arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Pablo Blanco

5 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
In How Many Ways can a Rectangle be Rectangled?
There are $2^{n-1}$ ways to tile a $1 \times n$ rectangle with rectangular tiles (of any length, of course they all must have width $1$), but in how many ways can you tile a $100 \times 100$ checkerboard with such tiles? Neither humankind, nor computer-kind, will (most probably) ever know the exact number. But it is possible to compute these numbers for $m \times n$ rectangular grids, if $m$ is not too big, while $n$ can be as big as one wishes. This was initially done in 1988 by David Klarner and Spyros Magliveras, and beautifully extended, around 2006, by, at-the-time, first-year LSU undergraduate Joshua Smith, in collaboration with his faculty mentor, Helena Verrill. Here we extend this to weighted-counting, also keeping track of the number of tiles (that ranges from $1$ to $mn$), and the number of participating grid-edges (that range from $2m+2n$ to $2mn+m+n$). This quickly leads to statistical analyses (mean, variance, and higher moments) of these quantities. While we admire the clever approaches of Klarner-Magliveras and Smith-Verrill, we use two alternative approaches to the original problem, that are more amenable for deriving these generalizations. At the same time, we illustrate the power and beauty of experimental-yet-rigorous enumerative combinatorics.
2026-03-25
Counting (and Randomly Generating) Hamiltonian Cycles in Rectangular Grids
We first fully implement, in Maple, the ingenious method of Robert Stoyan and Volker Strehl from 1995 to automatically derive generating functions for the number of Hamiltonian cycles in an m by n grid graph ,for a fixed width m, but general length n, and actually compute these generating functions for all m up to ten. We also show how to generate a uniformly-at-random such Hamiltonian cycle, and also derive more informative generating functions for other parameters besides the length of the grid graph.
2025-07-05 v2
Automated Counting of Spanning Trees for Several Infinite Families of Graphs
Using the theoretical basis developed by Yao and Zeilberger, we consider certain graph families whose structure results in a rational generating function for sequences related to spanning tree enumeration. Said families are Powers of Cycles and Powers of Path; later, we briefly discuss Torus graphs and Grid graphs. In each case we know, a priori, that the set of spanning trees of the family of graphs can be described in terms of a finite-state-machine, and hence there is a finite transfer-matrix that guarantees the generating function is rational. Finding this ``grammar'', and hence the transfer-matrix is very tedious, so a much more efficient approach is to use experimental mathematics. Since computing numerical determinants is so fast, one can use the matrix tree theorem to generate sufficiently many terms, then fit the data to a rational function. The whole procedure can be done rigorously a posteriori.
On tree decompositions whose trees are minors
In 2019, Dvořák asked whether every connected graph $G$ has a tree decomposition $(T, \mathcal{B})$ so that $T$ is a subgraph of $G$ and the width of $(T, \mathcal{B})$ is bounded by a function of the treewidth of $G$. We prove that this is false, even when $G$ has treewidth $2$ and $T$ is allowed to be a minor of $G$.
2022-10-19 v2
Towards the Erdős-Hajnal conjecture for $P_5$-free graphs
Published • View PublicationBIB
The Erdős-Hajnal conjecture is one of the most classical and well-known problems in extremal and structural combinatorics dating back to 1977. It asserts that in stark contrast to the case of a general $n$-vertex graph if one imposes even a little bit of structure on the graph, namely by forbidding a fixed graph $H$ as an induced subgraph, instead of only being able to find a polylogarithmic size clique or an independent set one can find one of polynomial size. Despite being the focus of considerable attention over the years the conjecture remains open. In this paper we improve the best known lower bound of $2^{Ω(\sqrt{\log n})}$ on this question, due to Erdős and Hajnal from 1989, in the smallest open case, namely when one forbids a $P_5$, the path on $5$ vertices. Namely, we show that any $P_5$-free $n$ vertex graph contains a clique or an independent set of size at least $2^{Ω(\log n)^{2/3}}$. Our methods also lead to the same improvement for an infinite family of graphs.