Papers by Willem Fletcher
3 paper(s) by this author
· All BibTeX
Improved Upper Bound on the Linear Turán Number of the Crown
A linear $3$-graph is a set of vertices along with a set of edges, which are three element subsets of the vertices, such that any two edges intersect in at most one vertex. The crown, $C$, is a specific $3$-graph consisting of three pairwise disjoint edges, called jewels, along with a fourth edge intersecting all three jewels. For a linear $3$-graph, $F$, the linear Turán number, $ex(n,F)$, is the maximum number of edges in any linear $3$-graph that does not contain $F$ as a subgraph. Currently, the best known bounds on the linear Turán number of the crown are
\[ 6 \Big \lfloor \frac{n-3}{4}\Big \rfloor \leq ex(n, C) \leq 2n. \] In this paper, the upper bound is improved to $ex(n,C) < \frac{5n}{3}$.
Crowns in linear $3$-graphs
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
A \textit{linear $3$-graph}, $H = (V, E)$, is a set, $V$, of vertices together with a set, $E$, of $3$-element subsets of $V$, called edges, so that any two distinct edges intersect in at most one vertex. The linear Turán number, ${\rm ex}(n,F)$, is the maximum number of edges in a linear $3$-graph $H$ with $n$ vertices containing no copy of $F$.
We focus here on the \textit{crown}, $C$, which consists of three pairwise disjoint edges (jewels) and a fourth edge (base) which intersects all of the jewels. Our main result is that every linear $3$-graph with minimum degree at least $4$ contains a crown. This is not true if $4$ is replaced by $3$. In fact the known bounds of the Turán number are \[ 6 \left\lfloor{\frac{n - 3}{4}}\right\rfloor \leq {\rm ex}(n, C) \leq 2n, \] and in the construction providing the lower bound all but three vertices have degree $3$. We conjecture that ${\rm ex}(n, C) \sim \frac{3n}{2}$ but even if this were known it would not imply our main result.
Our second result is a step towards a possible proof of ${\rm ex}(n,C) \leq \frac{3n}{2}$ (i.e., determining it within a constant error). We show that a minimal counterexample to this statement must contain certain configurations with $9$ edges and we conjecture that all of them lead to contradiction.
Graphs with Many Hamiltonian Paths
Published in Involve 18 (2025) 613-627
• View Publication
• BIB
A graph is \emph{hamiltonian-connected} if every pair of vertices can be connected by a hamiltonian path, and it is \emph{hamiltonian} if it contains a hamiltonian cycle. We construct families of non-hamiltonian graphs for which the ratio of pairs of vertices connected by hamiltonian paths to all pairs of vertices approaches 1. We then consider minimal graphs that are hamiltonian-connected. It is known that any order-$n$ graph that is hamiltonian-connected must have $\geq 3n/2$ edges. We construct an infinite family of graphs realizing this minimum.