arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study the strong structural controllability (SSC) of diffusively coupled networks, where the external control inputs are injected to only some nodes, namely the leaders. For such systems, one measure of controllability is the dimension of strong structurally controllable subspace, which is equal to the smallest possible rank of controllability matrix under admissible (positive) coupling weights. In this paper, we compare two tight lower bounds on the dimension of strong structurally controllable subspace: one based on the distances of followers to leaders, and the other based on the graph coloring process known as zero forcing. We show that the distance-based lower bound is usually better than the zero-forcing-based bound when the leaders do not constitute a zero-forcing set. On the other hand, we also show that any set of leaders that can be shown to achieve complete SSC via the distance-based bound is necessarily a zero-forcing set. These results indicate that while the zero-forcing based approach may be preferable when the focus is only on verifying complete SSC, the distance-based approach is usually more informative when partial SSC is also of interest. Furthermore, we also present a novel bound based on the combination of these two approaches, which is always at least as good as, and in some cases strictly greater than, the maximum of the two bounds. We support our analysis with numerical results for various graphs and leader sets.

We investigate how the graph topology influences the robustness to noise in undirected linear consensus networks. We measure the structural robustness by using the smallest possible value of steady state population variance of states under the noisy consensus dynamics with edge weights from the unit interval. We derive tight upper and lower bounds on the structural robustness of networks based on the average distance between nodes and the average node degree. Using the proposed bounds, we characterize the networks with different types of robustness scaling under increasing size. Furthermore, we present a fundamental trade-off between the structural robustness and the average degree of networks. While this trade-off implies that a desired level of structural robustness can only be achieved by graphs with a sufficiently large average degree, we also show that there exist dense graphs with poor structural robustness. We then show that, random k-regular graphs (the degree of each node is k) with n nodes typically have near-optimal structural robustness among all the graphs with size n and average degree k for sufficiently large n and k. We also show that when k increases properly with n, random k-regular graphs maintain a structural robustness within a constant factor of the complete graph's while also having the minimum average degree required for such robustness.