arXiv++ Combinatorics

For any positive integer $k$ and any $n$-vertex graph $G$, let $ι(G,k)$ denote the size of a smallest set $D$ of vertices of $G$ such that the graph obtained from $G$ by deleting the closed neighbourhood of $D$ contains no $k$-clique. Thus, $ι(G,1)$ is the domination number of $G$. We prove that if $G$ is connected, then $ι(G,k) \leq \frac{n}{k+1}$ unless $G$ is a $k$-clique or $k = 2$ and $G$ is a $5$-cycle. The bound is sharp. The case $k=1$ is a classical result of Ore, and the case $k=2$ is a recent result of Caro and Hansberg. Our result solves a problem of Caro and Hansberg.

For any graph $G$, let $ι_{\rm c}(G)$ denote the size of a smallest set $D$ of vertices of $G$ such that the graph obtained from $G$ by deleting the closed neighbourhood of $D$ contains no cycle. We prove that if $G$ is a connected $n$-vertex graph that is not a triangle, then $ι_{\rm c}(G) \leq n/4$. We also show that the bound is sharp. Consequently, we solve a problem of Caro and Hansberg.

A set $A$ $t$-intersects a set $B$ if $A$ and $B$ have at least $t$ common elements. A set of sets is called a family. Two families $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ are cross-$t$-intersecting if each set in $\mathcal{A}$ $t$-intersects each set in $\mathcal{B}$. A family $\mathcal{H}$ is hereditary if for each set $A$ in $\mathcal{H}$, all the subsets of $A$ are in $\mathcal{H}$. The $r$th level of $\mathcal{H}$, denoted by $\mathcal{H}^{(r)}$, is the family of $r$-element sets in $\mathcal{H}$. A set $B$ in $\mathcal{H}$ is a base of $\mathcal{H}$ if for each set $A$ in $\mathcal{H}$, $B$ is not a proper subset of $A$. Let $μ(\mathcal{H})$ denote the size of a smallest base of $\mathcal{H}$. We show that for any integers $t$, $r$, and $s$ with $1 \leq t \leq r \leq s$, there exists an integer $c(r,s,t)$ such that the following holds for any hereditary family $\mathcal{H}$ with $μ(\mathcal{H}) \geq c(r,s,t)$. If $\mathcal{A}$ is a non-empty subfamily of $\mathcal{H}^{(r)}$, $\mathcal{B}$ is a non-empty subfamily of $\mathcal{H}^{(s)}$, $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ are cross-$t$-intersecting, and $|\mathcal{A}| + |\mathcal{B}|$ is maximum under the given conditions, then for some set $I$ in $\mathcal{H}$ with $t \leq |I| \leq r$, either $\mathcal{A} = \{A \in \mathcal{H}^{(r)} \colon I \subseteq A\}$ and $\mathcal{B} = \{B \in \mathcal{H}^{(s)} \colon |B \cap I| \geq t\}$, or $r = s$, $t < |I|$, $\mathcal{A} = \{A \in \mathcal{H}^{(r)} \colon |A \cap I| \geq t\}$, and $\mathcal{B} = \{B \in \mathcal{H}^{(s)} \colon I \subseteq B\}$. This was conjectured by the author for $t=1$ and generalizes well-known results for the case where $\mathcal{H}$ is a power set.

