arXiv++ Combinatorics

In 1980, Athreya, Pranesachar and Singhi established the chromatic polynomial of $(3 \times n)$-Latin rectangles whose entries based on a set $\{1, 2, ..., λ\}$ in which $λ\geq n$. Their proof requires Möbius inversion formula and lattice partitions. In this paper, we present a simpler proof by using the idea of mathematical induction and appropriate coloring.

Irredundance coloring of $G$ is a proper coloring in which there exists a maximal irredundant set $R$ such that all the vertices of $R$ have different colors. The minimum number of colors required for an irredundance coloring of $G$ is called the irredundance chromatic number of $G$, and is denoted by $χ_{i}(G)$. Irredundance compelling coloring of $G$ is a proper coloring of $G$ in which every rainbow committee (the set containing a vertex of each color) is an irredundant set of $G$. The maximum number of colors required for an irredundance compelling coloring of $G$ is called the irredundance compelling chromatic number of $G$, and is denoted by $χ_{irc}(G)$. In this paper, we make a detailed study on $χ_{i}(G)$, $χ_{irc}(G)$ and its relation to other coloring and domination parameters

Hosoya index and Merrifield-Simmons index are two well-known topological descriptors that reflex some physical properties, boiling point or heat of formation for instance, of bezenoid hydrocarbon compounds. In this paper, we establish the generating functions of the expected values of these two indices of random hexagonal cacti. This generalizes the results of Doslic and Maloy, published in Discrete Mathemaics, in 2010. By applying the ideas on meromorphic functions and the growth of power series coefficients, the asymptotic behaviors of these indices on the random cacti have been established.

For a graph $G = (V(G), E(G))$, a dominating set $D$ is a vertex subset of $V(G)$ in which every vertex of $V(G) \setminus D$ is adjacent to a vertex in $D$. The domination number of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of $G$ and is denoted by $γ(G)$. A coloring of $G$ is a partition $C = (V_{1}, ... ,V_{k})$ such that each of $V_{i}$ in an independent set. The chromatic number is the smallest $k$ among all colorings $C = (V_{1}, ... ,V_{k})$ of $G$ and is denoted by $χ(G)$. A coloring $C = (V_{1}, ... ,V_{k})$ is said to be dominator if, for all $V_{i}$, every vertex $v \in V_{i}$ is singleton in $V_{i}$ or is adjacent to every vertex of $V_{j}$. The dominator chromatic number of $G$ is the minimum $k$ of all dominator colorings of $G$ and is denoted by $χ_{d}(G)$. Further, a graph $G$ is $D(k)$ if $γ(G) = χ(G) = χ_{d}(G) = k$. In this paper, for $n \geq 4k - 3$, we prove that there always exists a $D(k)$ graph of order $n$. We further prove that there is no planar $D(k)$ graph when $k \in \{3, 4\}$. Namely, we prove that, for a non-trivial planar graph $G$, the graph $G$ is $D(k)$ if and only if $G$ is $K_{2, q}$ where $q \geq 2$.

A dominating set of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a vertex set $D$ such that every vertex in $V(G) \setminus D$ is adjacent to a vertex in $D$. The cardinality of a smallest dominating set of $D$ is called the domination number of $G$ and is denoted by $γ(G)$. A vertex set $D$ is a $k$-isolating set of $G$ if $G - N_{G}[D]$ contains no $k$-cliques. The minimum cardinality of a $k$-isolating set of $G$ is called the $k$-isolation number of $G$ and is denoted by $ι_{k}(G)$. Clearly, $γ(G) = ι_{1}(G)$. A vertex set $I$ is irredundant if, for every non-isolated vertex $v$ of $G[I]$, there exists a vertex $u$ in $V \setminus I$ such that $N_{G}(u) \cap I = \{v\}$. An irredundant set $I$ is maximal if the set $I \cup \{u\}$ is no longer irredundant for any $u \in V(G) \setminus I$. The minimum cardinality of a maximal irredundant set is called the irredundance number of $G$ and is denoted by $ir(G)$. Allan and Laskar \cite{AL1978} and Bollobás and Cockayne \cite{BoCo1979} independently proved that $γ(G) < 2ir(G)$, which can be written $ι_1(G) < 2ir(G)$, for any graph $G$. In this paper, for a graph $G$ with maximum degree $Δ$, we establish sharp upper bounds on $ι_{k}(G)$ in terms of $ir(G)$ for $Δ- 2 \leq k \leq Δ+ 1$.

