arXiv++ Combinatorics

The topic of this paper is "gerrymandering", namely the curse of deliberate creations of district maps with highly asymmetric electoral outcomes to disenfranchise voters, and it has a long legal history. Measuring and eliminating gerrymandering has enormous implications to sustain the backbone of democratic principles of a society. Although there is no dearth of legal briefs involving gerrymandering over many years, it is only more recently that mathematicians and applied computational researchers have started to investigate this topic. However, it has received relatively little attention so far from the computational complexity researchers dealing with theoretical analysis of computational complexity issues, such as computational hardness, approximability issues, etc. There could be many reasons for this, such as descriptions of these problem non-CS non-math (often legal or political) journals that theoretical CS (TCS) people usually do not follow, or the lack of coverage of these topics in TCS publication venues. One of our modest goals in writing this article is to improve upon this situation by stimulating further interactions between the gerrymandering and TCS researchers. To this effect, our main contributions are twofold: (1) we provide formalization of several models, related concepts, and corresponding problem statements using TCS frameworks from the descriptions of these problems as available in existing non-TCS (perhaps legal) venues, and (2) we also provide computational complexity analysis of some versions of these problems, leaving other versions for future research. The goal of writing this article is not to have the final word on gerrymandering, but to introduce a series of concepts, models and problems to the TCS community and to show that science of gerrymandering involves an intriguing set of partitioning problems involving geometric and combinatorial optimization.

Partisan gerrymandering is a major cause for voter disenfranchisement in United States. However, convincing US courts to adopt specific measures to quantify gerrymandering has been of limited success to date. Recently, Stephanopoulos and McGhee introduced a new and precise measure of partisan gerrymandering via the so-called "efficiency gap" that computes the absolutes difference of wasted votes between two political parties in a two-party system. Quite importantly from a legal point of view, this measure was found legally convincing enough in a US appeals court in a case that claims that the legislative map of the state of Wisconsin was gerrymandered; the case is now pending in US Supreme Court. In this article, we show the following: (a) We provide interesting mathematical and computational complexity properties of the problem of minimizing the efficiency gap measure. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first non-trivial theoretical and algorithmic analyses of this measure of gerrymandering. (b) We provide a simple and fast algorithm that can "un-gerrymander" the district maps for the states of Texas, Virginia, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania by bring their efficiency gaps to acceptable levels from the current unacceptable levels. Our work thus shows that, notwithstanding the general worst case approximation hardness of the efficiency gap measure as shown by us,finding district maps with acceptable levels of efficiency gaps is a computationally tractable problem from a practical point of view. Based on these empirical results, we also provide some interesting insights into three practical issues related the efficiency gap measure. We believe that, should the US Supreme Court uphold the decision of lower courts, our research work and software will provide a crucial supporting hand to remove partisan gerrymandering.