A set $A$ $t$-intersects a set $B$ if $A$ and $B$ have at least $t$ common elements. Families $\mathcal{A}_1, \mathcal{A}_2, \dots, \mathcal{A}_k$ of sets are cross-$t$-intersecting if, for every $i$ and $j$ in $\{1, 2, \dots, k\}$ with $i \neq j$, each set in $\mathcal{A}_i$ $t$-intersects each set in $\mathcal{A}_j$. An active problem in extremal set theory is to determine, for a given finite family $\mathcal{F}$, the structure of $k$ cross-$t$-intersecting subfamilies whose sum or product of sizes is maximum. For a family $\mathcal{H}$, the $r$-th level $\mathcal{H}^{(r)}$ of $\mathcal{H}$ is the family of all sets in $\mathcal{H}$ of size $r$, and, for $s \leq r$, $\mathcal{H}^{(s)}$ is called a $(\leq r)$-level of $\mathcal{H}$. We solve the problem for any union $\mathcal{F}$ of $(\leq r)$-levels of any union $\mathcal{H}$ of power sets of sets of size at least a certain integer $n_0$, where $n_0$ is independent of $\mathcal{H}$ and $k$ but depends on $r$ and $t$ (dependence on $r$ is inevitable, but dependence on $t$ can be avoided). Our primary result asserts that there are only two possible optimal configurations for the sum. A special case was conjectured by Kamat in 2011. We also prove generalizations, whereby $\mathcal{A}_1, \mathcal{A}_2, \dots, \mathcal{A}_k$ are not necessarily contained in the same union of levels. Various Erdős-Ko-Rado-type results follow. The sum problem for a level of a power set was solved for $t=1$ by Hilton in 1977, and for any $t$ by Wang and Zhang in 2011.

If $A$ is an independent set of a graph $G$ such that the vertices in $A$ have different degrees, then we call $A$ an irregular independent set of $G$. If $D$ is a dominating set of $G$ such that the vertices that are not in $D$ have different numbers of neighbours in $D$, then we call $D$ an irregular dominating set of $G$. The size of a largest irregular independent set of $G$ and the size of a smallest irregular dominating set of $G$ are denoted by $α_{ir}(G)$ and $γ_{ir}(G)$, respectively. We initiate the investigation of these two graph parameters. For each of them, we obtain sharp bounds in terms of basic graph parameters such as the order, the size, the minimum degree and the maximum degree, and we obtain Nordhaus-Gaddum-type bounds. We also establish sharp bounds relating the two parameters. Furthermore, we characterize the graphs $G$ with $α_{ir}(G)=1$, we determine those that are planar, and we determine those that are outerplanar.

A family $\mathcal{A}$ of sets is said to be intersecting if every two sets in $\mathcal{A}$ intersect. Two families $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ are said to be cross-intersecting if each set in $\mathcal{A}$ intersects each set in $\mathcal{B}$. For a positive integer $n$, let $[n] = \{1, \dots, n\}$ and $\mathcal{S}_n = \{A \subseteq [n] \colon 1 \in A\}$. In this note, we extend the Erdős-Ko-Rado Theorem by showing that if $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ are non-empty cross-intersecting families of subsets of $[n]$, $\mathcal{A}$ is intersecting, and $a_0, a_1, \dots, a_n, b_0, b_1, \dots, b_n$ are non-negative real numbers such that $a_i + b_i \geq a_{n-i} + b_{n-i}$ and $a_{n-i} \geq b_i$ for each $i \leq n/2$, then \[\sum_{A \in \mathcal{A}} a_{|A|} + \sum_{B \in \mathcal{B}} b_{|B|} \leq \sum_{A \in \mathcal{S}_n} a_{|A|} + \sum_{B \in \mathcal{S}_n} b_{|B|}.\] For a graph $G$ and an integer $r$, let ${\mathcal{I}_G}^{(r)}$ denote the family of $r$-element independent sets of $G$. Inspired by a problem of Holroyd and Talbot, Feghali, Johnson and Thomas conjectured that if $r < n$ and $G$ is a depth-two claw with $n$ leaves, then $G$ has a vertex $v$ such that $\{A \in {\mathcal{I}_G}^{(r)} \colon v \in A\}$ is a largest intersecting subfamily of ${\mathcal{I}_G}^{(r)}$. They proved this for $r \leq \frac{n+1}{2}$. We use the result above to prove the full conjecture.

