arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Rigobert Fokam Souop

2 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
2026-09-01 v2
Induced Embeddings of Graphs into Abelian Cayley Graphs
For a finite graph $G$ on $n$ vertices, let $η(G)$ denote the least order of a finite abelian group $Γ$ for which $G$ is an induced subgraph of some Cayley graph of $Γ$. Babai and Sós (1985) settled the worst-case order of magnitude: it is $Θ(n^2)$. We treat $η$ instead as an invariant of the individual graph, minimised over all finite abelian groups rather than over the cyclic groups alone, which is the restriction implicit in the literature on representation numbers modulo $n$. We prove a local order floor: $η(G)$ is at least the maximum of $n$ and twice the largest independence number of a neighbourhood of $G$. This localises at an arbitrary vertex the correspondence of Babai and Sós between induced stars and sum-free sets; a corollary of the classification of maximum sum-free sets in abelian groups does not lower this floor, but restricts which host orders are admissible and so prunes the search. We determine $η$ exactly for paths, where it equals $n+1$, and for complete bipartite graphs $K_{a,b}$, where it equals $2\max(a,b)$ and meets the floor. A Cartesian product bound gives $η(P_m \,\square\, P_m) = (1+o(1))n$. We report certified exact values of $η$ for $22$ graphs, computed over all abelian groups. Seventeen of the $22$ optimal hosts are cyclic, so on most of these graphs the cyclic restriction costs nothing; where it bites, however, it is expensive. A search restricted to cyclic groups returns $36$ for the Petersen graph against the true value $16$, and $59$ for the Frucht graph against $27$. The cost of the restriction is concentrated rather than diffuse, and we identify the graphs on which it is paid. We also determine $η$ exactly for the double stars $D_{q,q}$ with $2 \le q \le 6$, obtaining $5q$ in each case. Since $η(D_{6,6}) = 30$ exceeds $2n = 28$, no constant below $15/7$ can bound $η(T)/n$ over all trees.
2026-08-31
The Cayley Completion of a Graph
A finite connected graph is rarely a Cayley graph. We measure how far it is from being one: given $G$ with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges, how few edges must be added, or added and deleted, before the result is a Cayley graph of an abelian group of order $n$ on the same vertex set? This defines two invariants, the completion number $γ^{+}$ (additions only) and the Cayley edit distance $γ_{\triangle}$ (both), each normalized by $m$. We show that deciding the edit version is NP-complete already for a fixed cyclic host, by a reduction from Hamiltonian Cycle in which the edit cost of a labeling is $n+m-2k$ when it realizes a longest path with $k$ edges; the optimal cost is $m-n+2pp(G)$, bounded in polynomial time by the matching number. We prove that irregularity alone forces $γ^{+}(G)\ge nΔ^{*}/(2m)-1$, where $Δ^{*}$ is the least $d\geΔ$ with $nd$ even, computable in linear time from the degree sequence; we characterize equality exactly. It is attained on the star, where $γ^{+}(K_{1,q})=(q-1)/2$ and the star maximizes $γ^{+}$, while $γ_{\triangle}$ stays bounded by an absolute constant. We determine paths and grids exactly, $γ^{+}(P_n)=γ^{+}(P_n\,\square\,P_n)=1/(n-1)$, and show $γ_{\triangle}(K_{1,q})\to 2$, not the $3/2$ suggested by the additive case. We report an exhaustive certified census of all $995$ connected graphs on at most seven vertices. The degree bound is attained on $89.4\%$ and the two invariants separate strictly on $84.7\%$, though both rates vary sharply with order: attainment $100\%,100\%,84.8\%,89.7\%$ and separation $0\%,61.9\%,73.2\%,87.7\%$ for $n=4,5,6,7$, dominated by the $853$ graphs on seven vertices. The star uniquely maximizes both. Edit count and the bi-Lipschitz distortion of the completed host are independent, moving oppositely on stars and paths.Data and certificates at doi:10.5281/zenodo.21852006.