arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study Frankl's union-closed sets conjecture through the height of the inclusion poset. Working in the equivalent empty-set-free formulation, where one seeks an element contained in strictly more than half of the members, we prove the conjecture for every finite union-closed family of height at most four. Equivalently, the usual at-least-half formulation holds for every union-closed family containing the empty set and having height at most five. We also develop a structural theory for the next unresolved case. Assuming a smallest empty-set-free counterexample of height at most five, we show that it has even cardinality $2t$, at least three critical elements of frequency $t$, and satisfies the minimal-counterexample bound $t \geq 2n-1$. Every critical element determines a coatom of the form $U \setminus \{x\}$, while every critical pair satisfies a dichotomy between a full double-avoidance top and a large avoidance fiber admitting a three-layer trace normal form. Coordinate deletion further yields an exact matching-defect obstruction. Finally, introducing the minimum number of join-irreducible members required to cover all critical elements, we exclude the five-cover case and show that this critical join-cover number is either three or four. These results substantially constrain any possible height-five counterexample while leaving the remaining transfer problem explicit.

In recent progress on the union-closed sets conjecture, a key lemma has been Boppana's entropy inequality: $h(x^2)\geφxh(x)$, where $φ=(1+\sqrt5)/2$ and $h(x)=-x\log x-(1-x)\log(1-x)$. In this note, we prove that the generalized inequality $α_kh(x^k)\ge x^{k-1}h(x)$, first conjectured by Yuster, holds for real $k>1$, where $α_k$ is the unique positive solution to $x(1+x)^{k-1}=1$. This implies an analogue of the union-closed sets conjecture for approximate $k$-union closed set systems. We also formalize our proof in Lean 4.

Frankl's conjecture, also known as the union-closed sets conjecture, can be equivalently expressed in terms of intersection-closed set families by considering the complements of sets. It posits that any family of sets closed under intersections, and containing both the ground set and the empty set, must have a ``rare vertex'' -- a vertex belonging to at most half of the members of the family. The concept of \emph{average rarity} describes a set family where the average degree of all the elements is at most half of the number of its members. Average rarity is a stronger property that implies the existence of a rare vertex. This paper focuses on ideal families, which are set families that are downward-closed (except the ground set) and include the ground set. We present a proof that the normalized degree sum of any ideal family is non-positive, which is equivalent to saying that every ideal family satisfies the average rarity condition. This proof is formalized and verified using the Lean 4 theorem prover.

The union-closed sets conjecture, also known as Frankl's conjecture, is a well-studied problem with various formulations. In terms of lattices, the conjecture states that every finite lattice $L$ with more than one element contains a join-irreducible element that is less than or equal to at most half of the elements in $L$. In this work, we obtain several necessary conditions for any counterexample $\tilde{L}$ of minimum size.

We prove that for any isomorphism $h: \mathcal{K}_1 \to \mathcal{K}_2$ between pure union-closed families, there exists a hyperisomorphism $H: \bigcup \mathcal{K}_1 \to \bigcup \mathcal{K}_2$ such that $h(A) = \{ H(a) \mid a \in A \}$, for all $A \in \mathcal{K}_1$. Since every union-closed family forms a lattice under inclusion, this result establishes a strong connection between the two frameworks. More precisely, any such family can be uniquely reconstructed from its lattice up to isomorphism. Hence, the lattice representation provides a faithful encoding, offering a perspective that may yield new insights into problems on union-closed families, including Frankl's union-closed sets conjecture.

The union-closed sets conjecture (sometimes referred to as Frankl's conjecture) states that every finite, nontrivial union-closed family of sets has an element that is in at least half of its members. Although the conjecture is known to be false in the infinite setting, we show that many interesting results can still be recovered by imposing suitable chain conditions and considering carefully chosen elements called optimal elements. We use these elements to show that the union-closed conjecture holds for both finite and infinite union-closed families such that the cardinality of any chain of sets is at most three. We also show that the conjecture holds for all nontrivial topological spaces satisfying the descending chain condition on its open sets. Notably, none of those arguments depend on the cardinality of the underlying family or its universe. Finally, we provide an interesting class of families that satisfy the conclusion of the conjecture but are not necessarily union-closed.

The Union-Closed Sets Conjecture asks whether every union-closed set family $\mathcal{F}$ has an element contained in half of its sets. In 2022, Nagel posed a generalisation of this problem, suggesting that the $k$th-most popular element in a union-closed set family must be contained in at least $\frac{1}{2^{k-1} + 1} |\mathcal{F}|$ sets. We combine the entropic method of Gilmer with the combinatorial arguments of Knill to show that this is indeed the case for all $k \ge 2$, and characterise the families that achieve equality. Furthermore, we show that when $|\mathcal{F}| \to \infty$, the $k$th-most frequent element will appear in at least $\left( \frac{3 - \sqrt{5}}{2} - o(1) \right) |\mathcal{F}|$ sets, reflecting the recent progress made for the Union-Closed Set Conjecture.