We say that a set $A$ $t$-intersects a set $B$ if $A$ and $B$ have at least $t$ common elements. Two families $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ of sets are said to be cross-$t$-intersecting if each set in $\mathcal{A}$ $t$-intersects each set in $\mathcal{B}$. A subfamily $\mathcal{S}$ of a family $\mathcal{F}$ is called a $t$-star of $\mathcal{F}$ if the sets in $\mathcal{S}$ have $t$ common elements. Let $l(\mathcal{F},t)$ denote the size of a largest $t$-star of $\mathcal{F}$. We call $\mathcal{F}$ a $(\leq r)$-family if each set in $\mathcal{F}$ has at most $r$ elements. We determine a function $c : \mathbb{N}^3 \rightarrow \mathbb{N}$ such that the following holds. If $\mathcal{A}$ is a subfamily of a $(\leq r)$-family $\mathcal{F}$ with $l(\mathcal{F},t) \geq c(r,s,t)l(\mathcal{F},t+1)$, $\mathcal{B}$ is a subfamily of a $(\leq s)$-family $\mathcal{G}$ with $l(\mathcal{G},t) \geq c(r,s,t)l(\mathcal{G},t+1)$, and $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ are cross-$t$-intersecting, then $|\mathcal{A}||\mathcal{B}| \leq l(\mathcal{F},t)l(\mathcal{G},t)$. Some known results follow from this, and we identify several natural classes of families for which the bound is attained.

For a positive integer $r$ and a vertex $v$ of a graph $G$, let $\mathcal{I}_G^{(r)}(v)$ denote the set of all independent sets of $G$ that have exactly $r$ elements and contain $v$. Hurlbert and Kamat conjectured that for any $r$ and any tree $T$, there exists a leaf $z$ of $T$ such that $|\mathcal{I}_T^{(r)}(v)| \leq |\mathcal{I}_T^{(r)}(z)|$ for each vertex $v$ of $T$. They proved the conjecture for $r \leq 4$. For any $k \geq 3$, we construct a tree $T_k$ that has a vertex $x$ such that $x$ is not a leaf of $T_k$, $|\mathcal{I}_{T_k}^{(r)}(z)| < |\mathcal{I}_{T_k}^{(r)}(x)|$ for any leaf $z$ of $T_k$ and any $5 \leq r \leq 2k+1$, and $2k+1$ is the largest integer $s$ for which $\mathcal{I}_{T_k}^{(s)}(x)$ is non-empty. Therefore, the conjecture is not true for $r \geq 5$.

Two families $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ of sets are said to be cross-$t$-intersecting if each set in $\mathcal{A}$ intersects each set in $\mathcal{B}$ in at least $t$ elements. An active problem in extremal set theory is to determine the maximum product of sizes of cross-$t$-intersecting subfamilies of a given family. We prove a cross-$t$-intersection theorem for weighted subsets of a set by means of a new subfamily alteration method, and use the result to provide solutions for three natural families. For $r\in[n]=\{1,2,\dots,n\}$, let ${[n]\choose r}$ be the family of $r$-element subsets of $[n]$, and let ${[n]\choose\leq r}$ be the family of subsets of $[n]$ that have at most $r$ elements. Let $\mathcal{F}_{n,r,t}$ be the family of sets in ${[n]\choose\leq r}$ that contain $[t]$. We show that if $g:{[m]\choose\leq r}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^+$ and $h:{[n]\choose\leq s}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^+$ are functions that obey certain conditions, $\mathcal{A}\subseteq{[m]\choose\leq r}$, $\mathcal{B}\subseteq{[n]\choose\leq s}$, and $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ are cross-$t$-intersecting, then \[\sum_{A\in\mathcal{A}}g(A)\sum_{B\in\mathcal{B}}h(B)\leq\sum_{C\in\mathcal{F}_{m,r,t}}g(C)\sum_{D\in\mathcal{F}_{n,s,t}}h(D),\] and equality holds if $\mathcal{A}=\mathcal{F}_{m,r,t}$ and $\mathcal{B}=\mathcal{F}_{n,s,t}$. We prove this in a more general setting and characterise the cases of equality. We use the result to show that the maximum product of sizes of two cross-$t$-intersecting families $\mathcal{A}\subseteq{[m]\choose r}$ and $\mathcal{B}\subseteq{[n]\choose s}$ is ${m-t\choose r-t}{n-t\choose s-t}$ for $\min\{m,n\}\geq n_0(r,s,t)$, where $n_0(r,s,t)$ is close to best possible. We obtain analogous results for families of integer sequences and for families of multisets. The results yield generalisations for $k\geq2$ cross-$t$-intersecting families, and Erdos-Ko-Rado-type results.

