arXiv++ Combinatorics

The famous Ham-Sandwich theorem states that any $d$ point sets in $\mathbb{R}^d$ can be simultaneously bisected by a single hyperplane. The $α$-Ham-Sandwich theorem gives a sufficient condition for the existence of biased cuts, i.e., hyperplanes that do not cut off half but some prescribed fraction of each point set. We give two new proofs for this theorem. The first proof is completely combinatorial and highlights a strong connection between the $α$-Ham-Sandwich theorem and Unique Sink Orientations of grids. The second proof uses point-hyperplane duality and the Poincaré-Miranda theorem and allows us to generalize the result to and beyond oriented matroids. For this we introduce a new concept of rainbow arrangements, generalizing colored pseudo-hyperplane arrangements. Along the way, we also show that the realizability problem for rainbow arrangements is $\exists \mathbb{R}$-complete, which also implies that the realizability problem for grid Unique Sink Orientations is $\exists \mathbb{R}$-complete.

A unique sink orientation (USO) is an orientation of the $n$-dimensional hypercube graph such that every non-empty face contains a unique sink. Schurr showed that given any $n$-dimensional USO and any dimension $i$, the set of edges $E_i$ in that dimension can be decomposed into equivalence classes (so-called phases), such that flipping the orientation of a subset $S$ of $E_i$ yields another USO if and only if $S$ is a union of a set of these phases. In this paper we prove various results on the structure of phases. Using these results, we show that all phases can be computed in $O(3^n)$ time, significantly improving upon the previously known $O(4^n)$ trivial algorithm. Furthermore, we show that given a boolean circuit of size $poly(n)$ succinctly encoding an $n$-dimensional (acyclic) USO, it is PSPACE-complete to determine whether two given edges are in the same phase. The problem is thus equally difficult as determining whether the hypercube orientation encoded by a given circuit is an acyclic USO [Gärtner and Thomas, STACS'15].

It is well-known that the 2-Thief-Necklace-Splitting problem reduces to the discrete Ham Sandwich problem. In fact, this reduction was crucial in the proof of the PPA-completeness of the Ham Sandwich problem [Filos-Ratsikas and Goldberg, STOC'19]. Recently, a variant of the Ham Sandwich problem called $α$-Ham Sandwich has been studied, in which the point sets are guaranteed to be well-separated [Steiger and Zhao, DCG'10]. The complexity of this search problem remains unknown, but it is known to lie in the complexity class UEOPL [Chiu, Choudhary and Mulzer, ICALP'20]. We define the analogue of this well-separability condition in the necklace splitting problem -- a necklace is $n$-separable, if every subset $A$ of the $n$ types of jewels can be separated from the types $[n]\setminus A$ by at most $n$ separator points. By the reduction to the Ham Sandwich problem it follows that this version of necklace splitting has a unique solution. We furthermore provide two FPT algorithms: The first FPT algorithm solves 2-Thief-Necklace-Splitting on $(n-1+\ell)$-separable necklaces with $n$ types of jewels and $m$ total jewels in time $2^{O(\ell\log\ell)}+m^2$. In particular, this shows that 2-Thief-Necklace-Splitting is polynomial-time solvable on $n$-separable necklaces. Thus, attempts to show hardness of $α$-Ham Sandwich through reduction from the 2-Thief-Necklace-Splitting problem cannot work. The second FPT algorithm tests $(n-1+\ell)$-separability of a given necklace with $n$ types of jewels in time $2^{O(\ell^2)}\cdot n^4$. In particular, $n$-separability can thus be tested in polynomial time, even though testing well-separation of point sets is coNP-complete [Bergold et al., SWAT'22].

For any positive edge density $p$, a random graph in the Erdős-Renyi $G_{n,p}$ model is connected with non-zero probability, since all edges are mutually independent. We consider random graph models in which edges that do not share endpoints are independent while incident edges may be dependent and ask: what is the minimum probability $ρ(n)$, such that for any distribution $\mathcal{G}$ (in this model) on graphs with $n$ vertices in which each potential edge has a marginal probability of being present at least $ρ(n)$, a graph drawn from $\mathcal{G}$ is connected with non-zero probability? As it turns out, the condition ``edges that do not share endpoints are independent'' needs to be clarified and the answer to the question above is sensitive to the specification. In fact, we formalize this intuitive description into a strict hierarchy of five independence conditions, which we show to have at least three different behaviors for the threshold $ρ(n)$. For each condition, we provide upper and lower bounds for $ρ(n)$. In the strongest condition, the coloring model (which includes, e.g., random geometric graphs), we show that $ρ(n)\rightarrow 2-φ\approx 0.38$ for $n\rightarrow\infty$, proving a conjecture by Badakhshian, Falgas-Ravry, and Sharifzadeh. This separates the coloring models from the weaker independence conditions we consider, as there we prove that $ρ(n)>0.5-o(n)$. In stark contrast to the coloring model, for our weakest independence condition -- pairwise independence of non-adjacent edges -- we show that $ρ(n)$ lies within $O(1/n^2)$ of the threshold $1-2/n$ for completely arbitrary distributions.

