arXiv++ Combinatorics

The layer number of a finite point set is the number of iterations needed to delete it by repeatedly removing the vertices of its convex hull. Ambrus, Hsu, Peng, and Yan conjectured that the layer number of the $d$-dimensional integer grid $\{1,\ldots,n\}^d$ is of order $n^{2d/(d+1)}$ for every fixed $d$. We prove this conjecture. Let $P_i$ be the convex hull of the point set remaining after $i$ steps, and let $Z_n$ be the convex hull of the lattice points in the Euclidean ball of radius $n$. For every step that leaves a nonempty point set, the Minkowski sum $P_{i+1}+Z_n$ contains no vertex of $P_i+Z_n$. Integrality of normalized lattice volume, together with the Bárány--Larman vertex estimate for $Z_n$, gives a lower bound, independent of $i$, on the resulting volume decrease. Summing over $i$ yields the matching upper bound, even when $P_i$ is lower-dimensional. For $d\ge2$, the same upper bound holds uniformly over all nonempty subsets of $\{1,\ldots,n\}^d$.

A \textit{linear $3$-graph}, $H = (V, E)$, is a set, $V$, of vertices together with a set, $E$, of $3$-element subsets of $V$, called edges, so that any two distinct edges intersect in at most one vertex. The linear Turán number, ${\rm ex}(n,F)$, is the maximum number of edges in a linear $3$-graph $H$ with $n$ vertices containing no copy of $F$. We focus here on the \textit{crown}, $C$, which consists of three pairwise disjoint edges (jewels) and a fourth edge (base) which intersects all of the jewels. Our main result is that every linear $3$-graph with minimum degree at least $4$ contains a crown. This is not true if $4$ is replaced by $3$. In fact the known bounds of the Turán number are \[ 6 \left\lfloor{\frac{n - 3}{4}}\right\rfloor \leq {\rm ex}(n, C) \leq 2n, \] and in the construction providing the lower bound all but three vertices have degree $3$. We conjecture that ${\rm ex}(n, C) \sim \frac{3n}{2}$ but even if this were known it would not imply our main result. Our second result is a step towards a possible proof of ${\rm ex}(n,C) \leq \frac{3n}{2}$ (i.e., determining it within a constant error). We show that a minimal counterexample to this statement must contain certain configurations with $9$ edges and we conjecture that all of them lead to contradiction.