arXiv++ Combinatorics

An edge-colored hypergraph is called \emph{a rainbow hypergraph} if all the colors on its edges are distinct. Given two positive integers $n,r$ and an $r$-uniform hypergraph $\mathcal{G}$, the anti-Ramsey number $ar_r(n,\mathcal{G})$ is defined to be the minimum number of colors $t$ such that there exists a rainbow copy of $\mathcal{G}$ in any exactly $t$-edge-coloring of the complete $r$-uniform hypergraph of order $n$. Let $ \mathcal{F}_k $ denote the 3-graph ($k$-star) consisting of $k$ edges sharing exactly one vertex. Tang, Li and Yan \cite{YTG} determined the value of $ar_3(n,\mathcal{F}_3)$ when $n\geq 20$. In this paper, we determine the anti-Ramsey number $ar_3(n,\mathcal{F}_{k+1})$, where $k\geq 3$ and $n> \frac{5}{2}k^3+\frac{15}{2}k^2+26k-3$.

An edge-colored graph is called a rainbow graph if all its edges have distinct colors. The anti-Ramsey number $ar(n, G)$, for a graph $G$ and a positive integer $n$, is defined as the minimum number of colors $r$ such that every exact $r$-edge-coloring of the complete graph $K_n$ contains at least one rainbow copy of $G$. A $(k, r)$-fan graph, denoted $F_{k, r}$, is a graph composed of $k$ cliques each of size $r$, all intersecting at exactly one common vertex. In this paper, we determine $ar(n, F_{k, r})$ for $n \geq 256r^{16}(k+1)^5$, $k \geq 1$, and $r \geq 2$.

An edge-colored graph is called \textit{rainbow graph} if all the colors on its edges are distinct. Given a positive integer $n$ and a graph $G$, the \textit{anti-Ramsey number} $ar(n,G)$ is defined to be the minimum number of colors $r$ such that there exists a rainbow copy of $G$ in any exactly $r$-edge-coloring of $K_n$. Wu et al. (Anti-Ramsey numbers for vertex-disjoint triangles, \emph{Discrete. Math.}, \textbf{346} (2022), 113123) determined the anti-Ramsey number $ar(n, kK_3)$ for $n\geq 2k^2-k+2 $. In this paper, we extend this result by improving the lower bound on $n$ to $n\geq 15k+57$.

Let $n,k,s$ be three integers such that $k\geq 2$ and $n\geq s\geq 1$. Let $H$ be a $k$-partite $k$-uniform hypergraph with $n$ vertices in each class. Aharoni (2017) showed that if $e(H)>(s-1)n^{k-1}$, then $H$ has a matching of size $s$. In this paper, we give a stability result for 3-partite 3-uniform hypergraphs: if $G$ is a $3$-partite $3$-uniform hypergraph with $n\geq 162$ vertices in each class, $e(G)\geq (s-1)n^2+3n-s$ and $G$ contains no matching of size $s+1$, then $G$ has a vertex cover of size $s$. Our bound is also tight.

Let $G$ be a graph and $g,f:V(G)\to2^N$ be two set functions such that $g(v)\le f(v)$ and $g(v)\equiv f(v)\pmod 2$ for every $v\in V(G)$. An orientation $O$ of $G$ is called a $(g,f)$-parity orientation if $g(v)\le d^+_O(v)\le f(v)$ and $g(v)\equiv d^+_O(v)\pmod 2$ for every $v\in V(G)$. In this paper, we give a Tutte-type characterization for a graph to have a $(g,f)$-parity orientation.

Let $G$ be a graph and $F:V(G)\to2^N$ be a set function. The graph $G$ is said to be \emph{F-avoiding} if there exists an orientation $O$ of $G$ such that $d^+_O(v)\notin F(v)$ for every $v\in V(G)$, where $d^+_O(v)$ denotes the out-degree of $v$ in the directed graph $G$ with respect to $O$. In this paper, we give a Tutte-type good characterization to decide the $F$-avoiding problem when for every $v\in V(G)$, $|F(v)|\leq \frac{1}{2}(d_G(v)+1)$ and $F(v)$ contains no two consecutive integers. Our proof also gives a simple polynomial algorithm to find a desired orientation. As a corollary, we prove the following result: if for every $v\in V(G)$, $|F(v)|\leq \frac{1}{2}(d_G(v)+1)$ and $F(v)$ contains no two consecutive integers, then $G$ is $F$-avoiding. This partly answers a problem proposed by Akbari et. al.(2020)

Let $n,m$ be integers such that $1\leq m\leq (n-2)/2$ and let $[n]=\{1,\ldots,n\}$. Let $\mathcal{G}=\{G_1,\ldots,G_{m+1}\}$ be a family of graphs on the same vertex set $[n]$. In this paper, we prove that if for any $i\in [m+1]$, the spectral radius of $G_i$ is not less than $\max\{2m,\frac{1}{2}(m-1+\sqrt{(m-1)^2+4m(n-m)})\}$, then $\mathcal{G}$ admits a rainbow matching, i.e. a choice of disjoint edges $e_i\in G_i$, unless $G_1=G_2=\ldots=G_{m+1}$ and $G_1\in \{K_{2m+1}\cup (n-2m-1)K_1, K_m\vee (n-m)K_1\}$.