arXiv++ Combinatorics

We consider the problem of recovering an unknown matching between a set of $n$ randomly placed points in $\mathbb{R}^d$ and random perturbations of these points. This can be seen as a model for particle tracking and more generally, entity resolution. We use matchings in random geometric graphs to derive minimax lower bounds for this problem that hold under great generality. Using these results we show that for a broad class of distributions, the order of the number of mistakes made by an estimator that minimizes the sum of squared Euclidean distances is minimax optimal when $d$ is fixed and is optimal up to $n^{o(1)}$ factors when $d = o(\log n)$. In the high-dimensional regime we consider a setup where both initial positions and perturbations have independent sub-Gaussian coordinates. In this setup we give sufficient conditions under which the same estimator makes no mistakes with high probability. We prove an analogous result for an adapted version of this estimator that incorporates information on the covariance matrix of the perturbations.

We study local optima of the Hamiltonian of the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model. We compute the exponent of the expected number of local optima and determine the "typical" value of the Hamiltonian.

In this paper we explore maximal deviations of large random structures from their typical behavior. We introduce a model for a high-dimensional random graph process and ask analogous questions to those of Vapnik and Chervonenkis for deviations of averages: how "rich" does the process have to be so that one sees atypical behavior. In particular, we study a natural process of Erdős-Rényi random graphs indexed by unit vectors in $\mathbb{R}^d$. We investigate the deviations of the process with respect to three fundamental properties: clique number, chromatic number, and connectivity. In all cases we establish upper and lower bounds for the minimal dimension $d$ that guarantees the existence of "exceptional directions" in which the random graph behaves atypically with respect to the property. For each of the three properties, four theorems are established, to describe upper and lower bounds for the threshold dimension in the subcritical and supercritical regimes.

Given an irreducible discrete-time Markov chain on a finite state space, we consider the largest expected hitting time $T(α)$ of a set of stationary measure at least $α$ for $α\in(0,1)$. We obtain tight inequalities among the values of $T(α)$ for different choices of $α$. One consequence is that $T(α) \le T(1/2)/α$ for all $α< 1/2$. As a corollary we have that, if the chain is lazy in a certain sense as well as reversible, then $T(1/2)$ is equivalent to the chain's mixing time, answering a question of Peres. We furthermore demonstrate that the inequalities we establish give an almost everywhere pointwise limiting characterisation of possible hitting time functions $T(α)$ over the domain $α\in(0,1/2]$.

Consider a system of coalescing random walks where each individual performs random walk over a finite graph G, or (more generally) evolves according to some reversible Markov chain generator Q. Let C be the first time at which all walkers have coalesced into a single cluster. C is closely related to the consensus time of the voter model for this G or Q. We prove that the expected value of C is at most a constant multiple of the largest hitting time of an element in the state space. This solves a problem posed by Aldous and Fill and gives sharp bounds in many examples, including all vertex-transitive graphs. We also obtain results on the expected time until only k>1 clusters remain. Our proof tools include a new exponential inequality for the meeting time of a reversible Markov chain and a deterministic trajectory, which we believe to be of independent interest.

We study random k-lifts of large, but otherwise arbitrary graphs G. We prove that, with high probability, all eigenvalues of the adjacency matrix of the lift that are not eigenvalues of G are of the order (D ln (kn))^{1/2}, where D is the maximum degree of G. Similarly, and also with high probability, the "new" eigenvalues of the Laplacian of the lift are all in an interval of length (ln (nk)/d)^{1/2} around 1, where d is the minimum degree of G. We also prove that, from the point of view of Spectral Graph Theory, there is very little difference between a random k_1k_2 ... k_r-lift of a graph and a random k_1-lift of a random k_2-lift of ... of a random k_r-lift of the same graph. The main proof tool is a concentration inequality for sums of random matrices that was recently introduced by the author.

Consider any random graph model where potential edges appear independently, with possibly different probabilities, and assume that the minimum expected degree is omega(ln n). We prove that the adjacency matrix and the Laplacian of that random graph are concentrated around the corresponding matrices of the weighted graph whose edge weights are the probabilities in the random model. While this may seem surprising, we will see that this matrix concentration phenomenon is a generalization of known results about the Erös-Rényi model. In particular, we will argue that matrix concentration is implicit the theory of quasi-random graph properties. We present two main applications of the main result. In bond percolation over a graph G, we show that the Laplacian of the random subgraph is typically very close to the Laplacian of G. As a corollary, we improve upon a bound for the spectral gap due to Chung and Horn that was derived via much more complicated methods. In inhomogeneous random graphs, there are points X_1,...,X_n uniformly distributed on the interval [0,1] and each pair is connected with probability p kappa(X_i,X_j). We show that if \ln n/n<< p<< 1 and kappa is bounded, then the adjacency matrix of the random graph is close to an integral operator defined in terms of kappa. Our main proof tool is a new concentration inequality for matrix martingales that generalizes Freedman's inequality for the standard scalar setting.

Consider a balls-in-bins process in which each new ball goes into a given bin with probability proportional to f(n), where n is the number of balls currently in the bin and f is a fixed positive function. It is known that these so-called balls-in-bins processes with feedback have a monopolistic regime: if f(x)=x^p for p>1, then there is a finite time after which one of the bins will receive all incoming balls. Our goal in this paper is to quantify the onset of monopoly. We show that the initial number of balls is large and bin 1 starts with a fraction α>1/2 of the balls, then with very high probability its share of the total number of balls never decreases significantly below α. Thus a bin that obtains more than half of the balls at a "large time" will most likely preserve its position of leadership. However, the probability that the winning bin has a non-negligible advantage after n balls are in the system is ~ C n^{1-p}, and the number of balls in the losing bin has a power-law tail. Similar results also hold for more general functions f.