arXiv++ Combinatorics

Suppose that pebbles are distributed on the vertices of a directed graph D. A directed pebbling step u -> v along an arc u -> v removes two pebbles from u and places one pebble on v. We study the stacking number stack(D), the least integer t >= 2 such that every configuration with t pebbles can be transformed by a finite sequence of pebbling steps into a configuration with all pebbles on a single vertex, and the clearing number clear(D), defined analogously by requiring a final configuration with one pebble. Our main result is the formula stack(C_n) = n(2^{n-1}-1)+1 for the directed n-cycle C_n, for n >= 2. We also prove that, for finite simple digraphs with at least two vertices, stack(D) is defined precisely for strongly connected digraphs, and clear(D) is defined precisely for strongly connected digraphs whose directed cycle lengths have greatest common divisor 1.

Suppose that pebbles are distributed on the vertices of a graph G. A pebbling step along an edge uv removes two pebbles from u and places one pebble on v. We introduce two new graph parameters: stack(G): the least integer t such that every configuration with t pebbles can be transformed, by a finite sequence of pebbling steps, into a configuration with all pebbles on a single vertex. clear(G): defined analogously, but requiring that from every configuration with t pebbles, all but one pebble can be removed. We prove that stack(G) is defined exactly for connected graphs, and that clear(G) is defined exactly for connected non-bipartite graphs. We also establish general upper bounds for these parameters; in particular, stack(G), clear(G) <= 2 |V(G)| 2^diam(G), where diam(G) denotes the diameter of G. Among our exact results are the equalities stack(K_n) = clear(K_n) = n + 1, stack(K_{m,n}) = 3 max{m,n} + 1, stack(P_n) = 2^n - 1. We also establish general lower bounds in terms of the independence number and odd closed walks. For cycles, the situation is more delicate. We prove the lower bounds stack(C_{2n}) >= 2^{n+1} - 1, clear(C_{2n+1}) >= 3 * 2^n - 2, and formulate the Almost Stacked Hypothesis, motivated by Sjostrand's cover pebbling theorem. Assuming this hypothesis, we obtain stack(C_{2n}) = 2^{n+1} - 1, clear(C_{2n+1}) = 3 * 2^n - 2. At present, we do not have a conjecture for the exact value of stack(C_{2n+1}). Finally, computational evidence leads us to a conjectural closed formula for the stacking number of a tree in terms of the distances and degrees of the vertices relative to a chosen root.

Graph pebbling is a game played on graphs with pebbles on their vertices. A pebbling move removes two pebbles from one vertex and places one pebble on an adjacent vertex. The pebbling number is the smallest $t$ so that from any initial configuration of $t$ pebbles it is possible, after a sequence of pebbling moves, to place a pebble on any given target vertex. Graphs whose pebbling number is equal to the number of vertices are called Class~$0$ and provide a challenging set of graphs that resist being characterized. In this note, we answer a question recently proposed by the pioneering study on the pebbling number of snark graphs: we prove that the smallest Flower snark $J_3$ is Class~$0$, establishing that $J_3$ is in fact the only Class~$0$ Flower snark.

Graph pebbling is a game played on graphs with pebbles on their vertices. A pebbling move removes two pebbles from one vertex and places one pebble on an adjacent vertex. A configuration $C$ is a supply of pebbles at various vertices of a graph $G$, and a distribution $D$ is a demand of pebbles at various vertices of $G$. The $D$-pebbling number, $π(G, D)$, of a graph $G$ is defined to be the minimum number $m$ such that every configuration of $m$ pebbles can satisfy the demand $D$ via pebbling moves. The special case in which $t$ pebbles are demanded on vertex $v$ is denoted $D=v^t$, and the $t$-fold pebbling number, $π_{t}(G)$, equals $\max_{v\in G}π(G,v^t)$. It was conjectured by Alcón, Gutierrez, and Hurlbert that the pebbling numbers of chordal graphs forbidding the pyramid graph can be calculated in polynomial time. Trees, of course, are the most prominent of such graphs. In 1989, Chung determined $π_t(T)$ for all trees $T$. In this paper, we provide a polynomial-time algorithm to compute the pebbling numbers $π(T,D)$ for all distributions $D$ on any tree $T$, and characterize maximum-size configurations that do not satisfy $D$.

