arXiv++ Combinatorics

We address the question of whether it may be worthwhile to convert certain, now classical, NP-complete problems to one of a smaller number of kernel NP-complete problems. In particular, we show that Karp's classical set of 21 NP-complete problems contains a kernel subset of six problems with the property that each problem in the larger set can be converted to one of these six problems with only linear growth in problem size. This finding has potential applications in optimisation theory because the kernel subset includes 0-1 integer programming, job sequencing and undirected Hamiltonian cycle problems.

For any given $ε>0$ we provide an algorithm for the Densest $k$-Subhypergraph Problem with an approximation ratio of at most $O(n^{θ_m+2ε})$ for $θ_m=\frac{1}{2}m-\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{2m}$ and run time at most $O(n^{m-2+1/ε})$, where the hyperedges have at most $m$ vertices. We use this result to give an algorithm for the Set Union Knapsack Problem with an approximation ratio of at most $O(n^{α_m+ε})$ for $α_m=\frac{2}{3}[m-1-\frac{2m-2}{m^2+m-1}]$ and run time at most $O(n^{5(m-2)+9/ε})$, where the subsets have at most $m$ elements. The author is not aware of any previous results on the approximation of either of these two problems.

For any given $ε>0$ we provide an algorithm for the Quadratic Knapsack Problem that has an approximation ratio within $O(n^{2/5+ε})$ and a run time within $O(n^{9/ε})$.