arXiv++ Combinatorics

Let $d \geq 1$ be an integer. From a set of $d$-dimensional vectors, we obtain a $d$-\dpg\ by letting each vector $\va^u$ correspond to a vertex $u$ and by adding an edge between two vertices $u$ and $v$ if and only if their dot product $\va^{u} \cdot \va^{v} \geq t$, for some fixed, positive threshold~$t$. Dot product graphs can be used to model social networks. Recognizing a $d$-dot product graph is known to be \NP-hard for all fixed $d\geq 2$. To understand the position of $d$-dot product graphs in the landscape of graph classes, we consider the case $d=2$, and investigate how $2$-dot product graphs relate to a number of other known graph classes including a number of well-known classes of intersection graphs.

Let $G$ be a graph with a vertex colouring $α$. Let $a$ and $b$ be two colours. Then a connected component of the subgraph induced by those vertices coloured either $a$ or $b$ is known as a Kempe chain. A colouring of $G$ obtained from $α$ by swapping the colours on the vertices of a Kempe chain is said to have been obtained by a Kempe change. Two colourings of $G$ are Kempe equivalent if one can be obtained from the other by a sequence of Kempe changes. A conjecture of Mohar (2007) asserts that, for $k \geq 3$, all $k$-colourings of a $k$-regular graph that is not complete are Kempe equivalent. It was later shown that all $3$-colourings of a cubic graph that is neither $K_4$ nor the triangular prism are Kempe equivalent. In this paper, we prove that the conjecture holds for each $k\geq 4$. We also report the implications of this result on the validity of the Wang-Swendsen-Kotecký algorithm for the antiferromagnetic Potts model at zero-temperature.

Given a graph $G$ and an integer $r\geq 1$, let $\mathcal{I}^{(r)}(G)$ denote the family of independent sets of size $r$ of $G$. For a vertex $v$ of $G$, let $\mathcal{I}^{(r)}_v(G)$ denote the family of independent sets of size $r$ that contain~$v$. This family is called an $r$-star and $v$ is the centre of the star. Then $G$ is said to be $r$-EKR if no pairwise intersecting subfamily of $\mathcal{I}^{(r)}(G)$ is bigger than the largest $r$-star, and if every maximum size pairwise intersecting subfamily of $\mathcal{I}^{(r)}(G)$ is an $r$-star, then $G$ is said to be strictly $r$-EKR. Let $μ(G)$ denote the minimum size of a maximal independent set of $G$. Holroyd and Talbot conjectured that if $2r \leq μ(G)$, then $G$ is $r$-EKR and strictly $r$-EKR if $2r < μ(G)$. An elongated claw is a tree in which one vertex is designated the root and no vertex other than the root has degree greater than 2. A depth-two claw is an elongated claw in which every vertex of degree~1 is at distance 2 from the root. We show that if $G$ is a depth-two claw, then $G$ is strictly $r$-EKR if $2r \leq μ(G)+1$, confirming the conjecture of Holroyd and Talbot for this family. We also show that if $G $ is an elongated claw with $n$ leaves and at least one leaf adjacent to the root, then $G$ is $r$-EKR if $2r \leq n$. Hurlbert and Kamat had conjectured that one can always find a largest $r$-star of a tree whose centre is a leaf. Baber and Borg have separately shown this to be false. We show that, moreover, for all $n \geq 2$, $d \geq 3$, there exists a positive integer $r$ such that there is a tree where the centre of the largest $r$-star is a vertex of degree $n$ at distance at least $d$ from every leaf.

A colouring of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a function $c: V\rightarrow\{1,2,\ldots \}$ such that $c(u)\neq c(v)$ for every $uv\in E$. A $k$-regular list assignment of $G$ is a function $L$ with domain $V$ such that for every $u\in V$, $L(u)$ is a subset of $\{1, 2, \dots\}$ of size $k$. A colouring $c$ of $G$ respects a $k$-regular list assignment $L$ of $G$ if $c(u)\in L(u)$ for every $u\in V$. A graph $G$ is $k$-choosable if for every $k$-regular list assignment $L$ of $G$, there exists a colouring of $G$ that respects $L$. We may also ask if for a given $k$-regular list assignment $L$ of a given graph $G$, there exists a colouring of $G$ that respects $L$. This yields the $k$-Regular List Colouring problem. For $k\in \{3,4\}$ we determine a family of classes ${\cal G}$ of planar graphs, such that either $k$-Regular List Colouring is NP-complete for instances $(G,L)$ with $G\in {\cal G}$, or every $G\in {\cal G}$ is $k$-choosable. By using known examples of non-$3$-choosable and non-$4$-choosable graphs, this enables us to classify the complexity of $k$-Regular List Colouring restricted to planar graphs, planar bipartite graphs, planar triangle-free graphs and to planar graphs with no $4$-cycles and no $5$-cycles. We also classify the complexity of $k$-Regular List Colouring and a number of related colouring problems for graphs with bounded maximum degree.

Given a graph $G=(V,E)$ and a proper vertex colouring of $G$, a Kempe chain is a subset of $V$ that induces a maximal connected subgraph of $G$ in which every vertex has one of two colours. To make a Kempe change is to obtain one colouring from another by exchanging the colours of vertices in a Kempe chain. Two colourings are Kempe equivalent if each can be obtained from the other by a series of Kempe changes. A conjecture of Mohar asserts that, for $k \geq 3$, all $k$-colourings of $k$-regular graphs that are not complete are Kempe equivalent. We address the case $k=3$ by showing that all $3$-colourings of a cubic graph $G$ are Kempe equivalent unless $G$ is the complete graph $K_4$ or the triangular prism.

For a positive integer $k$ and graph $G=(V,E)$, a $k$-colouring of $G$ is a mapping $c: V\rightarrow\{1,2,\ldots,k\}$ such that $c(u)\neq c(v)$ whenever $uv\in E$. The $k$-Colouring problem is to decide, for a given $G$, whether a $k$-colouring of $G$ exists. The $k$-Precolouring Extension problem is to decide, for a given $G=(V,E)$, whether a colouring of a subset of $V$ can be extended to a $k$-colouring of $G$. A $k$-list assignment of a graph is an allocation of a list -a subset of $\{1,\ldots,k\}$- to each vertex, and the List $k$-Colouring problem is to decide, for a given $G$, whether $G$ has a $k$-colouring in which each vertex is coloured with a colour from its list. We continued the study of the computational complexity of these three decision problems when restricted to graphs that contain neither a cycle on $s$ vertices nor a path on $t$ vertices as induced subgraphs (for fixed positive integers $s$ and~$t$).

For a positive integer $k$, a $k$-colouring of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a mapping $c: V\rightarrow\{1,2,...,k\}$ such that $c(u)\neq c(v)$ whenever $uv\in E$. The Colouring problem is to decide, for a given $G$ and $k$, whether a $k$-colouring of $G$ exists. If $k$ is fixed (that is, it is not part of the input), we have the decision problem $k$-Colouring instead. We survey known results on the computational complexity of Colouring and $k$-Colouring for graph classes that are characterized by one or two forbidden induced subgraphs. We also consider a number of variants: for example, where the problem is to extend a partial colouring, or where lists of permissible colours are given for each vertex.