Given a configuration of indistinguishable pebbles on the vertices of a graph, a pebbling move consists of removing two pebbles from one vertex and placing one pebble on an adjacent vertex. The pebbling number of a graph is the least integer such that any configuration with that many pebbles and any target vertex, some sequence of pebbling moves can place a pebble on the target. Graham's conjecture asserts that the pebbling number of the cartesian product of two graphs is at most the product of the two graphs' pebbling numbers. Products of so-called Lemke graphs are widely thought to be the most likely counterexamples to Graham's conjecture, provided one exists. In this paper, we introduce a novel framework for computing pebbling numbers using bilevel optimization. We use this approach to algorithmically show that the pebbling numbers of all products of 8-vertex Lemke graphs are consistent with Graham's conjecture, with the added assumption that pebbles can only be placed on a set of at most four vertices.

Let $G=(V,E)$ be a simple graph. A function $φ:V\rightarrow \mathbb{N}\cup \{0\}$ is called a configuration of pebbles on the vertices of $G$ and the quantity $\sum_{u\in V}φ(u)$ is called the size of $φ$ which is just the total number of pebbles assigned to vertices. A pebbling step from a vertex $u$ to one of its neighbors $v$ reduces $φ(u)$ by two and increases $φ(v)$ by one. Given a specified target vertex $r$ we say that $φ$ is $t$-fold $r$-solvable, if some sequence of pebbling steps places at least $t$ pebbles on $r$. Conversely, if no such steps exist, then $φ$ is $r$-unsolvable. The minimum positive integer $m$ such that every configuration of size $m$ on the vertices of $G$ is $t$-fold $r$-solvable is denoted by $π_t(G,r)$. The $t$-fold pebbling number of $G$ is defined to be $π_t(G)= max_{r\in V(G)}π_t(G,r)$. When $t=1$, we simply write $π(G)$, which is the pebbling number of $G$. In this note, we study the pebbling number for some specific graphs. Also we investigate the pebbling number of corona and neighbourhood corona of two graphs.

Graph pebbling is a combinatorial game played on an undirected graph with an initial configuration of pebbles. A pebbling move consists of removing two pebbles from one vertex and placing one pebble on an adjacent vertex. The pebbling number of a graph is the smallest number of pebbles necessary such that, given any initial configuration of pebbles, at least one pebble can be moved to a specified root vertex. Recent lines of inquiry apply computational techniques to pebbling bound generation and improvement. Along these lines, we present a computational framework that produces a set of tree strategy weight functions that are capable of proving pebbling number upper bounds on a connected graph. Our mixed-integer linear programming approach automates the generation of large sets of such functions and provides verifiable certificates of pebbling number upper bounds. The framework is capable of producing verifiable pebbling bounds on any connected graph, regardless of its structure or pebbling properties. We apply the model to the 4th weak Bruhat to prove $π(B_4) \leq 66$ and to the Lemke square graph to produce a set of certificates that verify $π(L x L) \leq 96$.

Here we introduce a new game on graphs, called cup stacking, following a line of what can be considered as $0$-, $1$-, or $2$-person games such as chip firing, percolation, graph burning, zero forcing, cops and robbers, graph pebbling, and graph pegging, among others. It can be more general, but the most basic scenario begins with a single cup on each vertex of a graph. (This simplification coincides with an earlier game devised by Gordon Hamilton.) For a vertex with $k$ cups on it we can move all its cups to a vertex at distance $k$ from it, provided the second vertex already has at least one cup on it. The object is to stack all cups onto some pre-described target vertex. We say that a graph is stackable if this can be accomplished for all possible target vertices. In this paper we study cup stacking on many families of graphs, developing a characterization of stackability in graphs and using it to prove the stackability of complete graphs, paths, cycles, grids, the Petersen graph, many Kneser graphs, some trees, cubes of dimension up to 20, "somewhat balanced" complete $t$-partite graphs, and Hamiltonian diameter two graphs. Additionally we use the Gallai-Edmonds Structure Theorem, the Edmonds Blossom Algorithm, and the Hungarian algorithm to devise a polynomial algorithm to decide if a diameter two graph is stackable. Our proof that cubes up to dimension 20 are stackable uses Kleitman's Symmetric Chain Decomposition and the new result of Merino, Mütze, and Namrata that all generalized Johnson graphs (excluding the Petersen graph) are Hamiltonian. We conjecture that all cubes and higher-dimensional grids are stackable, and leave the reader with several open problems, questions, and generalizations.

