arXiv++ Combinatorics

Fix a positive integer $n$ and consider the bipartite graph whose vertices are the $3$-element subsets and the $2$-element subsets of $[n]=\{1,2,\dots,n\}$, and there is an edge between $A$ and $B$ if $A\subset B$. We prove that the domination number of this graph is $\binom{n}{2}-\lfloor\frac{(n+1)^2}{8}\rfloor$, we characterize the dominating sets of minimum size, and we observe that the minimum size dominating set can be chosen as an independent set. This is an exact version of an asymptotic result by Balogh, Katona, Linz and Tuza (2021). For the corresponding bipartite graph between the $(k+1)$-element subsets and the $k$-elements subsets of $[n]$ ($k\geq 3$), we provide a new construction for small independent dominating sets. This improves on a construction by Gerbner, Kezegh, Lemons, Palmer, Pálvölgyi and Patkós (2012), who studied these independent dominating sets under the name saturating flat antichains.

This is the second of two papers investigating for which positive integers $m$ there exists a maximal antichain of size $m$ in the Boolean lattice $B_n$ (the power set of $[n]:=\{1,2,\dots,n\}$, ordered by inclusion). In the first part, the sizes of maximal antichains have been characterized. Here we provide an alternative construction with the benefit of showing that almost all sizes of maximal antichains can be obtained using antichains containing only $l$-sets and $(l+1)$-sets for some $l$.

Extending a classical theorem of Sperner, we characterize the integers $m$ such that there exists a maximal antichain of size $m$ in the Boolean lattice $B_n$, that is, the power set of $[n]:=\{1,2,\dots,n\}$, ordered by inclusion. As an important ingredient in the proof, we initiate the study of an extension of the Kruskal-Katona theorem which is of independent interest. For given positive integers $t$ and $k$, we ask which integers $s$ have the property that there exists a family $\mathcal F$ of $k$-sets with $\lvert\mathcal F\rvert=t$ such that the shadow of $\mathcal F$ has size $s$, where the shadow of $\mathcal F$ is the collection of $(k-1)$-sets that are contained in at least one member of $\mathcal F$. We provide a complete answer for $t\leqslant k+1$. Moreover, we prove that the largest integer which is not the shadow size of any family of $k$-sets is $\sqrt 2k^{3/2}+\sqrt[4]{8}k^{5/4}+O(k)$.

This is the second in a sequence of three papers investigating the question for which positive integers $m$ there exists a maximal antichain of size $m$ in the Boolean lattice $B_n$ (the power set of $[n]:=\{1,2,\dots,n\}$, ordered by inclusion). In the previous paper we characterized those $m$ between $\binom{n}{\lceil n/2\rceil}-\lceil n/2\rceil^2$ and the maximum size $\binom{n}{\lceil n/2 \rceil}$ that are not sizes of maximal antichains. In this paper we show that all smaller $m$ are sizes of maximal antichains.

Building on classical theorems of Sperner and Kruskal-Katona, we investigate antichains $\mathcal F$ in the Boolean lattice $B_n$ of all subsets of $[n]:=\{1,2,\dots,n\}$, where $\mathcal F$ is flat, meaning that it contains sets of at most two consecutive sizes, say $\mathcal F=\mathcal{A}\cup\mathcal{B}$, where $\mathcal{A}$ contains only $k$-subsets, while $\mathcal{B}$ contains only $(k-1)$-subsets. Moreover, we assume $\mathcal{A}$ consists of the first $m$ $k$-subsets in squashed (colexicographic) order, while $\mathcal{B}$ consists of all $(k-1)$-subsets not contained in the subsets in $\mathcal{A}$. Given reals $α,β>0$, we say the weight of $\mathcal F$ is $α\cdot|\mathcal{A}|+β\cdot|\mathcal{B}|$. We characterize the minimum weight antichains $\mathcal F$ for any given $n,k,α,β$, and we do the same when in addition $\mathcal F$ is a maximal antichain. We can then derive asymptotic results on both the minimum size and the minimum Lubell function.

Let $n\geqslant 3$ be a natural number. We study the problem to find the smallest $r$ such that there is a family $\mathcal{A}$ of 2-subsets and 3-subsets of $[n]=\{1,2,...,n\}$ with the following properties: (1) $\mathcal{A}$ is an antichain, i.e. no member of $\mathcal A$ is a subset of any other member of $\mathcal A$, (2) $\mathcal A$ is maximal, i.e. for every $X\in 2^{[n]}\setminus\mathcal A$ there is an $A\in\mathcal A$ with $X\subseteq A$ or $A\subseteq X$, and (3) $\mathcal A$ is $r$-regular, i.e. every point $x\in[n]$ is contained in exactly $r$ members of $\mathcal A$. We prove lower bounds on $r$, and we describe constructions for regular maximal antichains with small regularity.

Let $n\geqslant 4$ be a natural number, and let $K$ be a set $K\subseteq [n]:={1,2,...,n}$. We study the problem to find the smallest possible size of a maximal family $\mathcal{A}$ of subsets of $[n]$ such that $\mathcal{A}$ contains only sets whose size is in $K$, and $A\not\subseteq B$ for all ${A,B}\subseteq\mathcal{A}$, i.e. $\mathcal{A}$ is an antichain. We present a general construction of such antichains for sets $K$ containing 2, but not 1. If $3\in K$ our construction asymptotically yields the smallest possible size of such a family, up to an $o(n^2)$ error. We conjecture our construction to be asymptotically optimal also for $3\not\in K$, and we prove a weaker bound for the case $K={2,4}$. Our asymptotic results are straightforward applications of the graph removal lemma to an equivalent reformulation of the problem in extremal graph theory which is interesting in its own right.