The Union-Closed Sets Conjecture, also known as Frankl's conjecture, asks whether, for any union-closed set family $\mathcal{F}$ with $m$ sets, there is an element that lies in at least $\frac{1}{2}\cdot m$ sets in $\mathcal{F}$. In 2022, Nagel posed a stronger conjecture that within any union-closed family whose ground set size is at least $k$, there are always $k$ elements in the ground set that appear in at least $\frac{1}{2^{k-1}+1}$ proportion of the sets in the family. Das and Wu showed that this conjecture is true for $k\geq 3$ and $k=2$ if $|\mathcal{F}|$ is outside a particular range. In this companion paper, we analyse further when $\mathcal{F}$ fails Nagel's conjecture for $k=2$ via linear programming.

The seminal work of Benczúr and Karger demonstrated cut sparsifiers of near-linear size, with several applications throughout theoretical computer science. Subsequent extensions have yielded sparsifiers for hypergraph cuts and more recently linear codes over Abelian groups. A decade ago, Kogan and Krauthgamer asked about the sparsifiability of arbitrary constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs). For this question, a trivial lower bound is the size of a non-redundant CSP instance, which admits, for each constraint, an assignment satisfying only that constraint (so that no constraint can be dropped by the sparsifier). For graph cuts, spanning trees are non-redundant instances. Our main result is that redundant clauses are sufficient for sparsification: for any CSP predicate R, every unweighted instance of CSP(R) has a sparsifier of size at most its non-redundancy (up to polylog factors). For weighted instances, we similarly pin down the sparsifiability to the so-called chain length of the predicate. These results precisely determine the extent to which any CSP can be sparsified. A key technical ingredient in our work is a novel application of the entropy method from Gilmer's recent breakthrough on the union-closed sets conjecture. As an immediate consequence of our main theorem, a number of results in the non-redundancy literature immediately extend to CSP sparsification. We also contribute new techniques for understanding the non-redundancy of CSP predicates. In particular, we give an explicit family of predicates whose non-redundancy roughly corresponds to the structure of matching vector families in coding theory. By adapting methods from the matching vector codes literature, we are able to construct an explicit predicate whose non-redundancy lies between $Ω(n^{1.5})$ and $\widetilde{O}(n^{1.6})$, the first example with a provably non-integral exponent.

The Union-Closed Sets Conjecture, often attributed to Péter Frankl in 1979, remains an open problem in discrete mathematics. It posits that for any finite family of sets $S\neq\{\emptyset\}$, if the union of any two sets in the family is also in the family, then $\underline{\text{there must exist an element that belongs to at least half of the member sets}}$. We will refer to the underlined text as the abundance condition. In 2001, David Reimer proved that the average set size of a union-closed family $S$ must be at least $\frac{1}{2}\log_{2}|S|$. When proving this result, he showed that a family being union-closed implies that the family satisfies certain conditions, which we will refer to as the Reimer's conditions. Therefore, as seen in the context of Tim Gowers' polymath project on the Union-Closed Sets Conjecture, it is natural to ask if all families that satisfy Reimer's conditions meet the abundance condition. A minimal counterexample to this question was offered by Raz in 2017. In this paper, we will discuss a general method to construct infinitely many such counterexamples with any fixed lower bound on the size of the member sets. Furthermore, we will discuss some properties related to these counterexamples, especially those focusing on how far these counterexamples are from being union-closed.

We prove that the conjecture made by Peter Frankl in the late 1970s is true. In other words for every finite union-closed family which contains a non?empty set, there is an element that belongs to at least half of its m

We embark on a systematic study of the $(k+1)$-th derivative of $x^{k-r}H(x^r)$, where $H(x):=-x\log x-(1-x)\log(1-x)$ is the binary entropy and $k>r\geq 1$ are integers. Our motivation is the conjectural entropy inequality $α_k H(x^k)\geq x^{k-1}H(x)$, where $0<α_k<1$ is given by a functional equation. The $k=2$ case was the key technical tool driving recent breakthroughs on the union-closed sets conjecture. We express $ \frac{d^{k+1}}{dx^{k+1}}x^{k-r}H(x^r)$ as a rational function, an infinite series, and a sum over generalized Stirling numbers. This allows us to reduce the proof of the entropy inequality for real $k$ to showing that an associated polynomial has only two real roots in the interval $(0,1)$, which also allows us to prove the inequality for fractional exponents such as $k=3/2$. The proof suggests a new framework for proving tight inequalities for the sum of polynomials times the logarithms of polynomials, which converts the inequality into a statement about the real roots of a simpler associated polynomial.

