Papers by Radosław Ziemann
4 paper(s) by this author
· All BibTeX
Isolation subdivision number of a graph
For a graph $G=(V,E),$ a set $S \subseteq V$ is called an isolating set of $G$ if the set $V-N[S]$ is independent. The minimum cardinality of an isolating set in $G$ is the isolation number of $G$, denoted by $ι(G).$ Here we introduce the isolation subdivision number of a graph $G$, denoted by ${\rm sd}_ι(G)$, as the minimum number of edges of $G$ that must be subdivided, where each edge can be subdivided at most once, in order to obtain a graph with isolation number greater than $ι(G).$ We show that the new parameter is well defined for any non-trivial graph different from a star and that it can be arbitrarily large. We present the values of this parameter for some elementary classes of graphs and establish some basic properties. We show also that $1\leq {\rm sd}_ι(T)\leq 4$ for any tree $T$ different from a star and characterize all trees $T$ with ${\rm sd}_ι(T)=1.$
A new approach to b-coloring of regular graphs
Let $G$ be a graph and c a proper k-coloring of G, i.e. any two adjacent vertices u and v have different colors c(u) and c(v). A proper k-coloring is a b-coloring if there exists a vertex in every color class that contains all the colors in its closed neighborhood. The maximum number of colors k admitting b-coloring of G is the b-chromatic number. We present two separate approaches to the conjecture posed by Blidia et. al that the b-chromatic number equals to d+1 for every d-regular graph of girth at least five except the Petersen graph.
Graphs with equal domination and certified domination numbers
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
A set $D$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is a dominating set of $G$ if every vertex in $V_G-D$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in $D$. The domination number (upper domination number, respectively) of a graph $G$, denoted by $γ(G)$ ($Γ(G)$, respectively), is the cardinality of a smallest (largest minimal, respectively) dominating set of $G$. A subset $D\subseteq V_G$ is called a certified dominating set of $G$ if $D$ is a dominating set of $G$ and every vertex in $D$ has either zero or at least two neighbors in $V_G-D$. The cardinality of a~smallest (largest minimal, respectively) certified dominating set of $G$ is called the certified upper certified, respectively domination number of $G$ and is denoted by $γ_{\rm cer}(G)$ ($Γ_{\rm cer}(G)$, respectively). In this paper relations between domination, upper domination, certified domination and upper certified domination numbers of a graph are studied.
Certified domination
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
Imagine that we are given a set $D$ of officials and a set $W$ of civils. For each civil $x \in W$, there must be an official $v \in D$ that can serve $x$, and whenever any such $v$ is serving $x$, there must also be another civil $w \in W$ that observes $v$, that is, $w$ may act as a kind of witness, to avoid any abuse from $v$. What is the minimum number of officials to guarantee such a service, assuming a given social network?
In this paper, we introduce the concept of certified domination that perfectly models the aforementioned problem. Specifically, a dominating set $D$ of a graph $G=(V_G,E_G)$ is said to be certified if every vertex in $D$ has either zero or at least two neighbours in $V_G\setminus D$. The cardinality of a minimum certified dominating set in $G$ is called the certified domination number of $G$. Herein, we present the exact values of the certified domination number for some classes of graphs as well as provide some upper bounds on this parameter for arbitrary graphs. We then characterise a wide class of graphs with equal domination and certified domination numbers and characterise graphs with large values of certified domination numbers. Next, we examine the effects on the certified domination number when the graph is modified by deleting/adding an edge or a vertex. We also provide Nordhaus-Gaddum type inequalities for the certified domination number. Finally, we show that the (decision) certified domination problem is NP-complete.