arXiv++ Combinatorics

In embedding calculus, spaces of embeddings are identified with derived mapping spaces between framed Fulton-MacPherson-type modules (framed configuration spaces). Unfortunately, there are no sufficiently good algebraic models for framed Fulton-MacPherson modules that would allow us to explicitly describe the rational homotopy type of the embedding space. Recently there were several attempts to avoid dealing with the framed versions of Fulton-MacPherson modules by considering framed manifolds, e.g. embeddings modulo immersions $\overline{\mathrm{Emb}}$ in a recent paper by Fresse, Turchin and Willwacher, or embeddings with a deformation of the framing $\widetilde{\mathrm{Emb}}$ in a recent paper by the author. In both cases, the rational homotopy type of the corresponding embedding space has an explicit description in terms of graphs (hairy graph complexes). We construct a combinatorial graphical composition for the composition of embedding spaces $\widetilde{\mathrm{Emb}}$. As a step on our way, we describe the action of the coinduction functor on configuration-space-type $e_n^c$-comodules.

We study the question of realisability of iterated higher Whitehead products with a given form of nested brackets by simplicial complexes, using the notion of the moment-angle complex $Z_K$. Namely, we say that a simplicial complex $K$ realises an iterated higher Whitehead product $w$ if $w$ is a nontrivial element of $π_*(Z_K)$. The combinatorial approach to the question of realisability uses the operation of substitution of simplicial complexes: for any iterated higher Whitehead product $w$ we describe a simplicial complex $\partialΔ_w$ that realises $w$. Furthermore, for a particular form of brackets inside $w$, we prove that $\partialΔ_w$ is the smallest complex that realises $w$. We also give a combinatorial criterion for the nontriviality of the product $w$. In the proof of nontriviality we use the Hurewicz image of $w$ in the cellular chains of $Z_K$ and the description of the cohomology product of $Z_K$. The second approach is algebraic: we use the coalgebraic versions of the Koszul and Taylor complex for the face coalgebra of $K$ to describe the canonical cycles corresponding to iterated higher Whitehead products $w$. This gives another criterion for realisability of $w$.