arXiv++ Combinatorics

For the Erdős-Rényi random graph G(n,p), we give a precise asymptotic formula for the size of a largest vertex subset in G(n,p) that induces a subgraph with average degree at most t, provided that p = p(n) is not too small and t = t(n) is not too large. In the case of fixed t and p, we find that this value is asymptotically almost surely concentrated on at most two explicitly given points. This generalises a result on the independence number of random graphs. For both the upper and lower bounds, we rely on large deviations inequalities for the binomial distribution.

A bootstrap percolation process on a graph $G$ is an "infection" process which evolves in rounds. Initially, there is a subset of infected nodes and in each subsequent round each uninfected node which has at least $r$ infected neighbours becomes infected and remains so forever. The parameter $r\geq 2$ is fixed. Such processes have been used as models for the spread of ideas or trends within a network of individuals. We analyse bootstrap percolation process in the case where the underlying graph is an inhomogeneous random graph, which exhibits a power-law degree distribution, and initially there are $a(n)$ randomly infected nodes. The main focus of this paper is the number of vertices that will have been infected by the end of the process. The main result of this work is that if the degree sequence of the random graph follows a power law with exponent $β$, where $2 < β< 3$, then a sublinear number of initially infected vertices is enough to spread the infection over a linear fraction of the nodes of the random graph, with high probability. More specifically, we determine explicitly a critical function $a_c(n)$ such that $a_c(n)=o(n)$ with the following property. Assuming that $n$ is the number of vertices of the underlying random graph, if $a(n) \ll a_c(n)$, then the process does not evolve at all, with high probability as $n$ grows, whereas if $a(n)\gg a_c(n)$, then there is a constant $\eps>0$ such that, with high probability, the final set of infected vertices has size at least $\eps n$. It turns out that when the maximum degree is $o(n^{1/(β-1)})$, then $a_c(n)$ depends also on $r$. But when the maximum degree is $Θ(n^{1/(β-1)})$, then $a_c (n)=n^{β-2 \over β-1}$.

Broadcasting algorithms are important building blocks of distributed systems. In this work we investigate the typical performance of the classical and well-studied push model. Assume that initially one node in a given network holds some piece of information. In each round, every one of the informed nodes chooses independently a neighbor uniformly at random and transmits the message to it. In this paper we consider random networks where each vertex has degree d, which is at least 3, i.e., the underlying graph is drawn uniformly at random from the set of all d-regular graphs with n vertices. We show that with probability 1 - o(1) the push model broadcasts the message to all nodes within (1 + o(1))C_d ln n rounds, where C_d = 1/ ln(2(1-1/d)) - 1/(d ln(1 - 1/d)). In particular, we can characterize precisely the effect of the node degree to the typical broadcast time of the push model. Moreover, we consider pseudo-random regular networks, where we assume that the degree of each node is very large. There we show that the broadcast time is (1+o(1))C ln n with probability 1 - o(1), where C= 1/ ln 2 + 1, is the limit of C_d as d grows.

The paradigm of many choices has influenced significantly the design of efficient data structures and, most notably, hash tables. Cuckoo hashing is a technique that extends this concept. There,we are given a table with $n$ locations, and we assume that each location can hold one item. Each item to be inserted chooses randomly k>1 locations and has to be placed in any one of them. How much load can cuckoo hashing handle before collisions prevent the successful assignment of the available items to the chosen locations? Practical evaluations of this method have shown that one can allocate a number of elements that is a large proportion of the size of the table, being very close to 1 even for small values of k such as 4 or 5. In this paper we show that there is a critical value for this proportion: with high probability, when the amount of available items is below this value, then these can be allocated successfully, but when it exceeds this value, the allocation becomes impossible. We give explicitly for each k>1 this critical value. This answers an open question posed by Mitzenmacher (ESA '09) and underpins theoretically the experimental results. Our proofs are based on the translation of the question into a hypergraph setting, and the study of the related typical properties of random k-uniform hypergraphs.

