arXiv++ Combinatorics

The inversion of a set $X$ of vertices in an oriented graph reverses every arc with both endpoints in $X$. The inversion graph $I(G)$ of a graph $G$ has the labelled orientations of $G$ as its vertices, two orientations being adjacent when a single inversion transforms one into the other, and the inversion diameter $\diam(I(G))$ is its diameter. Answering a question of Havet, Hörsch and Rambaud, we prove the bound in terms of edge number $\diam(I(G)) \le 2\sqrt{|E(G)|}$, and we complement it with a lower bound $\diam(I(G)) \ge \frac{|E(G)|}{|V(G)|}$ obtained by viewing $I(G)$ as a Cayley graph on $\F_2^{E(G)}$. We further refine the upper bound for bipartite graphs $G$ by showing $ \diam(I(G))\le \max\left\{ρ, \left\lceil\log_2\bigl(2+σ(2^{ρ-1}-1)\bigr)\right\rceil\right\}$ where the two parts of $G$ have maximum degrees $σ$ and $ρ$, respectively.

The strong Ramsey game $R(\mathcal{B}, H)$ is a two-player game played on a graph $\mathcal{B}$, referred to as the board, with a target graph $H$. In this game, two players, $P_1$ and $P_2$, alternately claim unclaimed edges of $\mathcal{B}$, starting with $P_1$. The goal is to claim a subgraph isomorphic to $H$, with the first player achieving this declared the winner. A fundamental open question, persisting for over three decades, asks whether there exists a graph $H$ such that in the game $R(K_n, H)$, $P_1$ does not have a winning strategy in a bounded number of moves as $n \to \infty$. In this paper, we shift the focus to the variant $R(K_n \sqcup K_n, H)$, introduced by David, Hartarsky, and Tiba, where the board $K_n \sqcup K_n$ consists of two disjoint copies of $K_n$. We prove that there exist infinitely many graphs $H$ such that $P_1$ cannot win in $R(K_n \sqcup K_n, H)$ within a bounded number of moves through a concise proof. This perhaps provides evidence for the existence of examples to the above longstanding open problem.