arXiv++ Combinatorics

We present new pivot rules for the Simplex method for LPs over 0/1 polytopes. We show that the number of non-degenerate steps taken using these rules is strongly polynomial and even linear in the dimension or in the number of variables. Our bounds on the number of steps are asymptotically optimal on several well-known combinatorial polytopes. Our analysis is based on the geometry of 0/1 polytopes and novel modifications to the classical Steepest-Edge and Shadow-Vertex pivot rules. We draw interesting connections between our pivot rules and other well-known algorithms in combinatorial optimization.

Circuit-augmentation algorithms are generalizations of the Simplex method, where in each step one is allowed to move along a fixed set of directions, called circuits, that is a superset of the edges of a polytope. We show that in the circuit-augmentation framework the greatest-improvement and Dantzig pivot rules are NP-hard, already for 0/1-LPs. Differently, the steepest-descent pivot rule can be carried out in polynomial time in the 0/1 setting, and the number of circuit augmentations required to reach an optimal solution according to this rule is strongly-polynomial for 0/1-LPs. The number of circuit augmentations has been of interest as a proxy for the number of steps in the Simplex method, and the circuit-diameter of polyhedra has been studied as a lower bound to the combinatorial diameter of polyhedra. Extending prior results, we show that for any polyhedron $P$ the circuit-diameter is bounded by a polynomial in the input bit-size of $P$. This is in contrast with the best bounds for the combinatorial diameter of polyhedra. Interestingly, we show that the circuit-augmentation framework can be exploited to make novel conclusions about the classical Simplex method itself: In particular, as a byproduct of our circuit results, we prove that (i) computing the shortest (monotone) path to an optimal solution on the 1-skeleton of a polytope is NP-hard, and hard to approximate within a factor better than 2, and (ii) for $0/1$ polytopes, a monotone path of strongly-polynomial length can be constructed using steepest improving edges.

The combinatorial diameter of a polytope $P$ is the maximum value of a shortest path between two vertices of $P$, where the path uses the edges of $P$ only. In contrast to the combinatorial diameter, the circuit diameter of $P$ is defined as the maximum value of a shortest path between two vertices of $P$, where the path uses potential edge directions of $P$ i.e., all edge directions that can arise by translating some of the facets of $P$. In this paper, we study the circuit diameter of polytopes corresponding to classical combinatorial optimization problems, such as the Matching polytope, the Traveling Salesman polytope and the Fractional Stable Set polytope.