arXiv++ Combinatorics

Katz centrality (and its limiting case, eigenvector centrality) is a frequently used tool to measure the importance of a node in a network, and to rank the nodes accordingly. One reason for its popularity is that Katz centrality can be computed very efficiently when the network is sparse, i.e., having only $O(n)$ edges between its $n$ nodes. While sparsity is common in practice, in some applications one faces the opposite situation of a very dense network, where only $O(n)$ potential edges are missing with respect to a complete graph. We explain why and how, even for very dense networks, it is possible to efficiently compute the ranking stemming from Katz centrality for unweighted graphs, possibly directed and possibly with loops, by working on the complement graph. Our approach also provides an interpretation, regardless of sparsity, of "Katz centrality with negative parameter" as usual Katz centrality on the complement graph. For weighted graphs, we provide instead an approximation method that is based on removing sufficiently many edges from the network (or from its complement), and we give sufficient conditions for this approximation to provide the correct ranking. We include numerical experiments to illustrate the advantages of the proposed approach.

Let $\mathcal{F}\subseteq \binom{[n]}{r}$ be an intersecting family of sets and let $Δ(\mathcal{F})$ be the maximum degree in $\mathcal{F}$, i.e., the maximum number of edges of $\mathcal{F}$ containing a fixed vertex. The \emph{diversity} of $\mathcal{F}$ is defined as $d(\mathcal{F}) := |\mathcal{F}| - Δ(\mathcal{F})$. Diversity can be viewed as a measure of distance from the `trivial' maximum-size intersecting family given by the Erd\H os-Ko-Rado Theorem. Indeed, the diversity of this family is $0$. Moreover, the diversity of the largest non-trivial intersecting family à la Hilton-Milner is $1$. It is known that the maximum possible diversity of an intersecting family $\mathcal{F}\subseteq \binom{[n]}{r}$ is $\binom{n-3}{r-2}$ as long as $n$ is large enough. We introduce a generalization called the \emph{$C$-weighted diversity} of $\mathcal{F}$ as $d_C(\mathcal{F}) := |\mathcal{F}| - C \cdot Δ(\mathcal{F})$. We determine the maximum value of $d_C(\mathcal{F})$ for intersecting families $\mathcal{F} \subseteq \binom{[n]}{r}$ and characterize the maximal families for $C\in \left[0,\frac{7}{3}\right)$ as well as give general bounds for all $C$. Our results imply, for large $n$, a recent conjecture of Frankl and Wang concerning a related diversity-like measure. Our primary technique is a variant of Frankl's Delta-system method.

We extend the notion of nonbacktracking walks from unweighted graphs to graphs whose edges have a nonnegative weight. Here the weight associated with a walk is taken to be the product over the weights along the individual edges. We give two ways to compute the associated generating function, and corresponding node centrality measures. One method works directly on the original graph and one uses a line graph construction followed by a projection. The first method is more efficient, but the second has the advantage of extending naturally to time-evolving graphs. Computational results are also provided.

We study walk-based centrality measures for time-ordered network sequences. For the case of standard dynamic walk-counting, we show how to derive and compute centrality measures induced by analytic functions. We also prove that dynamic Katz centrality, based on the resolvent function, has the unique advantage of allowing computations to be performed entirely at the node level. We then consider two distinct types of backtracking and develop a framework for capturing dynamic walk combinatorics when either or both is disallowed.