arXiv++ Combinatorics

Given a tournament $T$, Aboulker, Aubian, Charbit, and Lopes (2023) defined its clique number $\vecω(T)$ as the minimum clique number of a backedge graph of $T$, and raised the question: Which classes of tournaments are polynomially $\vecχ$-bounded? Aboulker, Duron, Jacob, Kimbrough, Thomassé, and this work's authors (2026) showed that this holds for classes of tournaments whose arc sets may be written as the union of a bounded number of comparability digraphs. What about classes of tournaments that do not admit such a decomposition? The crossing tournaments of Nguyen, Scott, and Seymour (2025) are an example of such a class, as shown in the aforementioned 2026 work; we show that nonetheless crossing tournaments are polynomially $\vecχ$-bounded by adapting a method of Davies and McCarty (2021) and Davies (2022). We additionally show that we cannot extend this result for crossing tournaments to tournaments with chordal graphs as backedge graphs.

For which graphs $H$ does there exist a graph $G$ with at least one edge and no induced subgraph isomorphic to $H$, such that deleting any edge of $G$ creates an induced copy of $H$? We call such a graph "$H$-deletion-saturated". This version of the well-studied notion of "$H$-induced-saturated" graphs -- where both adding and deleting any edge creates an induced copy of $H$ -- appears more tractable. For example, while it remains wide open whether $H$-induced-saturated graphs exist for every even cycle $H$, we proved recently that deletion-saturated graphs exist for all even cycles. In fact, apart from complete graphs, no graph $H$ is known for which $H$-deletion-saturated graphs do not exist. We conjecture that $H$-deletion-saturated graphs exist for every non-complete graph $H$, and prove this conjecture for several types of graphs, including: complete bipartite graphs with parts of unequal size, triangle-free graphs with one cycle, graphs with two leaves at distance at most three, and line graphs of trees. In fact, in all cases, we prove the conjecture for substantially more general families. We also verify our conjecture for every graph $H$ on at most six vertices.

Aboulker, Aubian, Charbit, and Lopes (2023) defined the clique number of a tournament to be the minimum clique number of one of its backedge graphs. Here we show that if $T$ is a tournament of sufficiently large clique number, then $T$ contains a subtournament of large clique number from one of two simple families of tournaments. In particular, large clique number is always certified by a bounded-size set. This answers a question of Aboulker, Aubian, Charbit, and Lopes (2023), and gives new insight into a line of research initiated by Kim and Kim (2018) into unavoidable subtournaments in tournaments with large dichromatic number.

For graphs $G$ and $H$, we say that $G$ is $H$-free if no induced subgraph of $G$ is isomorphic to $H$, and that $G$ is $H$-induced-saturated if $G$ is $H$-free but removing or adding any edge in $G$ creates an induced copy of $H$. A full characterization of graphs $H$ for which $H$-induced-saturated graphs exist remains elusive. Even the case where $H$ is a path -- now settled by the collective results of Martin and Smith, Bonamy et al., and Dvoŕǎk -- was already quite challenging. What if $H$ is a cycle? The complete answer for odd cycles was given by Behren et al., leaving the case of even cycles (except for the $4$-cycle) wide open. Our main result is the first step toward closing this gap: We prove that for every even cycle $H$, there is a graph $G$ with at least one edge such that $G$ is $H$-free but removing any edge from $G$ creates an induced copy of $H$ (in fact, we construct $H$-induced-saturated graphs for every even cycle $H$ on at most 10 vertices).