Counting the number of maximal independent sets of graphs was started over $50$ years ago by Erdős and Mooser. The problem has been continuously studied with a number of variations. Interestingly, when the maximal condition of an independent set is removed, such the concept presents one of topological indices in molecular graphs, the so called Merrifield-Simmons index. In this paper, we applied the concept of bivariate generating function to establish the recurrence relations of the numbers of maximal independent sets of regualr $n$-gonal cacti when $3 \leq n \leq 6$. By the ideas on meromorphic functions and the growth of power series coefficients, the asymptotic behaviors through simple functions of these recurrence relations have been established.

The angel game is played on $2$-dimensional infinite grid by $2$ players, the angel and the devil. In each turn, the angel of power $c \in \mathbb{N}$ moves from her current point $(x, y)$ to a point $(x', y')$ which $\max\{|x - x'|, |y - y'|\} \leq c$ while the devil chooses a point to destroy in his turn. Then, the angel can no longer land on these destroyed points. The angel wins if she has a strategy to escape from the devil forever and the devil wins if he can cage the angel in his destroyed points by a finite number of turns. It was proved in 2007 that the angel of power at least $2$ always wins. In this paper, we rise the problem when the angel is drunk. She randomly moves to any point in the range of her power in each turn. In our game version, the devil must cage the angel by a given finite number of turns, otherwise, the angel wins. We present a strategy for the devil that: if the devil plays with this strategy, then for given $c \in \mathbb{N}$ and $ε> 0$, the devil can cage the angel of power $c$ with probability greater than $1 - ε$ if and only if the game is played on an $n$-dimensional infinite grid when $n \leq 2$. We also establish the results related to the hitting time once the angel is first time outside an $n$-dimensional sphere of a given radius. The numerical simulation results are also presented in the last section.

For positive integers $n$ and $k$, the dendrimer $T_{n, k}$ is defined as the rooted tree of radius $n$ whose all vertices at distance less than $n$ from the root have degree $k$. The dendrimers are higly branched organic macromolecules having repeated iterations of branched units that surroundes the central core. Dendrimers are used in a variety of fields including chemistry, nanotechnology, biology. In this paper, for any positive integer $\ell$, we count the number of paths of length $\ell$ of $T_{n, k}$. As a consequence of our main results, we obtain the average distance of $T_{n, k}$ which we can establish an alternate proof for the Wiener index of $T_{n, k}$. Further, we generalize the concept of medium domination, introduced by Vargör and Dündar in 2011, of $T_{n, k}$.

A quasi-strongly regular graph of grade $p$ with parameters $(n, k, a; c_1, \ldots, c_p)$ is a $k$-regular graph of order $n$ such that any two adjacent vertices share $a$ common neighbours and any two non-adjacent vertices share $c_{i}$ common neighbours for some $1 \leq i \leq p$. This is a generalization of a strongly regular graph. In this paper, we focus on strictly quasi-strongly regular graphs of grade $3$ with $c_i = k - i$ for $i = 1, 2, 3$. The main result is to show the sharp bounds of order $n$ for a given $k \geq 4$. Furthermore, by this result, we characterize all of these graphs whose $n$ satisfies upper or lower bounds.

Several domination results have been obtained for maximal outerplanar graphs (mops). The classical domination problem is to minimize the size of a set $S$ of vertices of an $n$-vertex graph $G$ such that $G - N[S]$, the graph obtained by deleting the closed neighborhood of $S$, contains no vertices. In the proof of the Art Gallery Theorem, Chvátal showed that the minimum size, called the domination number of $G$ and denoted by $γ(G)$, is at most $n/3$ if $G$ is a mop. Here we consider a modification by allowing $G - N[S]$ to have a maximum degree of at most $k$. Let $ι_k(G)$ denote the size of a smallest set $S$ for which this is achieved. If $n \le 2k+3$, then trivially $ι_k(G) \leq 1$. Let $G$ be a mop on $n \ge \max\{5,2k+3\}$ vertices, $n_2$ of which are of degree $2$. Upper bounds on $ι_k(G)$ have been obtained for $k = 0$ and $k = 1$, namely $ι_{0}(G) \le \min\{\frac{n}{4},\frac{n+n_2}{5},\frac{n-n_2}{3}\}$ and $ι_1(G) \le \min\{\frac{n}{5},\frac{n+n_2}{6},\frac{n-n_2}{3}\}$. We prove that $ι_{k}(G) \le \min\{\frac{n}{k+4},\frac{n+n_2}{k+5},\frac{n-n_2}{k+2}\}$ for any $k \ge 0$. For the original setting of the Art Gallery Theorem, the argument presented yields that if an art gallery has exactly $n$ corners and at least one of every $k + 2$ consecutive corners must be visible to at least one guard, then the number of guards needed is at most $n/(k+4)$. We also prove that $γ(G) \le \frac{n - n_2}{2}$ unless $n = 2n_2$, $n_2$ is odd, and $γ(G) = \frac{n - n_2 + 1}{2}$. Together with the inequality $γ(G) \le \frac{n+n_2}{4}$, obtained by Campos and Wakabayashi and independently by Tokunaga, this improves Chvátal's bound. The bounds are sharp.

