arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Svein Høgemo

3 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
2024-02-28
Lower Bounds for Leaf Rank of Leaf Powers
Leaf powers and $k$-leaf powers have been studied for over 20 years, but there are still several aspects of this graph class that are poorly understood. One such aspect is the leaf rank of leaf powers, i.e. the smallest number $k$ such that a graph $G$ is a $k$-leaf power. Computing the leaf rank of leaf powers has proved a hard task, and furthermore, results about the asymptotic growth of the leaf rank as a function of the number of vertices in the graph have been few and far between. We present an infinite family of rooted directed path graphs that are leaf powers, and prove that they have leaf rank exponential in the number of vertices (utilizing a type of subtree model first presented by Rautenbach [Some remarks about leaf roots. Discrete mathematics, 2006]). This answers an open question by Brandstädt et al. [Rooted directed path graphs are leaf powers. Discrete mathematics, 2010].
Recognition of Linear and Star Variants of Leaf Powers is in P
Published • View PublicationBIB
A $k$-leaf power of a tree $T$ is a graph $G$ whose vertices are the leaves of $T$ and whose edges connect pairs of leaves whose distance in $T$ is at most $k$. A graph is a leaf power if it is a $k$-leaf power for some $k$. Over 20 years ago, Nishimura et al. [J. Algorithms, 2002] asked if recognition of leaf powers was in P. Recently, Lafond [SODA 2022] showed an XP algorithm when parameterized by $k$, while leaving the main question open. In this paper, we explore this question from the perspective of two alternative models of leaf powers, showing that both a linear and a star variant of leaf powers can be recognized in polynomial-time.
2020-08-07
Hierarchical Clusterings of Unweighted Graphs
We study the complexity of finding an optimal hierarchical clustering of an unweighted similarity graph under the recently introduced Dasgupta objective function. We introduce a proof technique, called the normalization procedure, that takes any such clustering of a graph $G$ and iteratively improves it until a desired target clustering of G is reached. We use this technique to show both a negative and a positive complexity result. Firstly, we show that in general the problem is NP-complete. Secondly, we consider min-well-behaved graphs, which are graphs $H$ having the property that for any $k$ the graph $H(k)$ being the join of $k$ copies of $H$ has an optimal hierarchical clustering that splits each copy of $H$ in the same optimal way. To optimally cluster such a graph $H(k)$ we thus only need to optimally cluster the smaller graph $H$. Co-bipartite graphs are min-well-behaved, but otherwise they seem to be scarce. We use the normalization procedure to show that also the cycle on 6 vertices is min-well-behaved.