Klaus showed that the Oriented Matroid Complementarity Problem (OMCP) can be solved by a reduction to the problem of sink-finding in a unique sink orientation (USO) if the input is promised to be given by a non-degenerate extension of a P-matroid. In this paper, we investigate the effect of degeneracy on this reduction. On the one hand, this understanding of degeneracies allows us to prove a linear lower bound on the number of vertex evaluations required for sink-finding in P-matroid USOs, the set of USOs obtainable through Klaus' reduction. On the other hand, it allows us to adjust Klaus' reduction to also work with degenerate instances. Furthermore, we introduce a total search version of the P-Matroid Oriented Matroid Complementarity Problem (P-OMCP). Given any extension of any oriented matroid M, by reduction to a total search version of USO sink-finding we can either solve the OMCP, or provide a polynomial-time verifiable certificate that M is not a P-matroid. This places the total search version of the P-OMCP in the complexity class Unique End of Potential Line (UEOPL).

Unique Sink Orientations (USOs) of cubes can be used to capture the combinatorial structure of many essential algebraic and geometric problems. For various structural and algorithmic questions, including enumeration of USOs and algorithm analysis, it is crucial to have systematic constructions of USOs. While some construction methods for USOs already exist, each one of them has some significant downside. Most of the construction methods have limited expressivity -- USOs with some desired properties cannot be constructed. In contrast, the phase flips of Schurr can construct all USOs, but the operation is not well understood. We were inspired by techniques from cube tilings of space; we expand upon existing techniques in the area to develop generalized rewriting rules for USOs. These rewriting rules are a new construction framework which can be applied to all USOs. The rewriting rules can generate every USO using only USOs of lower dimension. The effect of any specific rewriting rule on an USO is simple to understand. A special case of our construction produces a new elementary transformation of USOs, which we call a partial swap. We further investigate the relationship between partial swaps and phase flips and generalize partial swaps to phase swaps.

Algorithms for finding the sink in Unique Sink Orientations (USOs) of the hypercube can be used to solve many algebraic and geometric problems, most importantly including the P-Matrix Linear Complementarity Problem and Linear Programming. The realizable USOs are those that arise from the reductions of these problems to the USO sink-finding problem. Finding the sink of realizable USOs is thus highly practically relevant, yet it is unknown whether realizability can be exploited algorithmically to find the sink more quickly. However, all (non-trivial) known unconditional lower bounds for sink-finding make use of USOs that are provably not realizable. This indicates that the sink-finding problem might indeed be strictly easier on realizable USOs. In this paper we show that this is true for a subclass of all USOs. We consider the class of Matoušek-type USOs, which are a translation of Matoušek's LP-type problems into the language of USOs. We show a query complexity gap between sink-finding in all, and sink-finding in only the realizable $n$-dimensional Matoušek-type USOs. We provide concrete deterministic algorithms and lower bounds for both cases, and show that in the realizable case $O(log^2 n)$ vertex evaluation queries suffice, while in general exactly $n$ queries are needed. The Matoušek-type USOs are the first USO class found to admit such a gap.

The Matoušek LP-type problems were used by Matoušek to show that the Sharir-Welzl algorithm may require at least subexponential time. Later, Gärtner translated this result into the language of Unique Sink Orientations (USOs) and introduced the Matoušek USOs, the USOs equivalent to Matoušek's LP-type problems. He further showed that the Random Facet algorithm only requires quadratic time on the realizable subset of the Matoušek USOs, but without characterizing this subset. In this paper, we deliver this missing characterization and also provide concrete realizations for all realizable Matoušek USOs. Furthermore, we show that the realizable Matoušek USOs are exactly the orientations arising from simple extensions of cyclic-P-matroids.