arXiv++ Combinatorics

We give a near-linear time 4-coloring algorithm for planar graphs, improving on the previous quadratic time algorithm by Robertson et al. from 1996. Such an algorithm cannot be achieved by the known proofs of the Four Color Theorem (4CT). Technically speaking, we show the following significant generalization of the 4CT: every planar triangulation contains linearly many pairwise non-touching reducible configurations or pairwise non-crossing obstructing cycles of length at most 5 (which all allow for making effective 4-coloring reductions). The known proofs of the 4CT only show the existence of a single reducible configuration or obstructing cycle in the above statement. The existence is proved using the discharging method based on combinatorial curvature. It identifies reducible configurations in parts where the local neighborhood has positive combinatorial curvature. Our result significantly strengthens the known proofs of 4CT, showing that we can also find reductions in large ``flat" parts where the curvature is zero, and moreover, we can make reductions almost anywhere in a given planar graph. An interesting aspect of this is that such large flat parts are also found in large triangulations of any fixed surface. From a computational perspective, the old proofs allowed us to apply induction on a problem that is smaller by some additive constant. The inductive step took linear time, resulting in a quadratic total time. With our linear number of reducible configurations or obstructing cycles, we can reduce the problem size by a constant factor. Our inductive step takes $O(n\log n)$ time, yielding a 4-coloring in $O(n\log n)$ total time. In order to efficiently handle a linear number of reducible configurations, we need them to have certain robustness that could also be useful in other applications. All our reducible configurations are what is known as D-reducible.

We consider the problem of coloring a 3-colorable graph in polynomial time using as few colors as possible. This is one of the most challenging problems in graph algorithms. In this paper using Blum's notion of ``progress'', we develop a new combinatorial algorithm for the following: Given any 3-colorable graph with minimum degree $\ds>\sqrt n$, we can, in polynomial time, make progress towards a $k$-coloring for some $k=\sqrt{n/\ds}\cdot n^{o(1)}$. We balance our main result with the best-known semi-definite(SDP) approach which we use for degrees below $n^{0.605073}$. As a result, we show that $\tO(n^{0.19747})$ colors suffice for coloring 3-colorable graphs. This improves on the previous best bound of $\tO(n^{0.19996})$ by Kawarabayashi and Thorup in 2017.

The three-in-a-tree problem is to determine if a simple undirected graph contains an induced subgraph which is a tree connecting three given vertices. Based on a beautiful characterization that is proved in more than twenty pages, Chudnovsky and Seymour [Combinatorica 2010] gave the previously only known polynomial-time algorithm, running in $O(mn^2)$ time, to solve the three-in-a-tree problem on an $n$-vertex $m$-edge graph. Their three-in-a-tree algorithm has become a critical subroutine in several state-of-the-art graph recognition and detection algorithms. In this paper we solve the three-in-a-tree problem in $\tilde{O}(m)$ time, leading to improved algorithms for recognizing perfect graphs and detecting thetas, pyramids, beetles, and odd and even holes. Our result is based on a new and more constructive characterization than that of Chudnovsky and Seymour. Our new characterization is stronger than the original, and our proof implies a new simpler proof for the original characterization. The improved characterization gains the first factor $n$ in speed. The remaining improvement is based on dynamic graph algorithms.

Recently, Kawarabayashi and Thorup presented the first deterministic edge-connectivity recognition algorithm in near-linear time. A crucial step in their algorithm uses the existence of vertex subsets of a simple graph $G$ on $n$ vertices whose contractions leave a multigraph with $\tilde{O}(n/δ)$ vertices and $\tilde{O}(n)$ edges that preserves all non-trivial min-cuts of $G$, where $δ$ is the minimum degree of $G$ and $\tilde{O}$ hides logarithmic factors. We present a simple argument that improves this contraction-based sparsifier by eliminating the poly-logarithmic factors, that is, we show a contraction-based sparsification that leaves $O(n/δ)$ vertices and $O(n)$ edges, preserves all non-trivial min-cuts and can be computed in near-linear time $\tilde{O}(m)$, where $m$ is the number of edges of $G$. We also obtain that every simple graph has $O((n/δ)^2)$ non-trivial min-cuts. Our approach allows to represent all non-trivial min-cuts of a graph by a cactus representation, whose cactus graph has $O(n/δ)$ vertices. Moreover, this cactus representation can be derived directly from the standard cactus representation of all min-cuts in linear time. We apply this compact structure to show that all min-cuts can be explicitly listed in $\tilde{O}(m) + O(n^2 / δ)$ time for every simple graph, which improves the previous best time bound $O(nm)$ given by Gusfield and Naor.

We describe a way of assigning labels to the vertices of any undirected graph on up to $n$ vertices, each composed of $n/2+O(1)$ bits, such that given the labels of two vertices, and no other information regarding the graph, it is possible to decide whether or not the vertices are adjacent in the graph. This is optimal, up to an additive constant, and constitutes the first improvement in almost 50 years of an $n/2+O(\log n)$ bound of Moon. As a consequence, we obtain an induced-universal graph for $n$-vertex graphs containing only $O(2^{n/2})$ vertices, which is optimal up to a multiplicative constant, solving an open problem of Vizing from 1968. We obtain similar tight results for directed graphs, tournaments and bipartite graphs.

We consider the problem of coloring a 3-colorable graph in polynomial time using as few colors as possible. We present a combinatorial algorithm getting down to $\tO(n^{4/11})$ colors. This is the first combinatorial improvement of Blum's $\tO(n^{3/8})$ bound from FOCS'90. Like Blum's algorithm, our new algorithm composes nicely with recent semi-definite approaches. The current best bound is $O(n^{0.2072})$ colors by Chlamtac from FOCS'07. We now bring it down to $O(n^{0.2038})$ colors.

We consider a the minimum k-way cut problem for unweighted graphs with a size bound s on the number of cut edges allowed. Thus we seek to remove as few edges as possible so as to split a graph into k components, or report that this requires cutting more than s edges. We show that this problem is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) in s. More precisely, for s=O(1), our algorithm runs in quadratic time while we have a different linear time algorithm for planar graphs and bounded genus graphs. Our tractability result stands in contrast to known W[1] hardness of related problems. Without the size bound, Downey et al.[2003] proved that the minimum k-way cut problem is W[1] hard in k even for simple unweighted graphs. Downey et al. asked about the status for planar graphs. Our result implies tractability in k for the planar graphs since the minimum k-way cut of a planar graph is of size at most 6k (more generally, we get tractability in k for any graph class with k-way cuts of size limited by is a function of k, e.g., bounded degree graphs, or simple graphs with an excluded minor). A simple reduction shows that vertex cuts are at least as hard as edge cuts, so the minimum k-way vertex cut is also W[1] hard in terms of k. Marx [2004] proved that finding a minimum k-way vertex cut of size s is also W[1] hard in s. Marx asked about the FPT status with edge cuts, which we prove tractable here. We are not aware of any other cut problem where the vertex version is W[1] hard but the edge version is FPT.

How far can a stack of $n$ identical blocks be made to hang over the edge of a table? The question dates back to at least the middle of the 19th century and the answer to it was widely believed to be of order $\log n$. Recently, Paterson and Zwick constructed $n$-block stacks with overhangs of order $n^{1/3}$, exponentially better than previously thought possible. We show here that order $n^{1/3}$ is indeed best possible, resolving the long-standing overhang problem up to a constant factor.