For any positive integers $k,r,n$ with $r \leq \min\{k,n\}$, let $\mathcal{P}_{k,r,n}$ be the family of all sets $\{(x_1,y_1), \dots, (x_r,y_r)\}$ such that $x_1, \dots, x_r$ are distinct elements of $[k] = \{1, \dots, k\}$ and $y_1, \dots, y_r$ are distinct elements of $[n]$. The families $\mathcal{P}_{n,n,n}$ and $\mathcal{P}_{n,r,n}$ describe permutations of $[n]$ and $r$-partial permutations of $[n]$, respectively. If $k \leq n$, then $\mathcal{P}_{k,k,n}$ describes permutations of $k$-element subsets of $[n]$. A family $\mathcal{A}$ of sets is said to be intersecting if every two members of $\mathcal{A}$ intersect. In this note we use Katona's elegant cycle method to show that a number of important Erdős-Ko-Rado-type results by various authors generalise as follows: the size of any intersecting subfamily $\mathcal{A}$ of $\mathcal{P}_{k,r,n}$ is at most ${k-1 \choose r-1}\frac{(n-1)!}{(n-r)!}$, and the bound is attained if and only if $\mathcal{A} = \{A \in \mathcal{P}_{k,r,n} \colon (a,b) \in A\}$ for some $a \in [k]$ and $b \in [n]$.

Two families $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ of sets are said to be cross-intersecting if each member of $\mathcal{A}$ intersects each member of $\mathcal{B}$. For any two integers $n$ and $k$ with $0 \leq k \leq n$, let ${[n] \choose \leq k}$ denote the family of all subsets of $\{1, \dots, n\}$ of size at most $k$. We show that if $\mathcal{A} \subseteq {[m] \choose \leq r}$, $\mathcal{B} \subseteq {[n] \choose \leq s}$, and $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ are cross-intersecting, then \[|\mathcal{A}||\mathcal{B}| \leq \sum_{i=0}^r {m-1 \choose i-1} \sum_{j=0}^s {n-1 \choose j-1},\] and equality holds if $\mathcal{A} = \{A \in {[m] \choose \leq r} \colon 1 \in A\}$ and $\mathcal{B} = \{B \in {[n] \choose \leq s} \colon 1 \in B\}$. Also, we generalise this to any number of such cross-intersecting families.

We say that a set $A$ \emph{$t$-intersects} a set $B$ if $A$ and $B$ have at least $t$ common elements. Two families $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ are said to be \emph{cross-$t$-intersecting} if each set in $\mathcal{A}$ $t$-intersects each set in $\mathcal{B}$. For any positive integers $n$ and $r$, let ${[n] \choose r}$ denote the family of all $r$-element subsets of $\{1,2,\dots, n\}$. We show that for any integers $r$, $s$ and $t$ with $1 \leq t \leq r \leq s$, there exists an integer $n_0(r,s,t)$ such that for any integer $n \geq n_0(r,s,t)$, if $\mathcal{A} \subset {[n] \choose r}$ and $\mathcal{B} \subset {[n] \choose s}$ such that $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ are cross-$t$-intersecting, then $|\mathcal{A}||\mathcal{B}| \leq {n-t \choose r-t}{n-t \choose s-t}$, and equality holds if and only if for some $T \in {[n] \choose t}$, $\mathcal{A} = \{A \in {[n] \choose r} \colon T \subset A\}$ and $\mathcal{B} = \{B \in {[n] \choose s} \colon T \subset B\}$. This verifies a conjecture of Hirschorn.