Given a configuration of pebbles on the vertices of a graph $G$, a pebbling move removes two pebbles from a vertex and puts one pebble on an adjacent vertex. The pebbling number of a graph $G$ is the smallest number of pebbles required such that, given an arbitrary initial configuration of pebbles, one pebble can be moved to any vertex of $G$ through some sequence of pebbling moves. Through constructing a non-tree weight function for $Q_4$, we improve the weight function technique, introduced by Hurlbert and extended by Cranston et al., that gives an upper bound for the pebbling number of graphs. Then, we propose a conjecture on weight functions for the $n$-dimensional cube. We also construct a set of valid weight functions for variations of lollipop graphs, extending previously known constructions.

For an additive group $Γ$ the sequence $S = (g_1, \ldots, g_t)$ of elements of $Γ$ is a zero-sum sequence if $g_1 + \cdots + g_t = 0_Γ$. The cross number of $S$ is defined to be the sum $\sum_{i=1}^k 1/|g_i|$, where $|g_i|$ denotes the order of $g_i$ in $Γ$. Call $S$ good if it contains a zero-sum subsequence with cross number at most 1. In 1993, Geroldinger proved that if $Γ$ is abelian then every length $|Γ|$ sequence of its elements is good, generalizing a 1989 result of Lemke and Kleitman that had proved an earlier conjecture of Erdős and Lemke. In 1989 Chung re-proved the Lemke and Kleitman result by applying a theorem of graph pebbling, and in 2005, Elledge and Hurlbert used graph pebbling to re-prove and generalize Geroldinger's result. Here we use probabilistic theorems from graph pebbling to derive a threshold version of Geroldinger's theorem for abelian groups of a certain form. Specifically, we prove that if $p_1, \ldots, p_d$ are (not necessarily distinct) primes and $Γ_k$ has the form $\prod_{i=1}^d {\mathbb Z}_{p_i^k}$ then there is a function $τ=τ(k)$ (which we specify in Theorem 4) with the following property: if $t-τ\rightarrow\infty$ as $k\rightarrow\infty$ then the probability that $S$ is good in $Γ_k$ tends to 1.

Graph pebbling is a game played on graphs with pebbles on their vertices. A pebbling move removes two pebbles from one vertex and places one pebble on an adjacent vertex. The pebbling number $π(G)$ is the smallest $t$ so that from any initial configuration of $t$ pebbles it is possible, after a sequence of pebbling moves, to place a pebble on any given target vertex. In this paper, we provide the first results on the pebbling numbers of snarks. Until now, only the Petersen graph had its pebbling number correctly established, although attempts had been made for the Flower and Watkins snarks.

The topic of this treatise is a combinatorial technique called Graph Pebbling. We investigate pebbling numbers, weight functions, flow networks, hypercubes, and the zero-sum conjecture of Erdős and Lemke. This investigation is a comprehensive starting point for anyone who wants to study graph pebbling for the first time, and also includes some new ideas and results for those who have studied it before. For an introductory video, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPzyQ4M1f3c

Here we merge the two fields of Cops and Robbers and Graph Pebbling to introduce the new topic of Cops and Robbers Pebbling. Both paradigms can be described by moving tokens (the cops) along the edges of a graph to capture a special token (the robber). In Cops and Robbers, all tokens move freely, whereas, in Graph Pebbling, some of the chasing tokens disappear with movement while the robber is stationary. In Cops and Robbers Pebbling, some of the chasing tokens (cops) disappear with movement, while the robber moves freely. We define the cop pebbling number of a graph to be the minimum number of cops necessary to capture the robber in this context, and present upper and lower bounds and exact values, some involving various domination parameters, for an array of graph classes, including paths, cycles, trees, chordal graphs, high girth graphs, and cop-win graphs, as well as graph products. Furthermore we show that the analogous inequality for Graham's Pebbling Conjecture fails for cop pebbling and posit a conjecture along the lines of Meyniel's Cops and Robbers Conjecture that may hold for cop pebbling. We also offer several new problems.