The study of the structural properties of large random planar graphs has become in recent years a field of intense research in computer science and discrete mathematics. Nowadays, a random planar graph is an important and challenging model for evaluating methods that are developed to study properties of random graphs from classes with structural side constraints. In this paper we focus on the structure of random biconnected planar graphs regarding the sizes of their 3-connected building blocks, which we call cores. In fact, we prove a general theorem regarding random biconnected graphs. If B_n is a graph drawn uniformly at random from a class B of labeled biconnected graphs, then we show that with probability 1-o(1) B_n belongs to exactly one of the following categories: (i) Either there is a unique giant core in B_n, that is, there is a 0 < c < 1 such that the largest core contains ~ cn vertices, and every other core contains at most n^a vertices, where 0 < a < 1; (ii) or all cores of B_n contain O(log n) vertices. Moreover, we find the critical condition that determines the category to which B_n belongs, and also provide sharp concentration results for the counts of cores of all sizes between 1 and n. As a corollary, we obtain that a random biconnected planar graph belongs to category (i), where in particular c = 0.765... and a = 2/3.

Broadcasting algorithms are of fundamental importance for distributed systems engineering. In this paper we revisit the classical and well-studied push protocol for message broadcasting. Assuming that initially only one node has some piece of information, at each stage every one of the informed nodes chooses randomly and independently one of its neighbors and passes the message to it. The performance of the push protocol on a fully connected network, where each node is joined by a link to every other node, is very well understood. In particular, Frieze and Grimmett proved that with probability 1-o(1) the push protocol completes the broadcasting of the message within (1 +/- ε) (log_2 n + ln n) stages, where n is the number of nodes of the network. However, there are no tight bounds for the broadcast time on networks that are significantly sparser than the complete graph. In this work we consider random networks on n nodes, where every edge is present with probability p, independently of every other edge. We show that if p > f(n)ln n/ n, where f(n) is any function that tends to infinity as n grows, then the push protocol broadcasts the message within (1 +/- ε) (log_2 n + ln n) stages with probability 1-o(1). In other words, in almost every network of density d such that d > f(n)ln n, the push protocol broadcasts a message as fast as in a fully connected network. This is quite surprising in the sense that the time needed remains essentially unaffected by the fact that most of the links are missing.

Given a graph G = (V,E), a vertex subset S is called t-stable (or t-dependent) if the subgraph G[S] induced on S has maximum degree at most t. The t-stability number of G is the maximum order of a t-stable set in G. We investigate the typical values that this parameter takes on a random graph on n vertices and edge probability equal to p. For any fixed 0 < p < 1 and fixed non-negative integer t, we show that, with probability tending to 1 as n grows, the t-stability number takes on at most two values which we identify as functions of t, p and n. The main tool we use is an asymptotic expression for the expected number of t-stable sets of order k. We derive this expression by performing a precise count of the number of graphs on k vertices that have maximum degree at most k. Using the above results, we also obtain asymptotic bounds on the t-improper chromatic number of a random graph (this is the generalisation of the chromatic number, where we partition of the vertex set of the graph into t-stable sets).

We study the two most common types of percolation process on a sparse random graph with a given degree sequence. Namely, we examine first a bond percolation process where the edges of the graph are retained with probability p and afterwards we focus on site percolation where the vertices are retained with probability p. We establish critical values for p above which a giant component emerges in both cases. Moreover, we show that in fact these coincide. As a special case, our results apply to power law random graphs. We obtain rigorous proofs for formulas derived by several physicists for such graphs.

In this paper we present a study of the mixing time of a random walk on the largest component of a supercritical random graph, also known as the giant component. We identify local obstructions that slow down the random walk, when the average degree d is at most (ln n lnln n)^{1/2}, proving that the mixing time in this case is O((ln n/d)^2) asymptotically almost surely. As the average degree grows these become negligible and it is the diameter of the largest component that takes over, yielding mixing time O(ln n/ln d). We proved these results during the 2003-04 academic year. Similar results but for constant d were later proved independently by I. Benjamini, G. Kozma and N. Wormald.

Chvatal, Roedl, Szemeredi and Trotter proved that the Ramsey numbers of graphs of bounded maximum degree are linear in their order. In previous work, we proved the same result for 3-uniform hypergraphs. Here we extend this result to k-uniform hypergraphs, for any integer k > 3. As in the 3-uniform case, the main new tool which we prove and use is an embedding lemma for k-uniform hypergraphs of bounded maximum degree into suitable k-uniform `quasi-random' hypergraphs.

Chvátal, Rödl, Szemerédi and Trotter proved that the Ramsey numbers of graphs of bounded maximum degree are linear in their order. We prove that the same holds for 3-uniform hypergraphs. The main new tool which we prove and use is an embedding lemma for 3-uniform hypergraphs of bounded maximum degree into suitable 3-uniform `pseudo-random' hypergraphs.