If $a_1, a_2, ..., a_k$ and $n$ are positive integers such that $n = a_1 + a_2 + ... + a_k$, then the sum $a_1 + a_2 + ... + a_k$ is said to be a \emph{partition of $n$} of \emph{length $k$}, and $a_1, a_2, ..., a_k$ are said to be the \emph{parts} of the partition. Two partitions that differ only in the order of their parts are considered to be the same. We say that two partitions \emph{intersect} if they have at least one common part. We call a set $A$ of partitions \emph{intersecting} if any two partitions in $A$ intersect. Let $P_{n,k}$ be the set of all partitions of $n$ of length $k$. We conjecture that if $2 \leq k \leq n$, then the size of any intersecting subset of $P_{n,k}$ is at most the size of $P_{n-1,k-1}$, which is the size of the intersecting subset of $P_{n,k}$ consisting of those partitions which have 1 as a part. The conjecture is trivially true for $n \leq 2k$, and we prove it for $n \geq 5k^5$. We also generalise this for subsets of $P_{n,k}$ with the property that any two of their members have at least $t$ common parts.

We call $(a_1, \dots, a_n)$ an \emph{$r$-partial sequence} if exactly $r$ of its entries are positive integers and the rest are all zero. For ${\bf c} = (c_1, \dots, c_n)$ with $1 \leq c_1 \leq \dots \leq c_n$, let $S_{\bf c}^{(r)}$ be the set of $r$-partial sequences $(a_1, \dots, a_n)$ with $0 \leq a_i \leq c_i$ for each $i$ in $\{1, \dots, n\}$, and let $S_{\bf c}^{(r)}(1)$ be the set of members of $S_{\bf c}^{(r)}$ which have $a_1 = 1$. We say that $(a_1, \dots, a_n)$ \emph{meets} $(b_1, \dots, b_m)$ if $a_i = b_i \neq 0$ for some $i$. Two sets $A$ and $B$ of sequences are said to be \emph{cross-intersecting} if each sequence in $A$ meets each sequence in $B$. Let ${\bf d} = (d_1, \dots, d_m)$ with $1 \leq d_1 \leq \dots \leq d_m$. Let $A \subseteq S_{\bf c}^{(r)}$ and $B \subseteq S_{\bf d}^{(s)}$ such that $A$ and $B$ are cross-intersecting. We show that $|A||B| \leq |S_{\bf c}^{(r)}(1)||S_{\bf d}^{(s)}(1)|$ if either $c_1 \geq 3$ and $d_1 \geq 3$ or ${\bf c} = {\bf d}$ and $r = s = n$. We also determine the cases of equality. We obtain this by proving a general cross-intersection theorem for \emph{weighted} sets. The bound generalises to one for $k \geq 2$ cross-intersecting sets.

A family $\mathcal{A}$ of sets is said to be \emph{$t$-intersecting} if any two sets in $\mathcal{A}$ have at least $t$ common elements. A central problem in extremal set theory is to determine the size or structure of a largest $t$-intersecting sub-family of a given family $\mathcal{F}$. We give a survey of known results, conjectures and open problems for various important families $\mathcal{F}$, namely, power sets, levels of power sets, hereditary families, families of signed sets, families of labeled sets, and families of permutations. We also provide some extensions and consequences of known results.

Families $\mathcal{A}_1, \mathcal{A}_2, ..., \mathcal{A}_k$ of sets are said to be \emph{cross-intersecting} if for any $i$ and $j$ in $\{1, 2, ..., k\}$ with $i \neq j$, any set in $\mathcal{A}_i$ intersects any set in $\mathcal{A}_j$. For a finite set $X$, let $2^X$ denote the \emph{power set of $X$} (the family of all subsets of $X$). A family $\mathcal{H}$ is said to be \emph{hereditary} if all subsets of any set in $\mathcal{H}$ are in $\mathcal{H}$; so $\mathcal{H}$ is hereditary if and only if it is a union of power sets. We conjecture that for any non-empty hereditary sub-family $\mathcal{H} \neq \{\emptyset\}$ of $2^X$ and any $k \geq |X|+1$, both the sum and product of sizes of $k$ cross-intersecting sub-families $\mathcal{A}_1, \mathcal{A}_2, ..., \mathcal{A}_k$ (not necessarily distinct or non-empty) of $\mathcal{H}$ are maxima if $\mathcal{A}_1 = \mathcal{A}_2 = ... = \mathcal{A}_k = \mathcal{S}$ for some largest \emph{star $\mathcal{S}$ of $\mathcal{H}$} (a sub-family of $\mathcal{H}$ whose sets have a common element). We prove this for the case when $\mathcal{H}$ is \emph{compressed with respect to an element $x$ of $X$}, and for this purpose we establish new properties of the usual \emph{compression operation}. For the product, we actually conjecture that the configuration $\mathcal{A}_1 = \mathcal{A}_2 = ... = \mathcal{A}_k = \mathcal{S}$ is optimal for any hereditary $\mathcal{H}$ and any $k \geq 2$, and we prove this for a special case too.