For a graph $G$, a vertex subset $S \subseteq V(G)$ is said to be $K_{k}$-isolating if $G - N_{G}[S]$ does not contain $K_{k}$ as a subgraph. The $K_{k}$-isolation number of $G$, denoted by $ι_{k}(G)$, is the minimum cardinality of a $K_{k}$-isolating set of $G$. Analogously, $S$ is said to be independent $K_{k}$-isolating if $S$ is a $K_{k}$-isolating set of $G$ and $G[S]$ has no edge. The independent $K_{k}$-isolation number of $G$, denoted by $ι'_{k}(G)$, is the minimum cardinality of an independent $K_{k}$-isolating set of $G$. Clearly, when $k = 1$, we have $γ(G) = ι_{1}(G)$ and $i(G) = ι'_{1}(G)$ where $γ(G)$ and $i(G)$ are the domination and independent domination numbers. For classic results between $γ(G)$ and $i(G)$, in 1978, Allan and Laskar proved that $γ(G) = i(G)$ for all $K_{1, 3}$-free graphs and this result was generalized to $K_{1, r}$-free graphs by Bollob$\acute{a}$s and Cockayne in 1979. In 2013, Rad and Volkmann proved that the ratio $i(G)/γ(G)$ is at most $Δ(G)/2$ when $Δ(G) \in \{3, 4, 5\}$. Further, Furuya et. al. proved that when $Δ(G) \geq 6$, we have $i(G)/γ(G) \leq Δ(G) - 2\sqrt{Δ(G)} + 2$. In this paper, for a smallest $K_{k}$-isolating set $S$, we prove that $ι'_k(G)\le -\frac{ι_k^2(G)}{\ell} +i_k(G)(Δ+2)-\ell Δ$ where $\ell$ is the number of some specific vertices of $S$ such that the union of their closed neighborhoods in $S$ is $S$. We prove that this bound is sharp. A special case of our main theorem implies $ι'_{k}(G)/ι_{k}(G) \leq Δ(G) - 2\sqrt{Δ(G)} + 2$. Further, we find an inequality between $ι'_{k}(G)$ and $ι_{k}(G)$ when $G$ is $K_{1, r}$-free graph. This also generalizes the result of Bollob$\acute{a}$s and Cockayne.

For a digraph $D$, the niche hypergraph $NH(D)$ of $D$ is the hypergraph having the same set of vertices as $D$ and the set of hyperedges is \begin{align} E(NH(D)) &= \{e \subseteq V(D) : |e| \geq 2~and~there~exists~v \in V(D)~such~that~e = N_{D}^{-}(v)\notag &~~~~~~~or~e = N_{D}^{+}(v)\}.\notag \end{align} A digraph is said to be acyclic if it has no directed cycle as a subdigraph. For a given hypergraph $H$, the niche number $\hat{n}(H)$ is the smallest integer such that $H$ together with $\hat{n}(H)$ isolated vertices is the niche hypergraph of an acyclic digraph. In this paper, we study the niche number of linear hypertrees with maximum degree two. By our result, we can conclude for a special case that if $H$ is a linear hypertree with $Δ(H) = 2$ and anti-rank three, then $\hat{n}(H) = 0$. We also prove that the maximum degree condition is best possible. Moreover, it was proved that if $H$ is a hypergraph of rank $r$ whose niche number is not infinity, then $Δ(H) \leq 2r$. In this paper, we give a construction of hypertrees whose niche number is $0$ of prescribed maximum degree from $3$ to $2r$.

