arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Nihan Tanısalı

2 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
2026-09-06
High dimensional Riemann--Roch spaces in linear spaces with small squares
Let $F$ be a function field over an algebraically closed field $K$ and $S$ a finite dimensional $K$-subspace of $F$. The square of $S$ is spanned by all products of pairs of elements in $S$. We conjecture that if $\dim S^2 \leq 3 \dim S - 4$, then $S^2$ must contain a Riemann--Roch space of dimension at least $2 \dim S - 1 + g$, where $g$ is the genus of $F$. This generalizes a theorem of Freiman from additive combinatorics, stating that small sumsets must contain long arithmetic progressions. We prove our conjecture in the case that $S$ is contained in a Riemann--Roch space of dimension at most $3/2\dim S + 1$. For the proof we study the annihilator of $S$ and introduce the notion of weight for linear forms.
Box Progressions, Abelian Power-Free Morphisms and A Sieve Technique for the Template Method
Given balls and boxes both enumerated by the positive integers, we consider a sequential allocation of the balls into the boxes. We fix $\ell \ge 2$. Proceeding in increasing order of box labels, assign to each box the next $r$ smallest balls for some $ 1\leq r\leq\ell$. Given an integer $k\ge 3$, is there a natural number $N$ such that in any placement of $N$ balls into boxes, there exist $k$ balls whose labels and box labels each form a $k$-term arithmetic progression? We address this question by identifying abelian power-free fixed points of morphisms over a binary alphabet. We present sufficient conditions under which a morphism is abelian $k$-power-free. Our conditions extend Dekking's result over a binary alphabet and offer a weaker, yet more effective alternative to Carpi's. Combining Dekking's result with the template method of Currie and Rampersad, we develop a sieve technique that significantly reduces the number of parents that must be examined to establish abelian power-freeness. We then identify a binary morphism that is abelian 16-power free (but not abelian $15$-power free) with an abelian 14-power free fixed point, demonstrating the strength of our technique in verifying abelian power-freeness. Furthermore, we give a binary morphism which is not abelian power-free, yet has an abelian $5$-power free fixed point. These results offer novel examples of morphisms whose fixed points exhibit stronger abelian power-freeness than the corresponding morphisms.