In this paper, we extend the ideas of graph pebbling to oriented graphs and find a classification for all graphs with fully traversable pebbling assignments that are isomorphic to their assignment graph. We then give some cases in which a graph with a non-fully traversable pebbling assignment is isomorphic to its assignment graph.

Graph pebbling is a network optimization model for satisfying vertex demands with vertex supplies (called pebbles), with partial loss of pebbles in transit. The pebbling number of a demand in a graph is the smallest number for which every placement of that many supply pebbles satisfies the demand. The Target Conjecture (Herscovici-Hester-Hurlbert, 2009) posits that the largest pebbling number of a demand of fixed size $t$ occurs when the demand is entirely stacked on one vertex. This truth of this conjecture could be useful for attacking many open problems in graph pebbling, including the famous conjecture of Graham (1989) involving graph products. It has been verified for complete graphs, cycles, cubes, and trees. In this paper we prove the conjecture for 2-paths and Kneser graphs over pairs.

Graph pebbling models the transportation of consumable resources. As two pebbles move across an edge, one reaches its destination while the other is consumed. The $t$-pebbling number is the smallest integer $m$ so that any initially distributed supply of $m$ pebbles can place $t$ pebbles on any target vertex via pebbling moves. The 1-pebbling number of diameter two graphs is well-studied. Here we investigate the $t$-pebbling number of diameter two graphs under the lense of connectivity.

A pebbling move refers to the act of removing two pebbles from one vertex and placing one pebble on an adjacent vertex. The goal of graph pebbling is: Given an initial distribution of pebbles, use pebbling moves to reach a specified goal vertex called the root. The pebbling number of a graph $π(G)$ is the minimum number of pebbles needed so every distribution of $π(G)$ pebbles can reach every choice of the root. We introduce a new variant of graph pebbling, a game between two players. One player aims to move a pebble to the root and the other player aims to prevent this. We show configurations of various classes of graphs for which each player has a winning strategy. We will characterize the winning player for a specific class of diameter two graphs.

Graph Pebbling is a well-studied single-player game on graphs. We introduce the game of Blocking Pebbles which adapts Graph Pebbling into a two-player strategy game in order to examine it within the context of Combinatorial Game Theory. Positions with game values matching all integers, all nimbers, and many infinitesimals and switches are found.

Graph pebbling is a network model for transporting discrete resources that are consumed in transit. Deciding whether a given configuration on a particular graph can reach a specified target is ${\sf NP}$-complete, even for diameter two graphs, and deciding whether the pebbling number has a prescribed upper bound is $Π_2^{\sf P}$-complete. Recently we proved that the pebbling number of a split graph can be computed in polynomial time. This paper advances the program of finding other polynomial classes, moving away from the large tree width, small diameter case (such as split graphs) to small tree width, large diameter, continuing an investigation on the important subfamily of chordal graphs called $k$-trees. In particular, we provide a formula, that can be calculated in polynomial time, for the pebbling number of any semi-2-tree, falling shy of the result for the full class of 2-trees.

Given a configuration of pebbles on the vertices of a connected graph $G$, a \emph{pebbling move} removes two pebbles from some vertex and places one pebble on an adjacent vertex. The \emph{pebbling number} of a graph $G$ is the smallest integer $k$ such that for each vertex $v$ and each configuration of $k$ pebbles on $G$ there is a sequence of pebbling moves that places at least one pebble on $v$. First, we improve on results of Hurlbert, who introduced a linear optimization technique for graph pebbling. In particular, we use a different set of weight functions, based on graphs more general than trees. We apply this new idea to some graphs from Hurlbert's paper to give improved bounds on their pebbling numbers. Second, we investigate the structure of Class 0 graphs with few edges. We show that every $n$-vertex Class 0 graph has at least $\frac53n - \frac{11}3$ edges. This disproves a conjecture of Blasiak et al. For diameter 2 graphs, we strengthen this lower bound to $2n - 5$, which is best possible. Further, we characterize the graphs where the bound holds with equality and extend the argument to obtain an identical bound for diameter 2 graphs with no cut-vertex.