arXiv++ Combinatorics

Swish is a card game in which players are given cards having symbols (hoops and balls), and find a valid superposition of cards, called a "swish." Dailly, Lafourcade, and Marcadet (FUN 2024) studied a generalized version of Swish and showed that the problem is solvable in polynomial time with one symbol per card, while it is NP-complete with three or more symbols per card. In this paper, we resolve the previously open case of two symbols per card, which corresponds to the original game. We show that Swish is NP-complete for this case. Specifically, we prove the NP-hardness when the allowed transformations of cards are restricted to a single (horizontal or vertical) flip or 180-degree rotation, and extend the results to the original setting allowing all three transformations. In contrast, when neither transformation is allowed, we present a polynomial-time algorithm. Combining known and our results, we establish a complete characterization of the computational complexity of Swish with respect to both the number of symbols per card and the allowed transformations.

Matroids are often represented as oracles since there are no unified and compact representations for general matroids. This paper initiates the study of binary decision diagrams (BDDs) and zero-suppressed binary decision diagrams (ZDDs) as relatively compact data structures for representing matroids in a computer. This study particularly focuses on the sizes of BDDs and ZDDs representing matroids. First, we compare the sizes of different variations of BDDs and ZDDs for a matroid. These comparisons involve concise transformations between specific decision diagrams. Second, we provide upper bounds on the size of BDDs and ZDDs for several classes of matroids. These bounds are closely related to the number of minors of the matroid and depend only on the connectivity function or pathwidth of the matroid, which deeply relates to the classes of matroids called strongly pigeonhole classes. In essence, these results indicate upper bounds on the number of minors for specific classes of matroids and new strongly pigeonhole classes.

Given graphs $G$ and $H$, we propose a method to implicitly enumerate topological-minor-embeddings of $H$ in $G$ using decision diagrams. We show a useful application of our method to enumerating subgraphs characterized by forbidden topological minors, that is, planar, outerplanar, series-parallel, and cactus subgraphs. Computational experiments show that our method can find all planar subgraphs in a given graph at most five orders of magnitude faster than a naive backtracking-based method.

An associative magic square is a magic square such that the sum of any 2 cells at symmetric positions with respect to the center is constant. The total number of associative magic squares of order 7 is enormous, and thus, it is not realistic to obtain the number by simple backtracking. As a recent result, Artem Ripatti reported the number of semi-magic squares of order 6 (the magic squares of 6x6 without diagonal sum conditions) in 2018. In this research, with reference to Ripatti's method of enumerating semi-magic squares, we have calculated the total number of associative magic squares of order 7. There are exactly 1,125,154,039,419,854,784 associative magic squares of order 7, excluding symmetric patterns.

Unigraphs are graphs uniquely determined by their own degree sequence up to isomorphism. There are many subclasses of unigraphs such as threshold graphs, split matrogenic graphs, matroidal graphs, and matrogenic graphs. Unigraphs and these subclasses are well studied in the literature. Nevertheless, there are few results on superclasses of unigraphs. In this paper, we introduce two types of generalizations of unigraphs: $k$-unigraphs and $k$-strong unigraphs. We say that a graph $G$ is a $k$-unigraph if $G$ can be partitioned into $k$ unigraphs. $G$ is a $k$-strong unigraph if not only each subgraph is a unigraph but also the whole graph can be uniquely determined up to isomorphism, by using the degree sequences of all the subgraphs in the partition. We describe a relation between $k$-strong unigraphs and the subgraph isomorphism problem. We show some properties of $k$-(strong) unigraphs and algorithmic results on calculating the minimum $k$ such that a graph $G$ is a $k$-(strong) unigraph. This paper will open many other research topics.