For positive integers $n$ and $r$ such that $r \leq \lfloor n/2\rfloor$, let $X$ be a set of $n$ elements and let $\binom{X}{r}$ be the family of all $r$-subsets of $X$. Two sub-families $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ of $\binom{X}{r}$ are called cross intersecting if $A \cap B \neq \emptyset$ for all $A \in \mathcal{A}$ and $B \in \mathcal{B}$. One of main tools in the study of extremal set theory, and cross intersecting families in particular, is compression operation. In this paper, we give an example of cross intersecting families $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ that the compression operation is not applicable when $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ are disjoint. We develop new technique to prove that, for disjoint cross intersecting families $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ of $\binom{X}{r}$, $|\mathcal{A}| + |\mathcal{B}| \leq \binom{n}{r} - \binom{l}{p}$ where $n = 2r + l$ and $p = min\{r, \lceil \frac{l}{2}\rceil\}$. This bound is asymptotically sharp.

A graph $G$ is said to be $k$-$γ$-vertex critical if the domination numbers $γ(G)$ of $G$ is $k$ and $γ(G - v) < k$ for any vertex $v$ of $G$. Similarly, A graph $G$ is said to be $k$-$γ_{c}$-vertex critical if the connected domination numbers $γ_{c}(G)$ of $G$ is $k$ and $γ_{c}(G - v) < k$ for any vertex $v$ of $G$. The problem of interest is to determine whether or not $2$-connected $k$-$γ$-vertex critical graphs are Hamiltonian. In this paper, for all $k \geq 3$, we provide a $2$-connected $k$-$γ$-vertex critical graph which is non-Hamiltonian. We prove that every $2$-connected $3$-$γ$-vertex critical claw-free graph is Hamiltonian and the condition claw-free is necessary. For $k$-$γ_{c}$-vertex critical graphs, we present a new method to prove that every $2$-connected $3$-$γ_{c}$-vertex critical claw-free graph is Hamiltonian. Moreover, for $4 \leq k \leq 5$, we prove that every $3$-connected $k$-$γ_{c}$-vertex critical claw-free graph is Hamiltonian. We show that the condition claw-free is necessary by giving $k$-$γ_{c}$-vertex critical non-Hamiltonian graphs containing a claw as an induced subgraph for $3 \leq k \leq 5$.

A graph $G$ is said to be $k$-$γ_{c}$-critical if the connected domination number $γ_{c}(G)$ is equal to $k$ and $γ_{c}(G + uv) < k$ for any pair of non-adjacent vertices $u$ and $v$ of $G$. Let $ζ$ be the number of cut vertices of $G$ and let $ζ_{0}$ be the maximum number of cut vertices that can be contained in one block. For an integer $\ell \geq 0$, a graph $G$ is $\ell$-factor critical if $G - S$ has a perfect matching for any subset $S$ of vertices of size $\ell$. It was proved that, for $k \geq 3$, every $k$-$γ_{c}$-critical graph has at most $k - 2$ cut vertices and the graphs with maximum number of cut vertices were characterized. It was proved further that, for $k \geq 4$, every $k$-$γ_{c}$-critical graphs satisfies the inequality $ζ_{0}(G) \le \min \left\{ \left\lfloor \frac{k + 2}{3} \right\rfloor, ζ\right\}$. In this paper, we characterize all $k$-$γ_{c}$-critical graphs having $k - 3$ cut vertices. Further, we establish realizability that, for given $k \geq 4$, $2 \leq ζ\leq k - 2$ and $2 \leq ζ_{0} \le \min \left\{ \left\lfloor \frac{k + 2}{3} \right\rfloor, ζ\right\}$, there exists a $k$-$γ_{c}$-critical graph with $ζ$ cut vertices having a block which contains $ζ_{0}$ cut vertices. Finally, we proved that every $k$-$γ_{c}$-critical graph of odd order with minimum degree two is $1$-factor critical if and only if $1 \leq k \leq 2$. Further, we proved that every $k$-$γ_{c}$-critical $K_{1, 3}$-free graph of even order with minimum degree three is $2$-factor critical if and only if $1 \leq k \leq 2$.

