arXiv++ Combinatorics

A path partition (also referred to as a linear forest) of a graph $G$ is a set of vertex-disjoint paths which together contain all the vertices of $G$. An isolated vertex is considered to be a path in this case. The path partition conjecture states that every $n$-vertices $d$-regular graph has a path partition with at most $\frac{n}{d+1}$ paths. The conjecture has been proved for all $d<6$. We prove the conjecture for $d=6$.

Consider algorithms with unbounded computation time that probe the entries of the adjacency matrix of an $n$ vertex graph, and need to output a clique. We show that if the input graph is drawn at random from $G_{n,\frac{1}{2}}$ (and hence is likely to have a clique of size roughly $2\log n$), then for every $δ< 2$ and constant $\ell$, there is an $α< 2$ (that may depend on $δ$ and $\ell$) such that no algorithm that makes $n^δ$ probes in $\ell$ rounds is likely (over the choice of the random graph) to output a clique of size larger than $α\log n$.

Let $G$ be a $2$-coloring of a complete graph on $n$ vertices, for sufficiently large $n$. We prove that $G$ contains at least $n^{(\frac{1}{4} - o(1))\log n}$ monochromatic complete subgraphs of size $r$, where \[ 0.3\log n < r < 0.7\log n. \] The previously known lower bound on the total number of monochromatic complete subgraphs, due to Székely was $n^{0.1576\log n}$. We also prove that $G$ contains at least $n^{\frac{1}{7} \log n} $ monochromatic complete subgraphs of size $\frac{1}{2}\log n$. If furthermore one assumes that the largest monochromatic complete subgraph in $G$ is of size $(\frac{1}{2} + o(1))\log n$ (it is a well known open question whether such graphs exist), then for every constant $0 \le c \le \frac{1}{2}$ we determine (up to low order terms) the number of monochromatic complete subgraphs of size $c \log n$. We do so by proving a lower bound that matches (up to low order terms) a previous upper bound of Székely. For example, the number of monochromatic complete subgraphs of size $\frac{1}{2} \log n$ is $n^{\frac{1}{8}(4 - \log e \pm o(1))\log n} \simeq n^{0.32 \log n}$.

In a recent work, Mossel and Ross considered the shotgun assembly problem for a random jigsaw puzzle. Their model consists of a puzzle - an $n\times n$ grid, where each vertex is viewed as a center of a piece. They assume that each of the four edges adjacent to a vertex, is assigned one of $q$ colors (corresponding to "jigs", or cut shapes) uniformly at random. Mossel and Ross asked: how large should $q = q(n)$ be so that with high probability the puzzle can be assembled uniquely given the collection of individual tiles? They showed that if $q = ω(n^2)$, then the puzzle can be assembled uniquely with high probability, while if $q = o(n^{2/3})$, then with high probability the puzzle cannot be uniquely assembled. Here we improve the upper bound and show that for any $\eps > 0$, the puzzle can be assembled uniquely with high probability if $q \geq n^{1+\eps}$. The proof uses an algorithm of $n^{Θ(1/\eps)}$ running time.

We consider the following activation process in undirected graphs: a vertex is active either if it belongs to a set of initially activated vertices or if at some point it has at least $r$ active neighbors. A \emph{contagious set} is a set whose activation results with the entire graph being active. Given a graph $G$, let $m(G,r)$ be the minimal size of a contagious set. We study this process on the binomial random graph $G:=G(n,p)$ with $p: = \frac{d}{n}$ and $1 \ll d \ll \left(\frac{n \log \log n}{\log^2 n}\right)^{\frac{r-1}{r}}$. Assuming $r > 1$ to be a constant that does not depend on $n$, we prove that $$m(G,r) = Θ\left(\frac{n}{d^{\frac{r}{r-1}}\log d}\right),$$ with high probability. We also show that the threshold probability for $m(G,r)=r$ to hold is $p^*=Θ\left(\frac{1}{(n \log^{r-1} n)^{1/r}}\right)$.

