Papers by Shahriar Shahriari
5 paper(s) by this author
· All BibTeX
$3$-cluster-free families of subspaces
Three $k$-dimensional subspaces $A$, $B$, and $C$ of an $n$-dimensional vector space $V$ over a finite field are called a $3$-cluster if $A \cap B \cap C = \{\mathbf{0}_V\}$ and yet $\dim(A+B+C) \leq 2k$. A special kind of $3$-cluster, which we call a covering triple, consists of subspaces $A,B,C$ such that $A = (A \cap B )\oplus (A \cap C)$. We prove that, for $2 \leq k \le n/2$, the largest size of a covering triple-free family of $k$-dimensional subspaces is the same as the size of the largest such star (a family of subspaces all containing a designated non-zero vector). Moreover, we show that if $k < n/2$, then stars are the only families achieving this largest size. This in turn implies the same result for $3$-clusters, which gives the vector space-analogue of a theorem of Mubayi for set systems.
Avoiding Brooms, Forks, and Butterflies in the Linear Lattices
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
Let $n$ be a positive integer, $q$ a power of a prime, and $\mathcal{L}_n(q)$ the poset of subspaces of an $n$-dimensional vector space over a field with $q$ elements. This poset is a normalized matching poset and the set of subspaces of dimension $\left\lfloor n/2 \right\rfloor$ or those of dimension $\left\lceil n/2 \right\rceil$ are the only maximum-sized anti-chains in this poset. Strengthening this well-known and celebrated result, we show that, except in the case of $\mathcal{L}_3(2)$, these same collections of subspaces are the only maximum-sized families in $\mathcal{L}_n(q)$ that avoid both a $\wedge$ and a $\vee$ as a subposet. We generalize some of the results to brooms and forks, and we also show that the union of the set of subspaces of dimension $k$ and $k+1$, for $k = \left\lfloor n/2 \right\rfloor$ or $k = \left\lceil n/2 \right\rceil-1$, are the only maximum-sized families in $\mathcal{L}_n(q)$ that avoid a butterfly (definitions below).
On Uniform f-vectors of Cutsets in the Truncated Boolean Lattice
Let $[n] = \{1, 2, \ldots, n\}$ and let $2^{[n]}$ be the collection of all subsets of $[n]$ ordered by inclusion. ${\cal C} \subseteq 2^{[n]}$ is a {\em cutset} if it meets every maximal chain in $2^{[n]}$, and the {\em width} of ${\cal C} \subseteq 2^{[n]}$ is the minimum number of chains in a chain decomposition of ${\cal C}$. Fix $0 \leq m \leq l \leq n$. What is the smallest value of $k$ such that there exists a cutset that consists only of subsets of sizes between $m$ and $l$, and such that it contains exactly $k$ subsets of size $i$ for each $m \leq i \leq l$? The answer, which we denote by $g_n(m,l)$, gives a lower estimate for the width of a cutset between levels $m$ and $l$ in $2^{[n]}$. After using the Kruskal-Katona Theorem to give a general characterization of cutsets in terms of the number and sizes of their elements, we find lower and upper bounds (as well as some exact values) for $g_n(m,l)$.
A New Quadratic Bound for the Manickam-Miklós-Singhi Conjecture
More than twenty-five years ago, Manickam, Miklos, and Singhi conjectured that for positive integers $n,k$ with $n \geq 4k$, every set of $n$ real numbers with nonnegative sum has at least $\binom{n-1}{k-1}$ $k$-element subsets whose sum is also nonnegative. We verify this conjecture when $n \geq 8k^2$, which simultaneously improves and simplifies a bound of Alon, Huang, and Sudakov and also a bound of Pokrovskiy when $k < 10^{45}$.
The Manickam-Miklós-Singhi Conjectures for Sets and Vector Spaces
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
More than twenty-five years ago, Manickam, Miklós, and Singhi conjectured that for positive integers $n,k$ with $n \geq 4k$, every set of $n$ real numbers with nonnegative sum has at least $\binom{n-1}{k-1}$ $k$-element subsets whose sum is also nonnegative. We verify this conjecture when $n \geq 8k^{2}$, which simultaneously improves and simplifies a bound of Alon, Huang, and Sudakov and also a bound of Pokrovskiy when $k < 10^{45}$.
Moreover, our arguments resolve the vector space analogue of this conjecture. Let $V$ be an $n$-dimensional vector space over a finite field. Assign a real-valued weight to each $1$-dimensional subspace in $V$ so that the sum of all weights is zero. Define the weight of a subspace $S \subset V$ to be the sum of the weights of all the $1$-dimensional subspaces it contains. We prove that if $n \geq 3k$, then the number of $k$-dimensional subspaces in $V$ with nonnegative weight is at least the number of $k$-dimensional subspaces in $V$ that contain a fixed $1$-dimensional subspace. This result verifies a conjecture of Manickam and Singhi from 1988.