arXiv++ Combinatorics

We give new examples of graphs and trees with dominating set sequences that are not log-concave. These examples were generated by PatternBoost, a transformer-based reinforcement learning software developed by Charton-Ellenberg-Wagner-Williamson. We also show: for any positive integer $m$, there exists a tree whose dominating set sequence is not log-concave for at least $m$ indices by modifying a similar construction of Bautista-Ramos for the independent set sequence. We show that a large class of caterpillar graphs has log-concave dominating set sequences. A continuous analogue of the sequence is also log-concave for all graphs.

Linek's 1989 problem asks whether the numbers of independent sets of trees avoid infinitely many positive integers. We show that the set of natural numbers realized as the number of independent sets of a tree has a lower growth exponent of $0.1966$. We further prove that the set of positive integers representable by connected planar graphs has asymptotic density one. Lastly, we establish a phase transition: the number of independent sets of graphs with fewer than $d|V|$ edges for any $d<1$ is contained in a set of density zero, whereas, following Shkredov's recent breakthrough on Zaremba's conjecture in continued fraction theory, there exists a constant $D$ such that the number of independent sets of graphs with at most $D|V|$ edges covers all positive integers.

Using the calculus of variations, we prove the following structure theorem for noise stable partitions: a partition of $n$-dimensional Euclidean space into $m$ disjoint sets of fixed Gaussian volumes that maximize their noise stability must be $(m-1)$-dimensional, if $m-1\leq n$. In particular, the maximum noise stability of a partition of $m$ sets in $\mathbb{R}^{n}$ of fixed Gaussian volumes is constant for all $n$ satisfying $n\geq m-1$. From this result, we obtain: (i) A proof of the Plurality is Stablest Conjecture for $3$ candidate elections, for all correlation parameters $ρ$ satisfying $0<ρ<ρ_{0}$, where $ρ_{0}>0$ is a fixed constant (that does not depend on the dimension $n$), when each candidate has an equal chance of winning. (ii) A variational proof of Borell's Inequality (corresponding to the case $m=2$). The structure theorem answers a question of De-Mossel-Neeman and of Ghazi-Kamath-Raghavendra. Item (i) is the first proof of any case of the Plurality is Stablest Conjecture of Khot-Kindler-Mossel-O'Donnell (2005) for fixed $ρ$, with the case $ρ\to1^{-}$ being solved recently. Item (i) is also the first evidence for the optimality of the Frieze-Jerrum semidefinite program for solving MAX-3-CUT, assuming the Unique Games Conjecture. Without the assumption that each candidate has an equal chance of winning in (i), the Plurality is Stablest Conjecture is known to be false.

We demonstrate a method for proving precise concentration inequalities in uniformly random trees on $n$ vertices, where $n\geq1$ is a fixed positive integer. The method uses a bijection between mappings $f\colon\{1,\ldots,n\}\to\{1,\ldots,n\}$ and doubly rooted trees on $n$ vertices. The main application is a concentration inequality for the number of vertices connected to an independent set in a uniformly random tree, which is then used to prove partial unimodality of its independent set sequence. So, we give probabilistic arguments for inequalities that often use combinatorial arguments.

We survey the design of elections that are resilient to attempted interference by third parties. For example, suppose votes have been cast in an election between two candidates, and then each vote is randomly changed with a small probability, independently of the other votes. It is desirable to keep the outcome of the election the same, regardless of the changes to the votes. It is well known that the US electoral college system is about 5 times more likely to have a changed outcome due to vote corruption, when compared to a majority vote. In fact, Mossel, O'Donnell and Oleszkiewicz proved in 2005 that the majority voting method is most stable to this random vote corruption, among voting methods where each person has a small influence on the election. We discuss some recent progress on the analogous result for elections between more than two candidates. In this case, plurality should be most stable to corruption in votes. We also survey results on adversarial election manipulation (where an adversary can select particular votes to change, perhaps in a non-random way), and we briefly discuss ranked choice voting methods (where a vote is a ranked list of candidates).

An independent set of size $k$ in a finite undirected graph $G$ is a set of $k$ vertices of the graph, no two of which are connected by an edge. Let $x_{k}(G)$ be the number of independent sets of size $k$ in the graph $G$ and let $α(G)=\max\{k\geq0\colon x_{k}(G)\neq0\}$. In 1987, Alavi, Malde, Schwenk and Erdös asked if the independent set sequence $x_{0}(G),x_{1}(G),\ldots,x_{α(G)}(G)$ of a tree is unimodal (the sequence goes up and then down). This problem is still open. In 2006, Levit and Mandrescu showed that the last third of the independent set sequence of a tree is decreasing. We show that the first 46.8\% of the independent set sequence of a random tree is increasing with (exponentially) high probability as the number of vertices goes to infinity. So, the question of Alavi, Malde, Schwenk and Erdös is ``four-fifths true'', with high probability. We also show unimodality of the independent set sequence of Erdös-Renyi random graphs, when the expected degree of a single vertex is large (with (exponentially) high probability as the number of vertices in the graph goes to infinity, except for a small region near the mode). A weaker result is shown for random regular graphs. The structure of independent sets of size $k$ as $k$ varies is of interest in probability, statistical physics, combinatorics, and computer science.