arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study solution discovery in the token-sliding model from a logical and cost-value optimization perspective. In solution discovery, we are given a graph, an initial placement of $k$ tokens, and a movement budget $b$. The task is to find a reachable target configuration satisfying a prescribed condition. Our results are inspired by \textsc{Partial Vertex Cover Discovery}, where the condition is that the~$k$ tokens cover at least $t$ edges of the input graph. This objective is not merely a sum of independent occupied vertex contributions: each selected vertex contributes its degree, but edges with both endpoints selected have to be subtracted once. To capture this phenomenon, we introduce \textsc{FO Value Discovery}, an optimization problem in which the value of a selected tuple is given by unary vertex weights together with first-order definable correction terms. We further generalize the setting to \textsc{FO Cost-Value Decision}, where vertices carry both costs and values, and the task is to decide whether there is a tuple whose first-order value expression reaches a prescribed value threshold while respecting a cost bound. Finally, we study the parameterized complexity of \textsc{Partial Vertex Cover Discovery} and \textsc{Vertex Cover Discovery}. As a consequence of the logical meta-theorems, we obtain fixed-parameter tractability of \textsc{Partial Vertex Cover Discovery} on several graph classes, including classes of locally bounded cliquewidth. We also show that \textsc{Partial Vertex Cover Discovery} is W[1]-hard parameterized by $k+b$ and fixed-parameter tractable on $d$-degenerate graphs parameterized by $k+d$. For \textsc{Vertex Cover Discovery}, we prove NP-hardness on planar graphs, W[1]-hardness parameterized by the clique cover number, even when a clique cover is supplied with the input, and W[1]-hardness with respect to parameter cutwidth.

We study solution discovery, where the goal is to obtain a feasible solution to a problem from an initial configuration by a bounded sequence of local moves. In many applications, however, the graph that defines which vertex sets are feasible is not the same as the graph that governs how tokens, agents, or resources may move. Existing models such as token sliding and token jumping typically do not distinguish the problem graph and the movement graph. Motivated by this mismatch, we introduce a directed weighted two-graph model that cleanly separates feasibility from movement. A problem graph specifies the desired combinatorial objects, while a movement graph specifies admissible relocations and their costs. This yields a flexible framework that captures asymmetry, heterogeneous movement constraints, and weighted transitions, while subsuming classical discovery models as special cases. We investigate this model through \textsc{Path Discovery} and \textsc{Shortest Path Discovery}, where the task is to realize a vertex set containing an $s$-$t$-path or a shortest $s$-$t$-path in the problem graph. These problems are particularly natural in applications, since directed and weighted shortest paths are among the most fundamental algorithmic primitives. At the same time, previous work has already shown that discovery can be computationally hard even when the underlying optimization problem is easy. Our results show that this phenomenon persists, and becomes especially rich, in the two-graph setting. We obtain a detailed complexity picture, identifying tractable cases as well as strong hardness results.

In the solution discovery variant of a vertex (edge) subset problem $Π$ on graphs, we are given an initial configuration of tokens on the vertices (edges) of an input graph $G$ together with a budget $b$. The question is whether we can transform this configuration into a feasible solution of $Π$ on $G$ with at most $b$ modification steps. We consider the token sliding variant of the solution discovery framework, where each modification step consists of sliding a token to an adjacent vertex (edge). The framework of solution discovery was recently introduced by Fellows et al. [Fellows et al., ECAI 2023] and for many solution discovery problems the classical as well as the parameterized complexity has been established. In this work, we study the kernelization complexity of the solution discovery variants of Vertex Cover, Independent Set, Dominating Set, Shortest Path, Matching, and Vertex Cut with respect to the parameters number of tokens $k$, discovery budget $b$, as well as structural parameters such as pathwidth.

In the recently introduced framework of solution discovery via reconfiguration [Fellows et al., ECAI 2023], we are given an initial configuration of $k$ tokens on a graph and the question is whether we can transform this configuration into a feasible solution (for some problem) via a bounded number $b$ of small modification steps. In this work, we study solution discovery variants of polynomial-time solvable problems, namely Spanning Tree Discovery, Shortest Path Discovery, Matching Discovery, and Vertex/Edge Cut Discovery in the unrestricted token addition/removal model, the token jumping model, and the token sliding model. In the unrestricted token addition/removal model, we show that all four discovery variants remain in P. For the toking jumping model we also prove containment in P, except for Vertex/Edge Cut Discovery, for which we prove NP-completeness. Finally, in the token sliding model, almost all considered problems become NP-complete, the exception being Spanning Tree Discovery, which remains polynomial-time solvable. We then study the parameterized complexity of the NP-complete problems and provide a full classification of tractability with respect to the parameters solution size (number of tokens) $k$ and transformation budget (number of steps) $b$. Along the way, we observe strong connections between the solution discovery variants of our base problems and their (weighted) rainbow variants as well as their red-blue variants with cardinality constraints.