A family of sets $\mathcal{A}$ is union-closed if it is finite and nonempty with member sets that are all finite and distinct (at least one of which is nonempty) and it satisfies the property $X, Y \in \mathcal{A} \implies X \cup Y \in \mathcal{A}$. Let $\binom{S}{k}$ be the set of all $k$-element subsets of a set $S$, and let $[n]=\{1,2,\cdots,n\}$ represent $\bigcup_{A \in \mathcal{A}}A$. Further, let $\mathcal{A}_B=\{A\in\mathcal{A} \ | \ A \cap B = B\}$ and $\mathcal{A}_{\underline{B}}=\{A\in\mathcal{A} \ | \ A \cap B = \emptyset\}$. We consider, for any union-closed family $\mathcal{A}$, the class of conjectures $\textrm{UC}_x \colon \ \exists B \in \binom{[n]}{n-x+1} \ | \ |\mathcal{A}_B| \geq |\mathcal{A}_{\underline{B}}|$, where $x \in [n]$. The extremal case $x=n$ is equivalent to the union-closed sets conjecture, also known as Frankl's conjecture, which states that there exists an element of $[n]$ that is in at least $\frac{|\mathcal{A}|}{2}$ member sets of $\mathcal{A}$. We prove $\textrm{UC}_x$ for $x \in [\lceil \frac{n}{3} \rceil + 1]$, and also investigate two strengthenings of the union-closed sets conjecture.

Let $M$ be a non-zero binary matrix with distinct rows where the rows are closed under certain logical operators. In this article, we investigate the existence of columns containing an equal or greater number of ones than zeros. Specifically, the existence of such columns when the rows of the matrix are closed under $\textit{material conditional}$ leads us to a weaker version of the $\textit{Union-Closed Set Conjecture}$.

Recently, Gilmer proved the first constant lower bound for the union-closed sets conjecture via an information-theoretic argument. The heart of the argument is an entropic inequality involving the OR function of two i.i.d.\ binary vectors, and the best constant obtainable through the i.i.d.\ coupling is $\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2}\approx0.38197$. Sawin demonstrated that the bound can be strictly improved by considering a convex combination of the i.i.d.\ coupling and the max-entropy coupling, and the best constant obtainable through this approach is around 0.38234, as evaluated by Yu and Cambie. In this work we show analytically that the bound can be further strictly improved by considering another class of coupling under which the two binary sequences are i.i.d.\ conditioned on an auxiliary random variable. We also provide a new class of bounds in terms of finite-dimensional optimization. For a basic instance from this class, analysis assisted with numerically solved 9-dimensional optimization suggests that the optimizer assumes a certain structure. Under numerically verified hypotheses, the lower bound for the union-closed sets conjecture can be improved to approximately 0.38271, a number that can be defined as the solution to an analytic equation.

The union-closed sets conjecture, attributed to Péter Frankl from 1979, states that for any non-empty finite union-closed family of finite sets not consisting of only the empty set, there is an element that is in at least half of the sets in the family. We prove a version of Frankl's conjecture for families distributed according to any one of infinitely many distributions. As a corollary, in the intersection-closed reformulation of Frankl's conjecture, we obtain that it is true for families distributed according to any one of infinitely many Maxwell--Boltzmann distributions with inverse temperatures bounded below by a positive universal constant. Frankl's original conjecture corresponds to zero inverse temperature.

In a recent breakthrough, Gilmer proved the union closed conjecture up to a constant factor. Using Gilmer's method and additional ideas, Chase and Lovett proved an optimal result for almost union-closed set systems. Here that result is extended to higher order unions.

We provide a proof of the union-closed sets conjecture, by means of a suitable refinement of the breakthrough entropy-approach introduced by Gilmer. The novelty here is to consider a convex combination of $A$ and $A\cup B$, where $A,B$ are independent samples from the uniform distribution over a union-closed family.

We provide a simple proof of a curious inequality for the binary entropy function, an inequality that has been used in two different contexts. In the 1980's, Boppana used this entropy inequality to prove lower bounds on Boolean formulas. More recently, the inequality was used to achieve major progress on Frankl's union-closed sets conjecture. Our proof of the entropy inequality uses basic differential calculus.

The Frankl or Union-Closed Sets conjecture states that for any finite union-closed family of sets $\mathcal{F}$ containing some nonempty set, there is some element $i$ in the ground set $U(\mathcal F) := \bigcup_{S \in \mathcal{F}} S$ of $\mathcal{F}$ such that $i$ is in at least half of the sets in $\mathcal{F}$. In this work, we find new values and bounds for the least integer $FC(k, n)$ such that any union-closed family containing $FC(k, n)$ distinct $k$-sets of an $n$-set $X$ satisfies Frankl's conjecture with an element of $X$. Additionally, we answer an older question of Vaughan regarding symmetry in union-closed families and we give a proof of a recent question posed by Ellis, Ivan and Leader. Finally, we introduce novel local configuration criteria through a generalization of Poonen's Theorem to prove the conjecture for many, previously unknown classes of families.