which seems to be interesting on its own.

A set-system $X$ is a $(λ, κ,μ)$-system iff $|X|=λ$, $|x|=κ$ for each $x\in X$, and $X$ is $μ$-almost disjoint. We write $[λ, κ, μ] -> ρ$ iff every $(λ, κ,μ)$-system has a "conflict free coloring with $ρ$ colors", i.e. there is a coloring of the elements of $\cup X$ with$ρ$ colors such that for each element $x$ of $X$ there is a color $ξ<ρ$ such that exactly one element of $x$ has color $ξ$. Our main object of study is the relation $[λ, κ, μ] -> ρ$. We give full description of this relation when $κ$ is finite. We also show that if $d$ is a natural number then $[λ,κ,d]-> ω$ always holds. Under GCH we prove that $[λ,κ,ω]-> ω_2$ holds for $κ>ω_1$, but the relation $[λ,κ,ω]-> ω_1$ is independent (modulo some large cardinals).

Let $X$ be a set, $\ka$ be a cardinal number and let $\iH$ be a family of subsets of $X$ which covers each $x\in X$ at least $\ka$ times. What assumptions can ensure that $\iH$ can be decomposed into $κ$ many disjoint subcovers? We examine this problem under various assumptions on the set $X$ and on the cover $\iH$: among other situations, we consider covers of topological spaces by closed sets, interval covers of linearly ordered sets and covers of $\real^{n}$ by polyhedra and by arbitrary convex sets. We focus on these problems mainly for infinite $κ$. Besides numerous positive and negative results, many questions turn out to be independent of the usual axioms of set theory.

We give a negative answer to a question of Erdos and Hajnal: it is consistent that GCH holds and there is a colouring $c:[{ω_2}]^2\to 2$ establishing $ω_2 \not\to [(ω_1;ω)]^2_2$ such that some colouring $g:[ω_1]^2\to 2$ can not be embedded into $c$. It is also consistent that $2^{ω_1}$ is arbitrarily large, and a function $g$ establishes $2^{ω_1} \not\to [(ω_1,ω_2)]^2_{ω_1}$ such that there is no uncountable $g$-rainbow subset of $2^{ω_1}$. We also show that for each $k\in ω$ it is consistent with Martin's Axiom that the negative partition relation $ω_1 \not\to^* [(ω_1;ω_1)]_{k-bdd}$ holds.

Given a directed graph G=(V,E) an independent set A of the vertices V is called quasi-kernel (quasi-sink) iff for each point v there is a path of length at most 2 from some point of A to v (from v to some point of A). Every finite directed graph has a quasi-kernel. The plain generalization for infinite graphs fails, even for tournaments. We investigate the following conjecture here: for any digraph G=(V,E) there is a a partition (V_0,V_1) of the vertex set such that the induced subgraph G[V_0] has a quasi-kernel and the induced subgraph G[V_1] has a quasi-sink.