A graph $G$ is said to be $k$-$γ_{c}$-critical if the connected domination number $γ_{c}(G) = k$ and $γ_{c}(G + uv) < k$ for every $uv \in E(\overline{G})$. Let $δ, κ$ and $α$ be respectively the minimum degree, the connectivity and the independence number. In this paper, we show that a $3$-$γ_{c}$-critical graph $G$ satisfies $α\leq κ+ 2$. Moreover, if $κ\geq 3$, then $α= κ+ p$ if and only if $α= δ+ p$ for all $p \in \{1, 2\}$. We show that the condition $κ+ 1 \leq α\leq κ+ 2$ is best possible to prove that $κ= δ$. By these result, we conclude our paper with an open problem on Hamiltonian connected of $3$-$γ_{c}$-critical graphs.

A dominating set in a graph $G$ is a set $S$ of vertices of $G$ such that every vertex outside $S$ is adjacent to a vertex in $S$. A connected dominating set in $G$ is a dominating set $S$ such that the subgraph $G[S]$ induced by $S$ is connected. The connected domination number of $G$, $γ_c(G)$, is the minimum cardinality of a connected dominating set of $G$. A graph $G$ is said to be $k$-$γ_{c}$-critical if the connected domination number $γ_{c}(G)$ is equal to $k$ and $γ_{c}(G + uv) < k$ for every pair of non-adjacent vertices $u$ and $v$ of $G$. Let $ζ$ be the number of cut-vertices of $G$. It is known that if $G$ is a $k$-$γ_{c}$-critical graph, then $G$ has at most $k - 2$ cut-vertices, that is $ζ\le k - 2$. In this paper, for $k \ge 4$ and $0 \le ζ\le k - 2$, we show that every $k$-$γ_{c}$-critical graph with $ζ$ cut-vertices has a hamiltonian path if and only if $k - 3 \le ζ\le k - 2$.

A $k$-$γ_{c}$-edge critical graph is a graph $G$ with the connected domination number $γ_{c}(G) = k$ and $γ_{c}(G + uv) < k$ for every $uv \in E(\overline{G})$. Further, a $2$-connected graph $G$ is said to be $k$-$γ_{c}$-vertex critical if $γ_{c}(G) = k$ and $γ_{c}(G - v) < k$ for all $v \in V(G)$. A maximal $k$-$γ_{c}$-vertex critical graph is a graph which are both $k$-$γ_{c}$-edge critical and $k$-$γ_{c}$-vertex critical. Let $κ, δ, ω$ and $α$ be respectively connectivity minimum degree, clique number and independence number. In this paper, we prove that every maximal $3$-$γ_{c}$-vertex critical graph $G$ satisfies $α\leq δ$ and this bound is best possible. We prove further that $G$ satisfies $α+ ω\leq n - 1$ and we also characterize all such graphs achieving the upper bounds. We finally show that if $G$ satisfies $κ< δ$, then every two vertices of $G$ are joined by hamiltonian path.

Several domination results have been obtained for maximal outerplanar graphs (mops). The classical domination problem is to minimize the size of a set $S$ of vertices of an $n$-vertex graph $G$ such that $G - N[S]$, the graph obtained by deleting the closed neighborhood of $S$, is null. A classical result of Chvátal is that the minimum size is at most $n/3$ if $G$ is a mop. Here we consider a modification by allowing $G - N[S]$ to have isolated vertices and isolated edges only. Let $ι_1(G)$ denote the size of a smallest set $S$ for which this is achieved. We show that if $G$ is a mop on $n \geq 5$ vertices, then $ι_{1}(G) \leq n/5$. We also show that if $n_2$ is the number of vertices of degree $2$, then $ι_{1}(G) \leq \frac{n+n_2}{6}$ if $n_2 \leq \frac{n}{3}$, and $ι_1(G) \leq \frac{n-n_2}{3}$ otherwise. We show that these bounds are best possible.

For any positive integer $k$ and any $n$-vertex graph $G$, let $ι(G,k)$ denote the size of a smallest set $D$ of vertices of $G$ such that the graph obtained from $G$ by deleting the closed neighbourhood of $D$ contains no $k$-clique. Thus, $ι(G,1)$ is the domination number of $G$. We prove that if $G$ is connected, then $ι(G,k) \leq \frac{n}{k+1}$ unless $G$ is a $k$-clique or $k = 2$ and $G$ is a $5$-cycle. The bound is sharp. The case $k=1$ is a classical result of Ore, and the case $k=2$ is a recent result of Caro and Hansberg. Our result solves a problem of Caro and Hansberg.