O'Donnell, Wright, Wu and Zhou [SODA 2014] introduced the notion of robustly asymmetric graphs. Roughly speaking, these are graphs in which for every $0 \le ρ\le 1$, every permutation that permutes a $ρ$ fraction of the vertices maps a $Θ(ρ)$ fraction of the edges to non-edges. We show that there are graphs for which the constant hidden in the $Θ$ notation is roughly~1.

Given an undirected $n$-vertex graph $G(V,E)$ and an integer $k$, let $T_k(G)$ denote the random vertex induced subgraph of $G$ generated by ordering $V$ according to a random permutation $π$ and including in $T_k(G)$ those vertices with at most $k-1$ of their neighbors preceding them in this order. The distribution of subgraphs sampled in this manner is called the \emph{layers model with parameter} $k$. The layers model has found applications in studying $\ell$-degenerate subgraphs, the design of algorithms for the maximum independent set problem, and in bootstrap percolation. In the current work we expand the study of structural properties of the layers model. We prove that there are $3$-regular graphs $G$ for which with high probability $T_3(G)$ has a connected component of size $Ω(n)$. Moreover, this connected component has treewidth $Ω(n)$. This lower bound on the treewidth extends to many other random graph models. In contrast, $T_2(G)$ is known to be a forest (hence of treewidth~1), and we establish that if $G$ is of bounded degree then with high probability the largest connected component in $T_2(G)$ is of size $O(\log n)$. We also consider the infinite two-dimensional grid, for which we prove that the first four layers contain a unique infinite connected component with probability $1$.

We consider the following activation process in undirected graphs: a vertex is active either if it belongs to a set of initially activated vertices or if at some point it has at least $r$ active neighbors, where $r>1$ is the activation threshold. A \emph{contagious set} is a set whose activation results with the entire graph being active. Given a graph $G$, let $m(G,r)$ be the minimal size of a contagious set. Computing $m(G,r)$ is NP-hard. It is known that for every $d$-regular or nearly $d$-regular graph on $n$ vertices, $m(G,r) \le O(\frac{nr}{d})$. We consider such graphs that additionally have expansion properties, parameterized by the spectral gap and/or the girth of the graphs. The general flavor of our results is that sufficiently strong expansion (e.g., $λ(G)=O(\sqrt{d})$, or girth $Ω(\log \log d)$) implies that $m(G,2) \le O(\frac{n}{d^2})$ (and more generally, $m(G,r) \le O(\frac{n}{d^{r/(r-1)}})$). Significantly weaker expansion properties suffice in order to imply that $m(G,2)\le O(\frac{n \log d}{d^2})$. For example, we show this for graphs of girth at least~7, and for graphs with $λ(G)<(1-ε)d$, provided the graph has no 4-cycles. Nearly $d$-regular expander graphs can be obtained by considering the binomial random graph $G(n,p)$ with $p \simeq \frac{d}{n}$ and $d > \log n$. For such graphs we prove that $Ω(\frac{n}{d^2 \log d}) \le m(G,2) \le O(\frac{n\log\log d}{d^2\log d})$ almost surely. Our results are algorithmic, entailing simple and efficient algorithms for selecting contagious sets.

In the {\em Musical Chairs} game $MC(n,m)$ a team of $n$ players plays against an adversarial {\em scheduler}. The scheduler wins if the game proceeds indefinitely, while termination after a finite number of rounds is declared a win of the team. At each round of the game each player {\em occupies} one of the $m$ available {\em chairs}. Termination (and a win of the team) is declared as soon as each player occupies a unique chair. Two players that simultaneously occupy the same chair are said to be {\em in conflict}. In other words, termination (and a win for the team) is reached as soon as there are no conflicts. The only means of communication throughout the game is this: At every round of the game, the scheduler selects an arbitrary nonempty set of players who are currently in conflict, and notifies each of them separately that it must move. A player who is thus notified changes its chair according to its deterministic program. As we show, for $m\ge 2n-1$ chairs the team has a winning strategy. Moreover, using topological arguments we show that this bound is tight. For $m\leq 2n-2$ the scheduler has a strategy that is guaranteed to make the game continue indefinitely and thus win. We also have some results on additional interesting questions. For example, if $m \ge 2n-1$ (so that the team can win), how quickly can they achieve victory?