We say that a set $A$ \emph{$t$-intersects} a set $B$ if $A$ and $B$ have at least $t$ common elements. A family $\mathcal{A}$ of sets is said to be \emph{$t$-intersecting} if each set in $\mathcal{A}$ $t$-intersects any other set in $\mathcal{A}$. Families $\mathcal{A}_1, \mathcal{A}_2, ..., \mathcal{A}_k$ are said to be \emph{cross-$t$-intersecting} if for any $i$ and $j$ in $\{1, 2, ..., k\}$ with $i \neq j$, any set in $\mathcal{A}_i$ $t$-intersects any set in $\mathcal{A}_j$. We prove that for any finite family $\mathcal{F}$ that has at least one set of size at least $t$, there exists an integer $κ\leq |\mathcal{F}|$ such that for any $k \geq κ$, both the sum and the product of sizes of any $k$ cross-$t$-intersecting sub-families $\mathcal{A}_1, ..., \mathcal{A}_k$ (not necessarily distinct or non-empty) of $\mathcal{F}$ are maxima if $\mathcal{A}_1 = ... = \mathcal{A}_k = \mathcal{L}$ for some largest $t$-intersecting sub-family $\mathcal{L}$ of $\mathcal{F}$. We then study the smallest possible value of $κ$ and investigate the case $k < κ$; this includes a cross-intersection result for straight lines that demonstrates that it is possible to have $\mathcal{F}$ and $κ$ such that for any $k < κ$, the configuration $\mathcal{A}_1 = ... = \mathcal{A}_k = \mathcal{L}$ is neither optimal for the sum nor optimal for the product. We also outline solutions for various important families $\mathcal{F}$, and we provide solutions for the case when $\mathcal{F}$ is a power set.

An $r$-graph $G$ is a pair $(V,E)$ such that $V$ is a set and $E$ is a family of $r$-element subsets of $V$. The \emph{independence number} $α(G)$ of $G$ is the size of a largest subset $I$ of $V$ such that no member of $E$ is a subset of $I$. The \emph{transversal number} $τ(G)$ of $G$ is the size of a smallest subset $T$ of $V$ that intersects each member of $E$. $G$ is said to be \emph{connected} if for every distinct $v$ and $w$ in $V$ there exists a \emph{path} from $v$ to $w$ (that is, a sequence $e_1, \dots, e_p$ of members of $E$ such that $v \in e_1$, $w \in e_p$, and if $p \geq 2$, then for each $i \in \{1, \dots, p-1\}$, $e_i$ intersects $e_{i+1}$). The \emph{degree} of a member $v$ of $V$ is the number of members of $E$ that contain $v$. The maximum of the degrees of the members of $V$ is denoted by $Δ(G)$. We show that for any $1 \leq k < n$, if $G = (V,E)$ is a connected $r$-graph, $|V| = n$, and $Δ(G) = k$, then \[α(G) \leq n - \left \lceil \frac{n-1}{k(r-1)} \right \rceil, \quad τ(G) \geq \left \lceil \frac{n-1}{k(r-1)} \right \rceil,\] and these bounds are sharp. The two bounds are equivalent.