arXiv++ Combinatorics

Parameterized analysis provides powerful mechanisms for obtaining fine-grained insights into different types of algorithms. In this work, we combine this field with evolutionary algorithms and provide parameterized complexity analysis of evolutionary multi-objective algorithms for the $W$-separator problem, which is a natural generalization of the vertex cover problem. The goal is to remove the minimum number of vertices such that each connected component in the resulting graph has at most $W$ vertices. We provide different multi-objective formulations involving two or three objectives that provably lead to fixed-parameter evolutionary algorithms with respect to the value of an optimal solution $OPT$ and $W$. Of particular interest are kernelizations and the reducible structures used for them. We show that in expectation the algorithms make incremental progress in finding such structures and beyond. The current best known kernelization of the $W$-separator uses linear programming methods and requires a non-trivial post-process to extract the reducible structures. We provide additional structural features to show that evolutionary algorithms with appropriate objectives are also capable of extracting them. Our results show that evolutionary algorithms with different objectives guide the search and admit fixed parameterized runtimes to solve or approximate (even arbitrarily close) the $W$-separator problem.

Combinatorial optimization problems are a prominent application area of evolutionary algorithms, where the (1+1) EA is one of the most investigated. We extend this algorithm by introducing some problem knowledge with a specialized mutation operator which works under the assumption that the number of 1s of a solution is critical, as frequently happens in combinatorial optimization. This slight modification increases the chance to correct wrongly placed bits while preserving the simplicity and problem independence of the (1+1) EA. As an application of our algorithm we examine the vertex cover problem on certain instances, where we show that it leads to asymptotically better runtimes and even finds with higher probability optimal solutions in comparison with the usual (1+1) EA. Precisely, we compare the performance of both algorithms on paths and on complete bipartite graphs of size $n$. Regarding the path we prove that, for a particular initial configuration, the \alg1+1 takes in expectation $Θ(n^4)$ iterations while the modification reduces this to $Θ(n^3)$, and present experimental evidence that such a configuration is reached. Concerning the complete bipartite graph our modification finds the optimum in polynomial time with probability $1-1/2^{Ω(n^ξ)}$ for every positive constant $ξ< 1$, which improves the known probability of $1-1/\text{poly}(n)$ for the (1+1) EA..

We introduce the balanced crown decomposition that captures the structure imposed on graphs by their connected induced subgraphs of a given size. Such subgraphs are a popular modeling tool in various application areas, where the non-local nature of the connectivity condition usually results in very challenging algorithmic tasks. The balanced crown decomposition is a combination of a crown decomposition and a balanced partition which makes it applicable to graph editing as well as graph packing and partitioning problems. We illustrate this by deriving improved kernelization and approximation algorithms for a variety of such problems. In particular, through this structure, we obtain the first constant-factor approximation for the Balanced Connected Partition (BCP) problem, where the task is to partition a vertex-weighted graph into $k$ connected components of approximately equal weight. We derive a 3-approximation for the two most commonly used objectives of maximizing the weight of the lightest component or minimizing the weight of the heaviest component.

We investigate the maximum-entropy model $\mathcal{B}_{n,m,p}$ for random $n$-vertex, $m$-edge multi-hypergraphs with expected edge size $pn$. We show that the expected size of the minimization of $\mathcal{B}_{n,m,p}$, i.e., the number of its inclusion-wise minimal edges, undergoes a phase transition with respect to $m$. If $m$ is at most $1/(1-p)^{(1-p)n}$, then the minimization is of size $Θ(m)$. Beyond that point, for $α$ such that $m = 1/(1-p)^{αn}$ and $\mathrm{H}$ being the entropy function, it is $Θ(1) \cdot \min\!\left(1, \, \frac{1}{(α\,{-}\,(1-p)) \sqrt{(1\,{-}\,α) n}}\right) \cdot 2^{(\mathrm{H}(α) + (1-α) \log_2 p) n}.$ This implies that the maximum expected size over all $m$ is $Θ((1+p)^n/\sqrt{n})$. Our structural findings have algorithmic implications for minimizing an input hypergraph, which in turn has applications in the profiling of relational databases as well as for the Orthogonal Vectors problem studied in fine-grained complexity. The main technical tool is an improvement of the Chernoff--Hoeffding inequality, which we make tight up to constant factors. We show that for a binomial variable $X \sim \mathrm{Bin}(n,p)$ and real number $0 < x \le p$, it holds that $\mathrm{P}[X \le xn] = Θ(1) \cdot \min\!\left(1, \, \frac{1}{(p-x) \sqrt{xn}}\right) \cdot 2^{-\!\mathrm{D}(x \,{\|}\, p) n}$, where $\mathrm{D}$ denotes the Kullback--Leibler divergence between Bernoulli distributions. The result remains true if $x$ depends on $n$ as long as it is bounded away from $0$.

The rotor router model is a popular deterministic analogue of a random walk on a graph. Instead of moving to a random neighbor, the neighbors are served in a fixed order. We examine how fast this "deterministic random walk" covers all vertices (or all edges). We present general techniques to derive upper bounds for the vertex and edge cover time and derive matching lower bounds for several important graph classes. Depending on the topology, the deterministic random walk can be asymptotically faster, slower or equally fast as the classic random walk. We also examine the short term behavior of deterministic random walks, that is, the time to visit a fixed small number of vertices or edges.

Jim Propp's rotor router model is a deterministic analogue of a random walk on a graph. Instead of distributing chips randomly, each vertex serves its neighbors in a fixed order. Cooper and Spencer (Comb. Probab. Comput. (2006)) show a remarkable similarity of both models. If an (almost) arbitrary population of chips is placed on the vertices of a grid $\Z^d$ and does a simultaneous walk in the Propp model, then at all times and on each vertex, the number of chips on this vertex deviates from the expected number the random walk would have gotten there by at most a constant. This constant is independent of the starting configuration and the order in which each vertex serves its neighbors. This result raises the question if all graphs do have this property. With quite some effort, we are now able to answer this question negatively. For the graph being an infinite $k$-ary tree ($k \ge 3$), we show that for any deviation $D$ there is an initial configuration of chips such that after running the Propp model for a certain time there is a vertex with at least $D$ more chips than expected in the random walk model. However, to achieve a deviation of $D$ it is necessary that at least $\exp(Ω(D^2))$ vertices contribute by being occupied by a number of chips not divisible by $k$ at a certain time.

We give an algorithm that computes the final state of certain growth models without computing all intermediate states. Our technique is based on a "least action principle" which characterizes the odometer function of the growth process. Starting from an approximation for the odometer, we successively correct under- and overestimates and provably arrive at the correct final state. Internal diffusion-limited aggregation (IDLA) is one of the models amenable to our technique. The boundary fluctuations in IDLA were recently proved to be at most logarithmic in the size of the growth cluster, but the constant in front of the logarithm is still not known. As an application of our method, we calculate the size of fluctuations over two orders of magnitude beyond previous simulations, and use the results to estimate this constant.

Jim Propp's rotor router model is a deterministic analogue of a random walk on a graph. Instead of distributing chips randomly, each vertex serves its neighbors in a fixed order. We analyze the difference between Propp machine and random walk on the infinite two-dimensional grid. It is known that, apart from a technicality, independent of the starting configuration, at each time, the number of chips on each vertex in the Propp model deviates from the expected number of chips in the random walk model by at most a constant. We show that this constant is approximately 7.8, if all vertices serve their neighbors in clockwise or counterclockwise order and 7.3 otherwise. This result in particular shows that the order in which the neighbors are served makes a difference. Our analysis also reveals a number of further unexpected properties of the two-dimensional Propp machine.