arXiv++ Combinatorics

Let $D$ be an oriented graph with skew adjacency matrix $S(D)$. Two oriented graphs $D$ and $C$ are said to share the same generalized skew spectrum if $S(D)$ and $S(C)$ have the same eigenvalues, and $J-S(D)$ and $J-S(C)$ also have the same eigenvalues, where $J$ is the all-ones matrix. Such graphs that are not isomorphic are generalized cospectral mates. We derive tight upper bounds on the number of non-isomorphic generalized cospectral mates an oriented graph can admit, based on arithmetic criteria involving the determinant of its skew-walk matrix. As a special case, we also provide a criterion for an oriented graph to be weakly determined by its generalized skew spectrum (WDGSS), that is, its only generalized cospectral mate is its transpose. These criteria relate directly to the controllability of graphs, a fundamental concept in the control of networked systems, thereby connecting spectral characterization of graphs to graph controllability.

We study the strong structural controllability (SSC) of diffusively coupled networks, where the external control inputs are injected to only some nodes, namely the leaders. For such systems, one measure of controllability is the dimension of strong structurally controllable subspace, which is equal to the smallest possible rank of controllability matrix under admissible (positive) coupling weights. In this paper, we compare two tight lower bounds on the dimension of strong structurally controllable subspace: one based on the distances of followers to leaders, and the other based on the graph coloring process known as zero forcing. We show that the distance-based lower bound is usually better than the zero-forcing-based bound when the leaders do not constitute a zero-forcing set. On the other hand, we also show that any set of leaders that can be shown to achieve complete SSC via the distance-based bound is necessarily a zero-forcing set. These results indicate that while the zero-forcing based approach may be preferable when the focus is only on verifying complete SSC, the distance-based approach is usually more informative when partial SSC is also of interest. Furthermore, we also present a novel bound based on the combination of these two approaches, which is always at least as good as, and in some cases strictly greater than, the maximum of the two bounds. We support our analysis with numerical results for various graphs and leader sets.