arXiv++ Combinatorics

Let $k \ge 2$ and let $\bf G = \{G_1, \ldots, G_{m}\}$ be a collection of graphs on a common vertex set of cardinality $n$. We show that if each graph in $\bf G$ has minimum degree at least $(1-\frac{1}{2k} + o(1))n$, then for every edge-colouring $χ$ of the $k$th power of a Hamilton cycle $C_n^k$ with $m$ colours, there is a copy of $C_n^k$ in $\bf G$ such that $e \in G_{χ(e)}$ for every edge $e$ in $C_n^k$. This generalises a result of Bowtell, Morris, Pehova, and Staden, who provided asymptotically best possible minimum degree conditions for the Hamilton cycle.

The $r$-bond bootstrap percolation process on a graph $G$ begins with a set $S$ of infected edges of $G$ (all other edges are healthy). At each step, a healthy edge becomes infected if at least one of its endpoints is incident with at least $r$ infected edges (and it remains infected). If $S$ eventually infects all of $E(G)$, we say $S$ percolates. In this paper we provide recursive formulae for the minimum size of percolating sets in several large families of graphs. We utilise an algebraic method introduced by Hambardzumyan, Hatami, and Qian, and substantially extend and generalise their work.

For an oriented graph $D$ and a set $X\subseteq V(D)$, the inversion of $X$ in $D$ is the graph obtained from $D$ by reversing the orientation of each edge that has both endpoints in $X$. Define the inversion number of $D$, denoted $\mathrm{inv}(D)$, to be the minimum number of inversions required to obtain an acyclic oriented graph from $D$. The dijoin, denoted $D_1\rightarrow D_2$, of two oriented graphs $D_1$ and $D_2$ is constructed by taking vertex-disjoint copies of $D_1$ and $D_2$ and adding all edges from $D_1$ to $D_2$. We show that $\mathrm{inv}({D_1 \rightarrow D_2}) > \mathrm{inv}(D_1)$, for any oriented graphs $D_1$ and $D_2$ such that $\mathrm{inv}(D_1) = \mathrm{inv}(D_2) \ge 1$. This resolves a question of Aubian, Havet, Hörsch, Klingelhoefer, Nisse, Rambaud and Vermande. Our proof proceeds via a natural connection between the graph inversion number and the subgraph complementation number.

Given a graph $H$, we say that an edge-coloured graph $G$ is $H$-rainbow saturated if it does not contain a rainbow copy of $H$, but the addition of any non-edge in any colour creates a rainbow copy of $H$. The rainbow saturation number $\text{rsat}(n,H)$ is the minimum number of edges among all $H$-rainbow saturated edge-coloured graphs on $n$ vertices. We prove that for any non-empty graph $H$, the rainbow saturation number is linear in $n$, thus proving a conjecture of Girão, Lewis, and Popielarz. In addition, we also give an improved upper bound on the rainbow saturation number of the complete graph, disproving a second conjecture of Girão, Lewis, and Popielarz.